C&C 33 mk1 vs 34 vs Landfall 35 - SailNet Community

   Search Sailnet:

 forums  store  


Quick Menu
Forums           
Articles          
Galleries        
Boat Reviews  
Classifieds     
Search SailNet 
Boat Search (new)

Shop the
SailNet Store
Anchor Locker
Boatbuilding & Repair
Charts
Clothing
Electrical
Electronics
Engine
Hatches and Portlights
Interior And Galley
Maintenance
Marine Electronics
Navigation
Other Items
Plumbing and Pumps
Rigging
Safety
Sailing Hardware
Trailer & Watersports
Clearance Items

Advertise Here






Go Back   SailNet Community > On Board > Boat Review and Purchase Forum
 Not a Member? 


Like Tree4Likes
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 10-28-2014
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Wilmington, NC
Posts: 22
Thanks: 6
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 0
Silverton10 is on a distinguished road
C&C 33 mk1 vs 34 vs Landfall 35

I was reading old posts (2008) and saw this comment about C&C 34 vs 35:

12-09-2008

FWIW, the C&C 35 Marks I or II are twice the boat the 34 is... better made, stiffer and faster...



I am fairly new to sailing, and looking to get my first boat. I am in North Carolina. I will be doing mostly day sailing and weekend coastal cruising for the next several years.

In my general vicinity, there are several C&C boats for sale. I'm attracted them based on their performance stats and reports of quality build, as well as aesthetics. The boats are a '75 33 MKI, '79 34, and a '82 Landfall 35.

The 33 seems like it would be a good performer (not looking to club race, but of course would enjoy coaxing out as much speed as possible), and the Landfall seems like the cabin would be a little more accommodating but not as performance oriented. I'm balancing my desire to enjoy the speed and fun of sailing and pushing this level boat, but also would appreciate moderate comforts when I have guests, or decide to slow down and enjoy a trip to the islands, etc.

In light of comment above from an older post, was wondering if others had any other insights or experience/recommendations?

All boats seem fairly well maintained, relatively equally equipped, and similar price range - $17K-$22K.

Thanks in advance for any insights.

Randy
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message Share with Facebook
  #2  
Old 10-28-2014
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 4
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 0
sailors is on a distinguished road
Re: C&C 33 mk1 vs 34 vs Landfall 35

I've owned two C&C's and have sailed on many others. IMHO, all were well built and some sail better than others. You can look at reviews right on this site under Resources, and then C&C of owners telling of the good and the bad of each model. Also check out the THE C&C PHOTO ALBUM & RESOURCE CENTER for more information.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message Share with Facebook
  #3  
Old 10-28-2014
Old enough to know better
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Beacon, NY
Posts: 2,322
Thanks: 18
Thanked 82 Times in 79 Posts
Rep Power: 9
miatapaul is on a distinguished road
Re: C&C 33 mk1 vs 34 vs Landfall 35

The 33 will be the most tender from my research, the the 34 and finally the 35 should be the least tender (tender meaning that it will lean more to a given amount of wind) as it is there cruising hull. The 34 should be the fastest with the 33 and 35 coming in some bit slower, but not a lot. Some of the 35 landfall have a layout with the salon forward in the V and have a huge v shaped settee that makes into a giant bed, and a double quarter birth. Really nice layout for a cruising couple but not necessary a family. I like the layout, but not everyone does.

Keep in mind the 35 has a cored hull, and the 34 might as well. This is not necessarily bad, but will require a careful survey. Also rod rigging is long lasting, but do not show much in the way of deterioration, so may need to be replaced.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message Share with Facebook
  #4  
Old 10-28-2014
Faster's Avatar
Just another Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: New Westminster, BC
Posts: 15,299
Thanks: 88
Thanked 241 Times in 232 Posts
Rep Power: 10
Faster has a spectacular aura about Faster has a spectacular aura about Faster has a spectacular aura about
Re: C&C 33 mk1 vs 34 vs Landfall 35

The C&C 34 is definitely a cored hull, the 33 probably not, the LF35 likely is as MP indicated.

Unless you're planning on doing a fair bit of weekending/overnighting and summer cruising I think the LF 35 would be more than you want/need. Also as MP mentioned, the LF layouts are a 'love'em or hate'em' kind of thing. You'd need to check it out in person.

Of the three mentioned the 34 is probably the nicest mix of performance and accommodation, though they are known to be tender and apparently had trouble sailing to their ratings (my recollection of sailing a 33mk1 was not of a tender boat, but IIRC there wasn't a lot of wind that day) If not racing then rating vs performance is not an issue.

