Hunter Build Quality? - Page 2 - SailNet Community

   Search Sailnet:

 forums  store  


Quick Menu
Forums           
Articles          
Galleries        
Boat Reviews  
Classifieds     
Blogs               
Search SailNet 
Boat Search (new)

Shop the
SailNet Store
Anchor Locker
Boatbuilding & Repair
Charts
Clothing
Electrical
Electronics
Engine
Hatches and Portlights
Interior And Galley
Maintenance
Marine Electronics
Navigation
Other Items
Plumbing and Pumps
Rigging
Safety
Sailing Hardware
Trailer & Watersports
Clearance Items









Go Back   SailNet Community > General Interest Forums > Boat Review and Purchase Forum
 Not a Member? 



Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 06-14-2007
SEMIJim's Avatar
Last Grumpy Old Sailor
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: S.E. Michigan, USA
Posts: 2,560
Rep Power: 6
SEMIJim will become famous soon enough SEMIJim will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by sailingfool
The review at Boat Review by David Pascoe - Hunter 28 provides some insight.
Ai yi yi! That's incredible!

No offense to the many Hunter owners out there: But I would really have a hard time giving my custom to a boat builder that would allow something like that out the door with their name on it. Things like that tell me either they have no respect for themselves, they have no respect for their customers, or both.
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 06-14-2007
T34C's Avatar
Thanks Courtney.
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: IL
Posts: 3,880
Rep Power: 8
T34C has a spectacular aura about T34C has a spectacular aura about T34C has a spectacular aura about
I'm keepin my mouth shut... No really!
__________________
Maeven
Tartan 34C Yawl #282

Anything-sailing.com
Moderator
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 06-14-2007
SEMIJim's Avatar
Last Grumpy Old Sailor
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: S.E. Michigan, USA
Posts: 2,560
Rep Power: 6
SEMIJim will become famous soon enough SEMIJim will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by brak
By the age of boats you are looking for, initial build quality matters much less (unless manufacturer did something extremely different, either bad or good). So, don't worry about build quality much. Worry about particular condition of a particular boat. They are all different and all have different problems. Anything build in that timeframe will definitely have a whole laundry list.
I'm aware of this. (Thanks for pointing it out, anyway.) But: All else being equal, ISTM the better-engineered, better-built boat would be the better boat, no? And that's what we have to assume for the sake of a discussion like this: All else (e.g.: maintenance/condition) being equal.
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
Sponsored Links
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 06-14-2007
Brezzin's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 369
Rep Power: 6
Brezzin is on a distinguished road
Send a message via AIM to Brezzin
Quote:
Originally Posted by SEMIJim
Thanks for the detailed comments, Dave. I think that's just what I was seeking.

So if I'm seeking a good used boat on a relatively tight budget, I'm looking for a "late 70's" (would that be '78 & 79', then?) thru '82 Hunter, it seems. (No earlier than '77 and no later than '83, at the outside?)

Jim
I like the Cherb's between 80 and 82. I don't much like anything else that Hunter put out before or after. Until you get to the later/larger models.
__________________
Dave
s/v "eclipse"
Mystic CT
2007 Hunter 49

Man is not free unless government is limited. There's a clear cause and effect here that is a neat and predictable as a law of physics: As government expands, liberty contracts. -Ronald Reagan
.
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 06-14-2007
SEMIJim's Avatar
Last Grumpy Old Sailor
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: S.E. Michigan, USA
Posts: 2,560
Rep Power: 6
SEMIJim will become famous soon enough SEMIJim will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by sailh34
It is not a Tartan or a Sabre.
I gather, by that, your opinion is that both Tartan and Sabre are generally, or more consistently of better quality. I'm thinking that maybe I best stay with them, then.
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 06-14-2007
SEMIJim's Avatar
Last Grumpy Old Sailor
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: S.E. Michigan, USA
Posts: 2,560
Rep Power: 6
SEMIJim will become famous soon enough SEMIJim will become famous soon enough
And btw: I sincerely apologize for potentially reviving an apparently long-standing flame-war subject . I should've searched on the subject, first. It's not like I'm a 'net n00b and don't know any better.

