Quote:
Originally Posted by erps
This may also explain some of the frustration the two sides have talking to each other. The right trys to argue using a set of rules to debate by, while the left aren't bound by such rules and kind of bounce all over the place without the constraints of rules and/or evidence.
|
This explains a lot for me. Our liberal friends are content to spout off about "change" without any clue (or need for a clue) whether this change will be good, bad or indifferent. It also explains why when pressed for facts or evidence, liberals are content to offer neither. If MSNBC said it's so, then it must be so. The fannie and freddie meltdown is a good case in point. Numerous conservatives here presented overwhelming evidence that the majority of the blame for the mortgage meltdown (and the collapse of wall street) can be laid at the feet of Democrats. But none of this evidence matters, because such things would get in the way of "Change".