The LF 35 is certainly the 'cruisiest' of the lot.. but might have the better cockpit too.
__________________
Ron

1984 Fast/Nicholson 345 "FastForward"

".. there is much you could do at sea with common sense.. and very little you could do without it.."
Capt G E Ericson (from "The Cruel Sea" by Nicholas Monsarrat)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message Share with Facebook
  #5  
Old 10-29-2014
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Wilmington, NC
Posts: 22
Thanks: 6
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 0
Silverton10 is on a distinguished road
Re: C&C 33 mk1 vs 34 vs Landfall 35

Thanks to all for replies so far.

sailors - yes, I did read all the reviews I could find for each of the boats, as well as watching videos on Youtube, reading specs, etc. My reason for posting this question was to hopefully get input from people who had experience on two or more boats for direct comparisons, rather than just reading reviews of each individually and me extrapolating comparisons.



miatapaul - Appreciate the comparison - as above, that's what I was hoping for. I believe this 35 has the V-berth forward, but after reading the above replies, that one is on the bottom of my list.


Faster - thanks also - the 34 is on the top of my list. My only hesitation now - as I mentioned, I'm in North Carolina, and from what I can tell, shoal drafts are preferred, and the 6' listed draft for the 34 seems like the outside edge of what would be comfortable around here. Any additional thoughts on that?

And now, to throw a wrench in it all, I just saw that there is an Irwin Citation 34 in my town. Of course, I've done all the same reading - reviews, Youtube, specs, etc. Hopefully will get a reply to go see it soon. So, any thoughts on the Irwin 34 versus the C&C 33 and 34? The Irwin seems to have a more comfortable cabin, and while it may not perform quite as well, seems like reviewers are generally pleased overall, stating it performs better downwind, and doesn't point quite as well as others.

Ultimately I'll take the top contenders out and do the in-person check out and even survey, but the C&Cs are 6-10 hours away by car, so trying to be as thorough as possible up front to make informed decisions about what I want to invest in for in-person review.

Thanks again for all the input.

Last edited by Silverton10; 10-29-2014 at 10:23 AM.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message Share with Facebook
  #6  
Old 10-29-2014
kwaltersmi's Avatar
Broad Reachin'
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Grand Rapids, Michigan
Posts: 1,891
Thanks: 1
Thanked 13 Times in 13 Posts
Rep Power: 9
kwaltersmi is on a distinguished road
Re: C&C 33 mk1 vs 34 vs Landfall 35

Quote:
Originally Posted by Faster View Post
The C&C 34 is definitely a cored hull, the 33 probably not, the LF35 likely is as MP indicated.
According to a review on the C&C website, the LF35 hull is indeed cored with 1/2" end grain balsa.

BTW, plenty of good details, pros and cons are given in the thorough review of the LF35.
__________________
Catalina 34

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message Share with Facebook
  #7  
Old 10-29-2014
Faster's Avatar
Just another Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: New Westminster, BC
Posts: 15,299
Thanks: 88
Thanked 241 Times in 232 Posts
Rep Power: 10
Faster has a spectacular aura about Faster has a spectacular aura about Faster has a spectacular aura about
Re: C&C 33 mk1 vs 34 vs Landfall 35

I believe there are quite a few satisfied, happy Irwin owners here on SN.. given the location it's definitely worth a look. A bit more 'sedate' looking than the C&Cs in general.. but I think they're decent boats. No personal experience with them though.
__________________
Ron

1984 Fast/Nicholson 345 "FastForward"

".. there is much you could do at sea with common sense.. and very little you could do without it.."
Capt G E Ericson (from "The Cruel Sea" by Nicholas Monsarrat)

Last edited by Faster; 10-29-2014 at 12:32 PM.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message Share with Facebook
  #8  
Old 10-29-2014
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Wilmington, NC
Posts: 22
Thanks: 6
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 0
Silverton10 is on a distinguished road
Re: C&C 33 mk1 vs 34 vs Landfall 35

kwaltersmi - yep, I read that review - wish I could get that level of detail for every boat that I wanted to explore!

Faster - that seems to be my impression about Irwins - adequate, satisfying, good all around. I agree though, I do like the lines of the C&C compared to the Irwin. I'll get to check out the Irwin tomorrow. Proximity, and listed cost at about $6K less, with new standing/running rigging, etc etc is certainly weighing in favor of the Irwin.

Last edited by Silverton10; 10-29-2014 at 11:08 AM.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message Share with Facebook
  #9  
Old 10-29-2014
Old enough to know better
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Beacon, NY
Posts: 2,322
Thanks: 18
Thanked 82 Times in 79 Posts
Rep Power: 9
miatapaul is on a distinguished road
Re: C&C 33 mk1 vs 34 vs Landfall 35

Yes, Irwins seem to be kind of hit or miss on quality. There seemed to be times that the construction got kind of wonky. But if it is a good one they are by all accounts very solid tanks, but quite a bit slower than a C&C.

