|
I would be against that (bombing Osama where ever he is) if it started a war with a nuclear armed country. Liberals wring hands a lot about wars but don't mind starting them- while Clinton wasn't a classic 'liberal' he had no problem sending missles into a drug manufacturing company in Yemen because we 'knew' it was producing WMD's. He also got us involved in Somalia then turned tail and ran because he put us there without the gonads to do it right.
As to whether or not they would start a war, and use nukes - you bet your children's lives on that? Fine - don't bet mine on it. Osama's not worth it. Killing or capturing him is not the end all be all. He's a small part of the terrorist problem not the only part.
I seriously doubt the Pak's are knowingly harboring him.
Ragnar, I choose not to continue that conversation. Argue with someone else.
|