SailNet Community - View Single Post - santana 30 or j30?
View Single Post
  #25  
Old 01-01-2012
Jeff_H's Avatar
Jeff_H Jeff_H is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Annapolis, Md
Posts: 6,559
Thanks: 5
Thanked 92 Times in 69 Posts
Rep Power: 10
Jeff_H has a spectacular aura about Jeff_H has a spectacular aura about Jeff_H has a spectacular aura about
Quote:
Originally Posted by SloopJonB View Post
Jeff, I beg to differ on this point. The IOR boats from IIIA on (at least) had wet noodle rigs that required expertise just to keep them up - have you forgotten the "oil derrick" 3 and 4 spreader rigs from the late 70's on?
Jon B;

You are correct, I should have qualified my earlier statement and said, "early IOR boats had masthead rigs that depended on very stiff spars and very high rigging loads." As you rightly note, the IOR eventually went to highly flexible spars which depended on very complex rigging geometries to keep them up. Thank you for the reminder.

In a separate matter, the question came up as to where I came up with the statement that a J-30 rates 30 seconds a mile faster than a Santana 30. Below is a link to PHRF Long Island Sound, PHRF New England and PHRF California. In New England the J-30 rates 144 and a Santana 30 rates 174. On Long Island Sound the J-30 rates 141 and the Santana 30 rates 180. In southern California the J-30 rates 138 and the Santana 30 (referred to as San 30-1) rates 180.

PHRF New England: http://www.phrfne.org/page/567[/URL]
PHRF Long Island Sound: http://www.pipeline.com/~wayneb/phrflis.htm#j
PHRF Southern California: http://www.phrfsocal.org/lookup/lookup.php?key=2

Jeff
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Curmudgeon at Large- and rhinestone in the rough, sailing my Farr 11.6 on the Chesapeake Bay and part-time purveyor of marine supplies

Last edited by Jeff_H; 01-01-2012 at 05:15 PM.