View Single Post
  #7366 (permalink)  
Old 07-25-2009
sailaway21 sailaway21 is offline
Owner, Green Bay Packers
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: SW Michigan
Posts: 10,322
Rep Power: 9
sailaway21 is just really nice sailaway21 is just really nice sailaway21 is just really nice sailaway21 is just really nice
Heading down the road of determining whom is eligible for health care insurance is a path I'd recommend not treading. Are we really proposing that some body be placed in charge of what is a healthy lifestyle? Government or the insurance industry are going to reach similar conclusions; whatever costs them money is an unhealthy lifestyle. As if the health insurance bureaucracy is not bloated enough, all we need is our citizens in a protracted dispute over what is unhealthy for them.

Of course, the logical extension of such a policy will be such things as determining a "life worth living" and similar unquantifiable's. Why spend all that money for one more year on a seventy eight year old life? Why expend funds on a child doomed to a short existence because of congenital defects? Abortion is cheaper than a full term pregnancy.

Absent any effective competition for my health care insurance dollars, I see little reason to start surrendering my existing coverage wholesale. I think it's supposed to be the insurance and the health care industry that is supposed to be competitive and not the patients.
__________________
“Scientists are people who build the Brooklyn Bridge and then buy it.”
Wm. F. Buckley, Jr.
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook