Originally Posted by captmetatron
Yes, clearly the size of the chain is the most noteworthy part of this story. Just to add a nice little challenge to those so nitpicky, perhaps the chain size isn't accurate, so I'll restate, and say the technical size of the chain is "big-a**" with a length of "ridiculously long ", because the only point that the chain is even vaguely relevant
Actually, it may be the ONLY relevant part of this indent-impaired tale.
See, the fact that you know so little about your ground tackle tells us that you had no business being afloat as long as you have, or you lied about the size of your chain, trying to make it sound more impressive...
so, that describes the story in a nutshell- either factual misrepresentation, ignorance, exaggeration or just plain a mess of lies.
Pick one. or two.