Anybody that wants to comment but would prefer to avoid entangling themselves in a food fight: Feel free to PM me with your comments, if you're so-inclined.
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 06-14-2007
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: VA
Posts: 29
Rep Power: 0
sailh34 is on a distinguished road
Quality and Price

Yes, I don't think anyone would disagree that Tartans and Sabres of the same vintage of any Hunter is of higher quality. You will, however, pay for that quality. Those boats of the same vintage will likely cost twice that of the Hunter. It is what you want to pay for and what you want to use the boat for that is important. If that is what you want and/or need, go with the more expensive boat.
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 06-14-2007
camaraderie's Avatar
moderate?
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: East Coast
Posts: 13,899
Rep Power: 12
camaraderie is a jewel in the rough camaraderie is a jewel in the rough camaraderie is a jewel in the rough
I agree with Dave's assessment of Cherubini vs. later Hunters. I disagree about things changing when henderson arrived in 1997. He MAY be making a difference NOW on a few NEW models (time will tell) but I see no evidence of improvement in any of their previous designs OR build quality right up to about 2004.
I've seen enough comments about changes in the 3 newest models to believe that there may be some much better boats NOW...but with 20+ years of cutting corners...pardon me if I wait a couple of more to see how the new ones hold up.
If all you're gonna do is bay sailing...anything will do but I would personally rather have a similar sized Catalina or Beneteau (certain models only!) if I were buying a used production boat unless you are looking at Cherubini's.
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 06-14-2007
Cruisingdad's Avatar
Best Looking Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: SW Florida
Posts: 8,254
Rep Power: 10
Cruisingdad has a spectacular aura about Cruisingdad has a spectacular aura about Cruisingdad has a spectacular aura about
I agree with Cam. If you are looking at those numbers, look at a Bene or Catalina. Seriuosly!

- CD
__________________
Sailnet Adminstrator & Moderator
Catalina 400 Technical Editor

Catalina 400, HN#289
Com-Pac 16

Are you trying to talk your spouse or family into cruising or sailing? Want to know what it is like, every day? Click here and enjoy:
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 06-14-2007
SEMIJim's Avatar
Last Grumpy Old Sailor
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: S.E. Michigan, USA
Posts: 2,560
Rep Power: 6
SEMIJim will become famous soon enough SEMIJim will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cruisingdad
I agree with Cam. If you are looking at those numbers, look at a Bene or Catalina. Seriuosly!

- CD
We were looking at mid-70's Catalina 27's, but found their cabin amenities unsuitable. So we've upped the budget and have been looking at 28-30' boats. Really like the Sabre 28. But, while there seem to be plenty of those in good-to-excellent condition elsewhere in the country, there seems to be a dearth of them in the S.E. Michigan area--even the Great Lakes area, in total . Looked at a couple Bene's on-line and they were priced well outside our budget ($15k). I think if we just wait for what we want, we should be able to find something we'll love in a Sabre, Tartan or Pearson. (Those are three for which I've seen high praise for quality, pretty-much consistently, along with C&C.) I've seen some likely-looking Pearson candidates, but my wife doesn't like 'em, for some reason . So the search continues.

We've only been at it for about three weeks or so. Looks like this is going to take a lot of patience.
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What where the quality control issue years for Hunter? CharlieCobra Boat Review and Purchase Forum 15 04-23-2007 02:31 PM
Evaulation of Hudson Force 50 build quality laviesailor Boat Review and Purchase Forum 2 12-27-2006 12:46 AM
build quality maiden Boat Review and Purchase Forum 5 03-29-2004 07:47 PM
Jeanneau quality is fine (Jeff H) JHodor Boat Review and Purchase Forum 7 12-28-2003 03:38 PM
The Hunter 420 Micca Hutchins Buying a Boat Articles 0 10-07-1999 09:00 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:09 PM.

Add to My Yahoo!         
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0
(c) Sailnet 2000-2006