SailNet Community - View Single Post - PSC 34 vs Pearson 34 - a good problem to have
View Single Post
post #2 of Old 02-15-2010
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Lake Ontario
Posts: 277
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 10
I have a PSC 34 on Lake Ontario, but I do not have sailing time on a Pearson 34. My comparison for performance considerations is based on my experience racing a Kirby 25 which is of course quite a different beast. While the PSC 34 performs reasonably well by blue water cruiser standards (modified fin keel, narrow beam, moderate side of heavy displacement), it's unlikely to keep up with a flat-bottomed, lighter, longer waterline, and greater sail area design. The boat points reasonably well (narrow beam = narrow sheeting angles, etc.). It needs a spinnker for light air.

As I'm no longer racing, I've traded off a little of the performance for the easy going ride and other security the PSC provides. I get a lot of compliments on the boat as the canoe stern is rare here, and it has a really nice sheerline and asthetic due to the bow overhang and exterior teak trim.

The cockpit and cabin sizes are realtively small by comparison to other modern 34 footers,and there's not a lot of storage space, so these are important considerations for some uses.

Although I'm very happy with the boat as far as it meets my requirements, with regard to performance I'd characterize it as a good performer but not a great one. The mast is not as high as it might be, the sail areas are kept fairly low, and other design choices were made (e.g., small cockpit) so the boat stands up well in worst-case blue water conditions. Some of these design choices reduce performance compared to modern coastal cruisers / racers. In open water, I'd choose the PSC overall based on my needs. For performance coastal crusing / racing, I wouldn't.
MC1 is offline  
Quote Share with Facebook
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome