- Quick Menu
-
|

05-01-2008
|
|
Junior Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 14
Rep Power: 0
|
|
|
Catalina 34 or 36 ??? (early 90's)
I m looking at both, for a 8 to 12 month cruise in the Caribbean.
I'm finding the 36 almost the same in price as the 34. Is either model built to a higher standard than the other? Is the layout of the 36 that much roomier? How about sailing characteristics beteween them?
Thanks for your time
|

05-01-2008
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Seaside, Florida
Posts: 3,319
Rep Power: 7
|
|
|
Devilfish,
I've been looking at the same boats for the same purpose. I've been aboard a couple C36s, but have yet to see a C34 "in person," as it were. My general sense is that the C34 is a bit more solid. For instance, the bulkheads on the C36 are not tabbed, and I've heard that its pretty loud below while underway. The fellow on this forum you want to hear from is TommyT. He owns a C34 and is based on Lake Michigan. He's been in some heavy weather in his boat, and claims it's tougher than he is.
|

05-01-2008
|
 |
the pointy end is the bow
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: La Conner, Washington
Posts: 4,821
Rep Power: 7
|
|
We had a C-34 and just loved it. It shares much of the same hardware with the 36 but we liked the 34's use of space better. They have a great owners forum that may have the answers to your questions in the FAQ section.
The Catalina 34 International Association
__________________
Ray
S.V. Nikko
1983 Fraser 41
La Conner, WA
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Boating for over 25 years, some of them successfully.
|

05-01-2008
|
 |
Just another Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: New Westminster, BC
Posts: 9,263
Rep Power: 9
|
|
|
While I was unaware that the C36 bulkheads were installed differently than the C34, we've always preferred the C36 layout with the second small "dinette" option, esp for family cruising.
Another issue I've heard of re the C36 is the mast step construction and the possible failure of a support "box" for the mast step. Whether or not the C34 addressed this potential trouble spot I'm not sure.
We have many C34s in our club and all owners seem very satisfied with them.
__________________
".. there is much you could do at sea with common sense.. and very little you could do without it.."
Capt G E Ericson (from "The Cruel Sea" by Nicholas Monsarrat)
1984 Fast/Nicholson 345
|

05-01-2008
|
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Michigan
Posts: 555
Rep Power: 0
|
|
|
The two boats are almost identical in equipment and construction. There is only about a foot difference LOA when you get down to actual measurement. The cockpit IS identical on same year boats. Catalina does a lot to keep things pretty standard over time. It keeps their costs down, and therefore yours as well. If you have a specific construction question do not hesitate to ask it at the two organizations listed below, or call Catalina directly. They are very good about answering owners, and prospective owners, questions. You may even end up with Frank Butler on the line.
At the C34 and C36 organizations you will find people that love their boats. They belong to the boards because they are a wealth of information and a mutual admiration society all in one. The boats are used for many different purposes. They will take a beating if you keep them maintained. They should be fine for your intended purpose. Would I cross the Atlantic in one...no thanks. However, I don't intend to cross it anyway, so I have a C34.
These are coastal cruisers, so storage is always an issue. It is in most 34-38 foot boats. If you are a couple, and the decision is between these two boats with condition being equal, make the decision sitting in the salon. That is 98% of the difference between the two. I think the V is a couple of inches smaller in the C36's I have sailed, and I prefer the C34 aft berth ( which again is just about identical to the C36 as it is under the identical cockpit) so let the admiral decide which salon she likes. It really depends how much time you spend in the salon and how you will want to use it. Sailing the boat, and especially sitting in the cockpit, you cannot tell the difference in similarly rigged boats.
|

05-01-2008
|
|
Junior Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 14
Rep Power: 0
|
|
|
Thanks for the replies. So where is the extra 2 feet if not in the cockpit or the sleeping areas?
From TommyT 's answer it seems so far that the 34 is the better better. Especially factoring in maintence, larger engine, larger sails, etc..
Do they sail the same also?
Thanks again
|

05-01-2008
|
 |
the pointy end is the bow
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: La Conner, Washington
Posts: 4,821
Rep Power: 7
|
|
|
The C-34 is actually a 35' boat.
__________________
Ray
S.V. Nikko
1983 Fraser 41
La Conner, WA
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Boating for over 25 years, some of them successfully.
|

05-01-2008
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 4,926
Rep Power: 8
|
|
They will probably sail similar in speed, when comparing equal keel or sail plans, ie both being shoal draft std rig's. If comparing a shoal draft std rig 36 to a deep draft tall rig 34, assuming this comparison is valid, the 34 will/should be faster better sailing especially in light winds.
Looking here is US Sailings listing of 4100 boats types, and there PHRF ratings, from a high/low/ave prospective. Both the 34 and 36 seem to have 135-160 high low ratings across the board, with not much difference when comparing equally setup boats.
To me, that is like tommy says, find the one that is best for you, best condition, and do not look back as far as which one you should have gotten. On one hand tho, that extra 2' is more cost in moorrage ea month, more for haulouts, bottom paint etc too!
Enjoy your new boat, no matter what you get. You might also look at the Jeanneau Sun Odyssey line as another option too. I'm sure there are some others that folks like too, such as Bendy's, hunters etc.
marty
__________________
She drives me boat,
I drives me dinghy!
|

05-01-2008
|
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Michigan
Posts: 555
Rep Power: 0
|
|
|
BLT2SKI ( by the way, is that snow or water ski?) is correct. Just depends on keel and sail plan configuration. Comparing one wing with standard rig 34/36, they sail the same. For your needs with fairly consistent winds the standard rig will be fine. I prefer the Tall Rig for sainling in the Great Lakes, as the lakes big secret is that diesel is often needed.
My 34 LOA is 34'6". I think that the 36 is 35'9" so little difference. Almost every bit of that 12-15" is in the salon. Both boats have really only had a couple of iterations. The main change being in the early 90's when the sugar scoop was phased in. Other than that you would be hard pressed to see the differences in the hull if looking at the boat from the beam. They have made a couple of thousand of each, and got pretty good at it. There are those that think that they are pretty much a lousy "production" boat, but search some of my old threads for what our boat has been through from us and a charterer. They do take a beating and survive.
The 36 has just been discontinued to create room for the 375, and I would be very surprised if the 34 was not discontinued in the near future. Bottom line is the market is calling for boats that are more dock condo's than anything else. Look at the 350 if you want to see one. I personally hate the boat, as it feels like a Motorhome from the inside. On the other hand, on a rainy day at the dock with kids/grandkids driving you nuts, I love it.
Good Luck.
|

05-01-2008
|
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Michigan
Posts: 555
Rep Power: 0
|
|
|
OH, missed a few.
I think that maintenance will be a non factor on these two boats. Unless you count the extra foot of bottom paint and waxing each year. The engine is the same Universal M35B I think, same as they use in the 350. Sail plan is not that much different. In fact, there is more area in a 34 Tall than a 36 Regular.
Bottom line, look at the salon and make your decision. For my use I actually like the 36 salon with the small dinette on the port side better than the 34. If you are only two most of the time, you can then make the dining table on the starboard side into a cocktail size table and make the interior even more user friendly.
Our boat is in a charter fleet. We actually made the decision to go with the 34 because the aft berth in the 36 has a section that comes down lower at the stern than the 34. Go figure, I still don't know why. However, with charterers they may want to turn over once in a while at the stern. If you are sailing as a couple, the aft berth will become a garage. Won't have to worry about turning over.
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:55 PM.
|