Originally Posted by smurphny
If one of them went public saying derogatory things about the company, or the captain, wouldn't they be opening themselves up to lawsuits if the inquiry found differently? They also could conceivably affect any prosecution of those at the front office of this company and may have been asked in no uncertain terms to keep their opinions to themselves.
I get your point, but it suggests there is something derogatory to say, which I suspect there is.
However, my point was, if there is something that would explain the lack of guilt, one would have expected to hear it and it seems unlikely to be quashed.