Amusing Analogy - SailNet Community
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 3 Old 04-03-2006 Thread Starter
Senior Member
night0wl's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Fort Lauderdale
Posts: 1,468
Thanks: 0
Thanked 21 Times in 21 Posts
Rep Power: 10
Amusing Analogy

So, I overhear a co-worker at a ballgame talking to a fellow co-worker talking about comparing Used Boats to Used Cars. His statements were trying to convince the other guy that you dont always have to pay out the nose for a new boat, when there's quality used boats out there aplenty. Here's what he compared manufacturers

Used Catalina = Used Toyota Camry...boring, but a great value and keeps going forever

Used Hunter - A Used Ford...fix or repair daily and wont hold its value worth a damn.

I'd like to keep up this analogy - so, how about the community put in the Boat Manufacturer and the equivalent Car Manufacturer (in terms of characteristics)

WHat about Beneteau, C&C, Pearson, Erickson, etc!
night0wl is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
Sponsored Links
post #2 of 3 Old 04-03-2006
Jeff_H's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Annapolis, Md
Posts: 7,039
Thanks: 5
Thanked 176 Times in 143 Posts
Rep Power: 10
I am not sure that you can really use that kind of automobile company analogy for boats because there are so many different ways of measuring quality, not to mention public impressions vs reality both in cars and in boats.

For example, your example which seems consistent with public perception but which is at odds with what marine surveyors have generally told me. When you look at the big three, marine surveyors have consistently told me that Hunters do a better job with the 'systems' and with regulation compliance and stand up better than Catalinas. They also have said, that as a broad generality, Beneteau doesn't do as well as Hunter when it comes to 'systems' and regulation compliance, but otherwise they tend to be better built than the other two.


Jeff_H is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #3 of 3 Old 04-03-2006
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 288
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 10
Jeff, I would be interested in....

jeff, I would be interested in your opinion of Ericsons in relation to the subject of this post, especially the Ericson 30+ (different from the Ericson 30). Especially comments about their performance and quality of construction/possible areas of weakness would be very helpful.
FrankLanger is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook

Quick Reply

By choosing to post the reply above you agree to the rules you agreed to when joining Sailnet.
Click Here to view those rules.

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the SailNet Community forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
Please note: After entering 3 characters a list of Usernames already in use will appear and the list will disappear once a valid Username is entered.

User Name:
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:


Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome