Originally Posted by TakeFive
You are right, it is trashing you. But chef2sail was quoting someone else's prior comment
as an example of inappropriate statements.
If you read over the hundreds of pages on this thead, you'll see that a few people (chef2sail, me, and a few others) have been suggesting to people that the uninformed speculation is hurtful and counterproductive, and urging some patience for the true facts of the USCG investigation to emerge in their future report.
I do believe that new facts could create a fuller context that may provide more understanding of his thinking at the time.
You are correct and I apologize to chef2sail. I did see that he quoted that from another post. So although it should not have been addressed to chef2sail the response remains appropriate to the quote.