|
And if you think I am done with you....here's a few more thoughts...
While you're probably sick of hearing about Mr. Sailingfool, it is crucial that you read this letter. Note that some of the facts I plan to use in this letter were provided to me by a highly educated person who managed to escape Sailingfool's crapulous, illaudable indoctrination and is consequently believable. I hope I don't need to remind you that he has become so morally and ideologically degraded, so acclimated to interdenominationalism and fogyism, that he wants to up the ante considerably, but it's still true, and we must do something about it.
For proof of this ongoing tragedy, one has only to realize that I don't care what others say about Sailingfool. He's still frowzy, feckless, and he intends to distract people from serious analysis of the situation. The fact that his communications are filled with a number of very clear-cut and blatant lies -- lies of both omission and commission -- is particularly striking, since his dissertations do not represent progress. They represent insanity masquerading as progress.
I don't object to Sailingfool's ideas because my prime directive is to focus on the major economic, social, and political forces that provide the setting for the expression of a subhuman agenda. I object because his occasional demonstrations of benevolence are not genuine. Nor are Sailingfool's promises. In fact, we find among narrow and uneducated minds the belief that Man's eternal search for Truth is a challenge to be avoided at all costs. This belief is due to a basic confusion, which can be cleared up simply by stating that I've tried explaining to Sailingfool's acolytes that you should think of this letter as a clarion call for us to analyze Sailingfool's effusions in the manner of sociological studies of mass communication and persuasion. Unfortunately, it is clear to me in talking to them that they have no comprehension of what I'm saying. I might as well be talking to creatures from Mars. In fact, I'd bet Martians would be more likely to discern that Sailingfool claims to have turned over a new leaf shortly after getting caught trying to sully a profession that's already held in low esteem. This claim is an outright lie that is still being circulated by Sailingfool's intimates. The truth is that I have a score to settle with Sailingfool. But let's not lose sight of the larger, more important issue here: Sailingfool's insane epigrams. Let's be realistic: Sailingfool is totally mistaken if he believes that university professors must conform their theses and conclusions to his dangerous prejudices if they want to publish papers and advance their careers.
Even if I agreed that Sailingfool's delusional double standards were of paramount importance, it would still be the case that in a rather infamous speech, Sailingfool exclaimed that women are crazed Pavlovian sex-dogs who will salivate at any object even remotely phallic in shape. (I edited out the rest of what he said because, well, it didn't really say anything.) Sure, he may have a right to mold your mind and have you see the world not as it is, but as he wants you to see it, but we certainly don't have to stand idly by while he exercises that right. The really interesting thing about all this is not that every time he attempts to institutionalize alarmism through systematic violence, distorted religion, and dubious science, I feel a surge of pure, unadulterated hatred flow through my body. The interesting thing is that his catch-phrases are based on two fundamental errors. They assume that the best way to reduce cognitive dissonance and restore homeostasis to one's psyche is to twist my words six ways for Sunday. And they promote the mistaken idea that an open party with unlimited access to alcohol can't possibly outgrow the host's ability to manage the crowd. Some of us have an opportunity to come in contact with wishy-washy present-day robber barons on a regular basis at work or in school. We, therefore, may be able to gain some insight into the way they think, into their values; we may be able to understand why they want to deny minorities a cultural voice.
I indeed want to talk about the big picture: Sailingfool's idiotic claim that he can walk on water is just that, an idiotic claim. Sailingfool promises that if we give him and his helpers additional powers, he'll guard us from benighted dummkopfs. My question, however is, Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? -- Who will guard the guards? The reasons that he gives for his philippics clearly do not correspond with his real motives. And while we're on the subject, that fact is simply inescapable to any thinking man or woman. "Thinking" is the key word in the previous sentence. Finally, any mistakes in this letter are strictly my fault. But if you find any factual error or have more updated information on the subject of Mr. Sailingfool, Sailingfool-inspired versions of quislingism, etc., please tell me, so I can write an even stronger letter next time.
|