SailNet Community - View Single Post - Interlux Schooner vs. Sikkens Cetol
View Single Post
  #20  
Old 10-06-2013
bljones's Avatar
bljones bljones is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: South Coast Ontario
Posts: 8,178
Thanks: 32
Thanked 72 Times in 65 Posts
Rep Power: 8
bljones has a spectacular aura about bljones has a spectacular aura about
Re: Interlux Schooner vs. Sikkens Cetol

Quote:
Originally Posted by KeelHaulin View Post
similarly cetol does not require as much maintenance if it is not getting direct sun. My dropboards and trim around the companionway need less maintenance also, and they are not beneath a dodger. Just being on a vertical surface and oriented north-south gives enough sun evasion.
You're abosoutely correct- the trim pictured is under dodger....except for the six months of the year when the dodger is stowed away and it is exposed to snow and rain and sun and sub-zero temperatures.
and the wood that isn't covered isn't in need of maintenance any earlier than that which is dodger protected.


I agree, one can end up chasing brightwork maintenance, and varnishing a peeling ugly finish every year... and it is inevitably because the sanded surface wasn't wiped down before initial coating, there wasn't a full buildup of coats the first time the bare wood was coated, or the first coats were imporoperly thinned, hindering full saturation.

More work up front means less work later.
__________________
It's 5 o'clock somewhere:


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook