[PBzeer]

Unfortunately for your example, it wasn't words that brought down the Iron Curtain, it was deeds. Deeds do not, nor need not, mean military action. In fact, those which are most effective, do not require the use of guns or bombs. They only require the sure and certain knowledge that they are available, IF NEEDED, and that we will not hesitate to use them, IF NEEDED.
Without that, then diplomacy only is, and only can be, appeasement. For if there is no line we will not allow to be crossed, there is no reason for anyone to stop short of it.

Diplomacy, is a fine and wonderous way to resolve differences between two parties willing to reach agreement. BUT, it does require two parties WILLING to reach agreement. It REQUIRES finding common ground, and it REQUIRES sincerity from both parties to seek and find common ground.

Show me where those conditions exist in Iran, or Russia. Tell me how common ground is found when one side ignores, flaunts, or totally disrespects the obligations they have agreed to, to pursue their own desired ends.

Tell me how diplomacy will stop Iran from developing nuclear weapons, when they have PROMISED, in defiance of UN resolution after resolution not to, that they will. And, are actively engaged in doing so.

Tell me how diplomacy will free Georgia from Russian occupation, when they have already agreed to leave, yet stay.

Tell me how diplomacy will stop the persistent attacks on Israel, when their every concession is met with violence and further demands.

The unending attempt to equate standing firm, with a desire for war, is as obnoxious and disengenious now as it was 50 years ago. And no more valid now, then it was then.

But now though, let us move on to security. Just how is it we are less secure now, then we were before 9/11? What has changed in the world to make us more threatened? And, just who is it we are less secure from?

And who are these "allies" we have lost, that make us less secure? And who were they protecting us from?