Best thing is to try to get out on as many boats as you can. See if you can get out on a cruising tank to see if you would be frustrated by it's performance, and try to crew on some race boats. Some folks are quite happy and prefer a stable slower cruising boat even for day sails.

There are two numbers I think are useful for comparing boats PHRF rating and sail area to displacement ratio. PHRF rating can give a good indication as to the general performance. A boat that has a higher rating will tend to be more cruise oriented, while lower ones will be more performance oriented in general. So if you are looking at a 35 foot boat that rates 95 (making up hypothetical numbers) vs one that rates 195 the one that is 195 will take a hundred more seconds to cover an average course mile. At least in theory it is likely be more stable but not always. But it generally gives a good idea as to performance.

http://www.ussailing.org/wp-content/...%20Average.pdf

C&C 33 150
C&C 34 144
C&C 35 LANDFALL 156

So they are all in the same vicinity.

Irwin 34 range from 162 to 174. So they are a bit behind, but not too bad, though the center board version is getting up there. But on the other hand it is a sailboat, so who cares it is not like you are going to be going over mid 6 knots at best anyway. Get on them and see what you like and don't like about them.

The other number worth noting is the SA/Displacement ratio. It will give an idea of light wind performance. This can be very important if you live someplace that often has light winds such as Long Island Sound and the Chesapeake.
Sail Calculator Pro v3.54 - 2800+ boats

C&C 33 17.95
C&C 34 17.7
C&C 35 LANDFALL 14.88 (Other sources give it a 15.01)
Irwin 34 16.9

So they are all in line with the exception of the landfall, but I am not sure that number is correct. Generally anything over say 16% should give decent light wind performance.

There are lots of other numbers that can be looked at, but mostly for specific purposes such as offshore work. Such as capsize ratio but for weekending and coastal sailing it is not as important as finding a boat you will be happy with it's performance. But if you see an ad for a boat you are not familiar with I would suggest looking at the above numbers, and then look on Sailboatdata.com and take a look at the line drawings. That will give you an idea if it is something you want to look at.

One other thing if you are going to be spending weekends on the boat don't discount the level of comfort below. If you have a significant other that you want to participate this can be critical if you don't want to find yourself alone out there!

Last edited by miatapaul; 10-29-2014 at 01:21 PM.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message Share with Facebook
The Following User Says Thank You to miatapaul For This Useful Post:
Silverton10 (10-29-2014)
  #10  
Old 10-29-2014
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Port Dover, Ontario
Posts: 105
Thanks: 1
Thanked 6 Times in 6 Posts
Rep Power: 2
aelkin is on a distinguished road
Re: C&C 33 mk1 vs 34 vs Landfall 35

Silver;
Good topic.
I own a C&C 35-1, and race in a fleet that includes a 34, a 33-1, a 33-2, and a number of 25-30 foot C&C's.

In the 90's, this particular 33-1 won everything there was to win on Lake Ontario and Lake Erie. It was a real racing program, with top sails and superb crew. Fast, stable and fun to sail.
the 34 seems to struggle in the fleet, but is a family cruising boat, sporting a stack-pak, davits, etc.
my 35-1 is a top contender, and has cruised my family of 6 in weather I shudder to think about.

All this is to say that C&C boats of the size and vintage you're looking at are top-quality performance cruisers. You seem to have a good idea about what you want and what you need. Make a little matrix of the things that are most important to you, and get on the boats. the layout will likely be the deciding factor, both cockpit and cabin, for your intended purposes.

You can't go too far wrong with a C&C, IMHO.

Good luck.

Andy
jameswilson29 likes this.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message Share with Facebook
Reply

Tags
c&c 33 mki , c&c 34 , c&c landfall 35

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

By choosing to post the reply above you agree to the rules you agreed to when joining Sailnet.
Click Here to view those rules.

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the SailNet Community forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
Please note: After entering 3 characters a list of Usernames already in use will appear and the list will disappear once a valid Username is entered.
User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

 
Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may post attachments
You may edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
1979 C & C 30 Mk1 TJT 58 C & C 1 07-01-2014 12:44 PM
C&C Landfall 35? miatapaul C & C 6 12-12-2012 06:53 PM
polars for C&c 29 mk1 hairybear29@att.net Racing 0 12-10-2012 01:19 PM
C&C Landfall 42 kmtmd Boat Review and Purchase Forum 2 12-06-2012 09:37 PM
Any C& C Landfall 38 owners out there? ex10mer C & C 8 11-10-2009 01:33 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:49 PM.

Add to My Yahoo!         
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1
(c) Marine.com LLC 2000-2012

The SailNet.com store is owned and operated by a company independent of the SailNet.com forum. You are now leaving the SailNet forum. Click OK to continue or Cancel to return to the SailNet forum.