SailNet Community - View Single Post - Bob Perry's take on Wolfenzee's dream boat
View Single Post
Old 05-23-2013
Jeff_H's Avatar
Jeff_H Jeff_H is offline
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Annapolis, Md
Posts: 6,785
Thanks: 5
Thanked 123 Times in 97 Posts
Rep Power: 10
Jeff_H has a spectacular aura about Jeff_H has a spectacular aura about Jeff_H has a spectacular aura about
Re: Bob Perry's take on Wolfenzee's dream boat

Originally Posted by wolfenzee View Post
To have enough of a roach to make any difference would require running the backstay out on a boomkin. For blue water sailing a batten-less sail will last longer.

I don't know who told you that but its wrong on both counts. Battenless mainsails generally need way more leech tension to work and that greatly shortens the life of the sail. You see them leech flapping their way around the world slatting the sail cloth fibers to death.

In term of lost sail area, a hollow leech on a boat like yours will typically have foot of hollow. Working off Atkin's drawings, with an 18 foot boom, you should be able have roughly 1 foot to as much as 16" of roach. That is somewhere between 45 and 55 square feet of sail area that you are giving away. That is really huge.

When you consider all the facts, like fact you like that your boat is well balanced, that you already have a two foot shorter boom than Atkins drew, and Atkins shows roach on his mainsail, and that hollow leech cut mainsails count on a lot of hook in the leech to minimize flapping, a hollow leech cut sail sounds like a really bad idea.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Curmudgeon at Large- and rhinestone in the rough, sailing my Farr 11.6 on the Chesapeake Bay

Last edited by Jeff_H; 05-23-2013 at 04:56 PM.
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook