Hunter Build Quality? - SailNet Community
 1Likes
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 65 Old 06-14-2007 Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,708
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 10
   
Hunter Build Quality?

I'm kind of confused on this issue. IIRC, I've seen three different opinions expressed: 1. "Early Hunters were well-built. Later ones not so well-built." 2. "Late 70's, early 80's were well-built." (Presumably meaning anything earlier or later is not so great? Or is "late 70's/early 80's" the same as "early Hunters?") 3. Only the later Hunters are good boats.

Since my wife likes the lines of the Hunters we've seen (on line and in RL), and, I found out last night, doesn't like Pearsons (!), I must resign myself to qualifying the period in which I might expect to find the best build quality for Hunter sailing craft. (I must admit: Some of the cabin layouts and accommodations I've seen in some of the Hunters we've looked at on-line sure look nice.)

(To me: Competent engineering and high build quality trumps everything but my ability to pay, regardless of the product.)

Btw: We're looking at 28-30' racer/cruiser or performance cruiser boats. (I think. Seems to be quite a gray area.)

TIA,
Jim
SEMIJim is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 65 Old 06-14-2007
Wandering Aimlessly
 
PBzeer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Cruising
Posts: 21,231
Thanks: 0
Thanked 94 Times in 91 Posts
Rep Power: 15
     
Which Hunters does she like the lines of? You aren't quite clear on that point.

John
Ontario 32 - Aria

Free, is the heart, that lives not, in fear.
Full, is the spirit, that thinks not, of falling.
True, is the soul, that hesitates not, to give.
Alive, is the one, that believes, in love.
JCP


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
- Website & Blog

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
PBzeer is online now  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #3 of 65 Old 06-14-2007 Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,708
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 10
   
Quote:
Originally Posted by PBzeer
Which Hunters does she like the lines of? You aren't quite clear on that point.
We've looked at so many boats on-line in the last two-or-three weeks, I really couldn't say, except for "the 28-30' Hunters we've seen." Sorry.
SEMIJim is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #4 of 65 Old 06-14-2007
Senior Member
 
Brezzin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 379
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Rep Power: 9
 
In the late 70's to around 1982 a lot of hunters were designed by a well highly respected designer named John Cherubini. BTW Cherubini designs are very recognizable. 1981 Cherubini 33
These boats were well made.

In the mid 80's and well into the 90's Hunter as well as many other builders (Hunter specifically) suffered through high interest rates, High costs for petroleum products so they felt that they could stay solvent by producing more boats cheaply. Essentially through economies of scale. This turned out not so good. It’s not that all the Hunters produced during this time frame were bad boats but they had a good percentage of them that were not so good. You also have to keep in mind that Hunter has been the one of the highest volume builders in the world and still is. Because of this you will hear more negative things simply because there are more of them. You also must remember that any used boat is only as good as the PO maintained it and Hunter, through aggressive pricing sold a lot of boats to people who didn’t know squat about boating and maintaining systems. That didn’t help the brand either.
In the late 90’s Hunter began to design boats under Glenn Henderson and build to the same certification standard that all the other builders meet and lately, even to CE standards.
jayncee likes this.

Dave
s/v "eclipse"
Mystic CT
2007 Hunter 49
Brezzin is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #5 of 65 Old 06-14-2007 Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,708
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 10
   
Thanks for the detailed comments, Dave. I think that's just what I was seeking.

So if I'm seeking a good used boat on a relatively tight budget, I'm looking for a "late 70's" (would that be '78 & 79', then?) thru '82 Hunter, it seems. (No earlier than '77 and no later than '83, at the outside?)

Jim
SEMIJim is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #6 of 65 Old 06-14-2007
Sea Slacker
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,789
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 9
 
By the age of boats you are looking for, initial build quality matters much less (unless manufacturer did something extremely different, either bad or good). So, don't worry about build quality much. Worry about particular condition of a particular boat. They are all different and all have different problems. Anything build in that timeframe will definitely have a whole laundry list.
brak is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #7 of 65 Old 06-14-2007
ASA and PSIA Instructor
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 3,589
Thanks: 7
Thanked 25 Times in 25 Posts
Rep Power: 16
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by SEMIJim
......Since my wife likes the lines of the Hunters we've seen (on line and in RL), and, I found out last night, doesn't like Pearsons (!), I must resign myself to qualifying the period in which I might expect to find the best build quality for Hunter sailing craft. .....

(To me: Competent engineering and high build quality trumps everything but my ability to pay, regardless of the product.)
....
TIA,
Jim
The Hunter subject has produced the largest number of flame wars on this board, as some (por many) participants like me have a very dim view of Hunter. Regardless of probable outbursts, I'll again say my thing...I believe Hunter has consistently made lousy boats, some models not as lousy as others.

Now everyone has a right to their opinion, some people think more of Hunters than I, some apparently like them, but I don't think you'd find a general consensus that "competent engineering and high build quality" is a consistent or even common charachteristic of that builder. The review at Boat Review* by David Pascoe - Hunter 28 provides some insight.
sailingfool is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #8 of 65 Old 06-14-2007
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Seaside, Florida
Posts: 3,332
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 10
   
The early and mid-80s Hunter 31s have some problems. A friend of mine nearly bought one, only to find out the steering quandrant was all f---ed up, and the draft was something incredible -- over 6' if I remember right. The decks had huge soft spots... the list of things went on and on...
sailhog is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #9 of 65 Old 06-14-2007
Senior Member
 
poopdeckpappy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 6,196
Thanks: 35
Thanked 42 Times in 36 Posts
Rep Power: 12
     
All I can say is, I have a 07 45CC and so far so good, although it IS only intended for coastal cruising; We are however looking at a Tayana 37 now and if that works out the Hunter will go..............we shall see

1955 Blanchard 51 Custom ( I got a woody )

1974 Ranger 33


Lord, give me coffee to change the things I can change and Rum to accept the things I can't
poopdeckpappy is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #10 of 65 Old 06-14-2007
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: VA
Posts: 29
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 0
 
I have a 1987 Hunter and it is just fine. I would not cross an ocean in it, but sure have a lot of fun on it. It is not a Tartan or a Sabre. Get a survey, if it is fine and you like it and it sails well, get it. Quality problems will show up by now in the survey or be fixed.
sailh34 is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

By choosing to post the reply above you agree to the rules you agreed to when joining Sailnet.
Click Here to view those rules.

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the SailNet Community forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
Please note: After entering 3 characters a list of Usernames already in use will appear and the list will disappear once a valid Username is entered.


User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What where the quality control issue years for Hunter? CharlieCobra Boat Review and Purchase Forum 15 04-23-2007 01:31 PM
Evaulation of Hudson Force 50 build quality laviesailor Boat Review and Purchase Forum 2 12-26-2006 11:46 PM
build quality maiden Boat Review and Purchase Forum 5 03-29-2004 06:47 PM
Jeanneau quality is fine (Jeff H) JHodor Boat Review and Purchase Forum 4 12-28-2003 01:28 AM
The Hunter 420 Micca Hutchins Buying a Boat Articles 0 10-07-1999 08:00 PM

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome