SailNet Community - View Single Post - Wood vs Fiberglass Maintenance cost/time
View Single Post
Old 06-27-2012
Classic30's Avatar
Classic30 Classic30 is offline
Once known as Hartley18
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 4,727
Thanks: 44
Thanked 62 Times in 62 Posts
Rep Power: 9
Classic30 will become famous soon enough Classic30 will become famous soon enough
Re: Wood vs Fiberglass Maintenance cost/time

Originally Posted by SloopJonB View Post
Cold moulded is my personal favourite - best of glass and wood. It's not really a wood boat in the sense we are discussing here - it's properly termed a composite boat because the wood is merely the fiber - it's the combination of fiber and resin that makes the material.
If it's your personal favorite, you've obviously never owned one. Best of glass and wood?? Surely you mean the opposite. It might look flash but if you ever get any hull damage, personally, I don't think anyone has yet invented a more complicated and expensive system to fix!

Cold-moulded makes traditional timber repair look like child's play.

Wood vs Fibreglass?? In my experience, when people talk about "low maintenance" and "boat" is the same sentence, they usually mean "absolutely NO maintenance unless absolutely necessary - we just want to sail the thing". A traditional timber boat needs some level of regular maintenance perfectly within the capability of a live-aboard whereas a f'glass boat needs none at all - until almost-too-late.

Both $$$ and time average out in the long term leaving only personal preference as the real decider.. but most go the "no maintenance" route - buy f'glass, sail it for a while and then sell it as a "project boat" just before it becomes too expensive to fix.
"Honestly, I don't know why seamen persist in getting wrecked in some of the outlandish places they do, when they can do it in a nice place like Fiji." -- John Caldwell, "Desperate Voyage"

Last edited by Classic30; 06-27-2012 at 07:38 PM.
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook