|
Another little thought exercise, boys and girls.
No one disputes that overall, seatbelt usage saves lives and reduces injuries. So a government mandate for seatbelts and their use would seem to be acceptable government intervention into private behavior. Where instead of making you aware of the advantages, they force them on you.
Now, you might say, this is a good thing. But, if seatbelts and their use had a direct effect on your (forced to buy) insurance premiums, people would demand them in their vehicles and use them, MINUS any government interference.
So let's take a further step into this benign benevolent legislation. Que bono? Who is it that really benefits from the legislation? The insurance companies. Follow the money.
__________________
John
Ontario 32 - Aria
Free, is the heart, that lives not, in fear.
Full, is the spirit, that thinks not, of falling.
True, is the soul, that hesitates not, to give.
Alive, is the one, that believes, in love. JCP
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
- Website & Blog
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|