View Single Post
  #1967 (permalink)  
Old 06-28-2009
ssneade's Avatar
ssneade ssneade is offline
Somewhat Flexible Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: marble hill, ga
Posts: 3,045
Rep Power: 4
ssneade will become famous soon enough
This “green” crap is really getting on my nerves. I have read more info on this nonsense than many people. Everything I read from the warmers basically comes down to their belief CO2 is the driver of this warming. It’s all about the CO2. Let’s not even get to the folly of someone declaring a vital element that provides life to plants and animals as a pollutant. Nor let’s not even bring up the fact that the “hockey stick” (which I would love to use over Gore’s head) has been discredited and that CO2 actually increases many years AFTER temperatures have already increased (so much for CO2 driving temps.) It all comes down to this. NOTHING ELSE YOU NEED TO KNOW - A SIMPLE MATH QUIZ for you: Of the greenhouse gas emissions (GGE): - 95% of the GGE comes water vapor of which nearly ALL is NATURAL, i.e. we have no impact on. - 1.5% comes from methane and other gases - the remaining 3.5% comes from that evil CO2. That alone gives you perspective on CO2 impact. But, let’s look a little deeper, of this CO2, 97% of the CO2 is NATURAL!!! I repeat, 97% of the CO2 is natural and we have no control over. That leaves a whopping 3% of CO2 that man has an impact on. In other words, manmade CO2 represents 3% of 3.5%, or for the govt educated out there – a whopping 0.105% of greenhouse gas emissions. QUIZ: How does 0.105% of anything have an impact, you mindless warming twits? Hell, if everyone’s goal was to increase their carbon footprint tenfold, it would still be a trace component. To top it off, this all assumes that CO2 is even a pollutant!
By Club-a-Liberal
that's real!
__________________
Self Proclaimed Genius
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook