View Single Post
  #1520 (permalink)  
Old 11-14-2008
sailaway21 sailaway21 is offline
Owner, Green Bay Packers
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: SW Michigan
Posts: 10,322
Rep Power: 9
sailaway21 is just really nice sailaway21 is just really nice sailaway21 is just really nice sailaway21 is just really nice
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yamsailor View Post
Gentlemen,

The CO2 analysis's performed over the past 6 years have been able to discern the types of CO2. In other words, CO2 from fossil fuel combustion has a different signature when put under a particular microscope (located in Colorado) as compared to naturally occurring CO2. In other words, as of 6 years ago, the scientific community can now quantify is concentration and mass, the mass of CO2 deposited as result of anthropogenic activity.
I'm still waiting on this guy's details on that super-de-duper Colorado microscope. You don't think he'd just drop the old anthropogenic word on us and then leave, figuring we'd never know it's meaning? Or perhaps he thought he'd made a conclusive and irrefutable argument, one that brooks no dissent?

Maybe it was my signature that put him off. (g)
__________________
“Scientists are people who build the Brooklyn Bridge and then buy it.”
Wm. F. Buckley, Jr.
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook