
10-07-2007
|
 |
Telstar 28
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: New England
Posts: 43,315
Rep Power: 11
|
|
BTW, the standard for libel or slander, at least in the United States, is one of legal actual malice—actual malice means that the information provided was provided with a reckless disregard for its veracity or was known to be substantially untrue. Any first-hand personal account of a situation is probably protected by the qualified defense of truth, provided the first-hand account gives full disclosure of the events. The best defense against libel/slander is qualified privilege, which is generally not a defense available to private citizens... Qualified privilege is usually a defense used by journalists.
If one has taken time to verify or substantiate the information, then it is very unlikely that a case for libel or slander could be made. However, even if the information is completely verified and true, you can still be sued for slander or libel and rack up fairly large court costs defending yourself.
__________________
Sailingdog
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Telstar 28
New England
You know what the first rule of sailing is? ...Love. You can learn all the math in the 'verse, but you take
a boat to the sea you don't love, she'll shake you off just as sure as the turning of the worlds. Love keeps
her going when she oughta fall down, tells you she's hurting 'fore she keens. Makes her a home.
—Cpt. Mal Reynolds, Serenity (edited)
If you're new to the Sailnet Forums... please read this To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts..
Still—DON'T READ THAT POST AGAIN.
|