Iron v. Lead Keel - SailNet Community

   Search Sailnet:

 forums  store  


Quick Menu
Forums           
Articles          
Galleries        
Boat Reviews  
Classifieds     
Search SailNet 
Boat Search (new)

Shop the
SailNet Store
Anchor Locker
Boatbuilding & Repair
Charts
Clothing
Electrical
Electronics
Engine
Hatches and Portlights
Interior And Galley
Maintenance
Marine Electronics
Navigation
Other Items
Plumbing and Pumps
Rigging
Safety
Sailing Hardware
Trailer & Watersports
Clearance Items

Advertise Here






Go Back   SailNet Community > General Interest Forums > Boat Review and Purchase Forum
 Not a Member? 


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 05-18-2006
CBinRI's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 903
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 10
CBinRI is on a distinguished road
Iron v. Lead Keel

I have a heard people express a strong preference for lead keels over iron keels. What are the differences and is it a big deal if you encapsulate it? I'm talking about a big fin keel on a 40 + foot boat.
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
  #2  
Old 05-18-2006
pigslo's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 804
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 10
pigslo is on a distinguished road
Lead is favorable because it weighs more in the same volume (alot more) than iron. The result is getting the weight lower in the keel for a better righting moment.
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
  #3  
Old 05-18-2006
Jeff_H's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Annapolis, Md
Posts: 6,445
Thanks: 3
Thanked 64 Times in 47 Posts
Rep Power: 10
Jeff_H has a spectacular aura about Jeff_H has a spectacular aura about Jeff_H has a spectacular aura about
It is a big deal. All other things being relatively equal, there is a major impact on stability vs drag. Iron is roughly 2/3 the density of lead (490 vs 708 lbs per cu ft) If you have two keels of equal external shape the center of gravity of the iron will be roughly 1/6th of the height ballast casting above the cg of the lead. That is very significant.

So much so, that what normally happens when a boat goes from a lead to iron keel is that the designers will often increase the weight of the iron ballast 20% or so above the weight of the lead, or else increase the length and width of the keel so that the cg of the iron is roughly the same as the lead, or some combination of a larger keel external dimension and increased weight with iron. Either can really damage performance and harm seaworthiness. The increase in ballast weight means additional structural loads and decreased carrying capacity. The extra keel area means greater drag and so brings the risk that comes from the need to carry more sail longer in heavy conditions.

Also it is generally considered very bad practice to encapsulate an iron keel. If moisture enters the encapsulation envelope, as happens more often than not, it is able to cause small amounts of corrosion which progressively destroys the bond between the ballast casting and the encapsulation envelope. Since that bond is an important part of the keel structure in most production boats, this is the beginning of the end for that boat. Iron works better for a bolt on keel where it can be maintained with a sacrificial barrier coat.

Jeff

Last edited by Jeff_H; 05-18-2006 at 04:53 PM.
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
  #4  
Old 05-18-2006
sailingdog's Avatar
Telstar 28
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: New England
Posts: 43,291
Thanks: 0
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
Rep Power: 13
sailingdog is just really nice sailingdog is just really nice sailingdog is just really nice sailingdog is just really nice sailingdog is just really nice
Also, Jeff H probably should have mentioned that iron tends to expand as it rusts, and the pressure caused by the expansion of iron corroding can do an awful lot of damage to the nearby fiberglass.
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
  #5  
Old 05-18-2006
Faster's Avatar
Just another Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: New Westminster, BC
Posts: 14,390
Thanks: 63
Thanked 160 Times in 157 Posts
Rep Power: 10
Faster has a spectacular aura about Faster has a spectacular aura about Faster has a spectacular aura about
While I would agree that lead is much preferred (for a number of reasons, previously stated) I would not consider a bolt-on iron keel a deal-breaker if the boat was otherwise suitable and had been reasonably and properly maintained. We have owned, over the years, 5 sailboats of various sizes (24 - 40') three of which had iron keels. The maintenance routines are more onerous, more frequent haulouts and careful maintenance of antifouling and whatever other rust protection coatings are used is a definite must. Repairing a neglected iron keel is a rather big job, especially if it has been left a long time. But if the boat was designed around the keel material in the first place, it could still be a decent boat.

Last edited by Faster; 05-25-2006 at 03:52 PM.
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
  #6  
Old 05-25-2006
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 3
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 0
pithwit is on a distinguished road
I have an iron ballasted fiberglass encased boat (Alacrity, 1960s), and the years of moisture has caused the iron to expand and explode the fiberglass keels. So, yeah, lead would have been a much better idea (actually, they used both, 50/50). The boat is reparable, but only at considerable time and expense, which it may not get. As I shop for a new boat, lead or iron keel is my first question.
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
  #7  
Old 05-25-2006
Gene T's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Left Coast USA
Posts: 666
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 8
Gene T is on a distinguished road
One compromise that is common now and works pretty well is to bolt on an iron keel and use a lead bulb. The iron needs to be epoxy coated but if done correctly will last as long as you don't sand through it. The iron provides the strength and the lead bulb provides the weight in the best place. I think it is a very workable solution. I had an iron keel on a long (full) keel boat once that had not been epoxy coated and it required extra work each time it was hauled, but not a huge problem. I would not own a boat that did not have a bolted on keel.
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
  #8  
Old 05-25-2006
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Posts: 190
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 14
rbh1515 is on a distinguished road
deal breaker

For me the lead vs iron was a dealbreaker. I was looking at new Catalinas vs new Beneteaus. The Catalinas have lead keels, and the Beneteaus I considered had iron. I went with the Catalina and that was a very important consideration for me. Rob
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
  #9  
Old 05-31-2006
CBinRI's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 903
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 10
CBinRI is on a distinguished road
I appreciate the input. Many thanks to all.
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
  #10  
Old 08-19-2006
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 0
geo14 is on a distinguished road
Member

Quote:
Originally Posted by CBinRI
I have a heard people express a strong preference for lead keels over iron keels. What are the differences and is it a big deal if you encapsulate it? I'm talking about a big fin keel on a 40 + foot boat.
Am looking at a Jeaunneau 42 DS with cast iron keel and bronze bolts that are electrically insulated. Sail Net Artical a good one......I attached just part of Don Casey's fine explanation.
george
Bronze Keel Bolts Bronze cannot be used in a cast-iron keel (unless the bolts are electrically insulated from the iron) but it is a superior choice for attaching a lead keel. Unlike stainless, bronze likes stagnant seawater. A good marine bronze can lose less than one thousandth of an inch to corrosion in 40 years of immersion. Bronze keel bolts generally succumb to overtightening rather than to corrosion. Under normal circumstances they are good for the life of the boat.
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

 
Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may post attachments
You may edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Info on BENETEAU FIRST 405 1987 rockietopman Boat Review and Purchase Forum 8 06-15-2011 12:18 PM
Wing, fin, or bulb...what are the trade offs? langousta Gear & Maintenance 17 09-17-2008 04:54 PM
reducing keel/adding fin? abacosol Gear & Maintenance 9 07-01-2007 09:32 PM
Internal Ballast vs. External Ballast windship General Discussion (sailing related) 3 09-15-2002 04:33 PM
Winged Keels Pros & Cons OldGlory Boat Review and Purchase Forum 13 04-09-2002 05:51 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:00 PM.

Add to My Yahoo!         
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1
(c) Marine.com LLC 2000-2012