View Single Post
  #729 (permalink)  
Old 12-15-2009
Yamsailor's Avatar
Yamsailor Yamsailor is offline
Yamsailor
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 699
Rep Power: 6
Yamsailor is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by PBzeer View Post
In general, that's why I feel we need to move to an individual based policy system rather than an employer based one. Then a change in job status, doesn't affect your insurance coverage.

Your problem though, is the here and now of course. (Which isn't addressed in a timely manner for you in any of the current legislation, and you'll be eligible for Medicare by the time it is)

I think, allowing retirees over 60 to buy into Medicare until eligible is not a bad idea, though I don't know how workable it is. Also, if there was a nationwide pool of pre-existing condition (which I assume your meds are for) people (selling across state lines), I would expect some company would fill that need. Though certainly at a higher premium.

Alternately of course, you could've kept working till 65.
I do not see how this solves the problem of an insurance company dropping someone by being proactive and controlling his condition. Portability means nothing of the company drops for the reasons stated above or did I miss something?
__________________
There isn't a device on this world that can measure the indifference I have for that statement.

Last edited by Yamsailor; 12-16-2009 at 09:39 AM.
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook