[Stede]

Jack,

I agree with the point you''re making about how an older boat should be judged on her updated systems today, and not her reputation at her released date. I have no problem with buying an older boat. They''ve proven over time to have held up very well. I thought I would provide a little more info. On the "how and why" of my recommendation of the H37C. First off, flicker''s requirements are the same as mine,i.e.-live aboard, coastal-blue water capable in the 37ft.range.My price range is a little higher than his-$55k, but I still refer to my list of potential boats as "the poor man''s wish list in blue-water boats." For someone with a tight budget, IMO, the PHRF rating of the boat has to be scrutinized. Don''t get me wrong, all the other design coefficients of the boat are very important, but to me, the PHRF rating translates to $$$. With a heavy boat, you''ve minimized your ability to sail in light air, thus requiring more motoring, which translates to more engine maintenance,and fuel costs. I set my criteria to a PHRF of 150.I really desire a lower rating, but with the money we''re talking, it''s even tougher to find. The H37C has a PHRF of 155.I let her remain on my list because I really like the separate shower from head area,and the many positive remarks I''ve read,and heard about the boat. To purchase a blue water capable boat for under $40k in the 37ft.range is a tough nut to crack indeed. I can think of a few other boats that I would recommend, but none have the room below of the H37C, or her sailing capabilities. I also agree with you on the fit and finish of the E37 being better than the H37C down below, but this is a minor issue to me.IMO,these are cosmetic issues that can easily be fixed with minimal skills, but I can''t change the weight of a boats hull, or her sailing qualities.Anyway, that''s my $.02 worth. Cheers!