SailNet Community - View Single Post - Still confused about water ballast
View Single Post
  #5  
Old 10-16-2012
miatapaul miatapaul is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Beacon, NY
Posts: 1,918
Thanks: 14
Thanked 62 Times in 60 Posts
Rep Power: 8
miatapaul is on a distinguished road
Re: Still confused about water ballast

Quote:
Originally Posted by Faster View Post
Here's Hunters explanation for the 260..

Mistress of Grand Traverse

But realistically I think the major benefit is the ability to shed the ballast weight for trailing. Water ballasted Ocean racers carry the water ballast outboard under the gunwales, on very beamy boats. This can equate to several bodies 'on the rail', as is typical of crewed yachts.
I agree and I don't think it is nearly as effective as a denser material. It is used purely to be able to lower the tow-able weight of the boat. They use some really dense and heavy materials like depleted uranium in the bulbs of racing boats correct? So water is not going to have nearly the affect of a more dense material. Even concrete would be more effective but of course it does not flow out well after it sets!

One thing on water ballasts on racing boats is that they can move it from one side to another so as to effect trim. I once saw a guy at a launching ramp explaining to the guy next to him how superior the water ballasts he said just like the racing boats use.
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook