Liberal progressive credentials surely vouch-safed, an intrepid columnist raises the speculation that Bill Clinton's enemies were right all along. Of course they weren't right about most things, but maybe???
This dim-bulb doesn't even read his own party's manifesto's. "Sexual predators always repeat their crimes" being the most notable one he's skipped over. Long before Clinton was ever elected President there was evidence of his nature, and his wife's. In a story on "Trooper-gate" the American Spectator revealed that Gennifer Flowers was hardly the first in a line of Clintonian excesses. The basis of the story? Clinton's state trooper security detail.
Our Rip van Winkle of correspondents has awoken and found the Clinton's naked lust for power to be, well, shocking. Perhaps his obtuseness is why circulation is down at the New Republic. Well, aside from those made-up dispatches from an American soldier detailing the war crimes of himself and other members of the Army. The attacks on Obama come as a surprise to our Pulitzer in waiting writer. Yet he confidently contends that there was a vast right wing conspiracy against the Clinton's. The only "conspiracy" against the Clinton's is the one they see when anyone stands in their way of achieving wealth and power.
For a good laugh:
http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/...7890763.column
Note: this posting is a result of recent messages that fail to find me less than fair and balanced. From time to time I will post items from the Looney Left, which I'm not supposed to call them, in the interest of objectivity. The fact that the items are looney, written by loonies, for the consumption of looney's is beyond my control. I can't be responsible for everything. And these guys are funnier than I am. Not quite NYT funny, but close.