SailNet Community - View Single Post - Still confused about water ballast
View Single Post
post #5 of Old 10-16-2012
Old enough to know better
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Beacon, NY
Posts: 3,253
Thanks: 21
Thanked 132 Times in 128 Posts
Rep Power: 9
Re: Still confused about water ballast

Originally Posted by Faster View Post
Here's Hunters explanation for the 260..

Mistress of Grand Traverse

But realistically I think the major benefit is the ability to shed the ballast weight for trailing. Water ballasted Ocean racers carry the water ballast outboard under the gunwales, on very beamy boats. This can equate to several bodies 'on the rail', as is typical of crewed yachts.
I agree and I don't think it is nearly as effective as a denser material. It is used purely to be able to lower the tow-able weight of the boat. They use some really dense and heavy materials like depleted uranium in the bulbs of racing boats correct? So water is not going to have nearly the affect of a more dense material. Even concrete would be more effective but of course it does not flow out well after it sets!

One thing on water ballasts on racing boats is that they can move it from one side to another so as to effect trim. I once saw a guy at a launching ramp explaining to the guy next to him how superior the water ballasts he said just like the racing boats use.
miatapaul is offline  
Quote Share with Facebook
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome