|
Let's examine the deficit why don't we:
09/30/2008 10,024,724,896,912.49
09/30/2007 9,007,653,372,262.48
09/30/2006 8,506,973,899,215.23
09/30/2005 7,932,709,661,723.50
09/30/2004 7,379,052,696,330.32
09/30/2003 6,783,231,062,743.62
09/30/2002 6,228,235,965,597.16
09/30/2001 5,807,463,412,200.06
09/30/2000 5,674,178,209,886.86
Seems a small increase each year from 2000 to 2006, then suddenly, once the pay-go dem's take charge of the both houses and the budget - a little bit of a leap, like ONE TRILLION at year.
Yeah Rick, keep doing math. You are as Constitutionally, um, stupid as you logically challenged and non-accountability oriented.
That 53 trillion in shortfalls you spoke of(in the next dozen or so years I assume) can't be made up in taxes, even using your math - it has to be made up in cuts - and you and yours can't make the cuts, instead they add new entitlements. That, my friend from the sunshine state, should put a little light where the sun don't shine for you, but we intrepid readers of your insipidly vacuous post know it won't mean diddly to you because I used words othe than 'change' and spoke of real life, not your messiah's dream reality he found while sitting with the taliban in pakistan in 1983.
Sorry moderators, ban me, there was just no other way to say it clearly.
|