Oceanis v. First Series? - SailNet Community

   Search Sailnet:

 forums  store  


Quick Menu
Forums           
Articles          
Galleries        
Boat Reviews  
Classifieds     
Search SailNet 
Boat Search (new)

Shop the
SailNet Store
Anchor Locker
Boatbuilding & Repair
Charts
Clothing
Electrical
Electronics
Engine
Hatches and Portlights
Interior And Galley
Maintenance
Marine Electronics
Navigation
Other Items
Plumbing and Pumps
Rigging
Safety
Sailing Hardware
Trailer & Watersports
Clearance Items

Advertise Here






Go Back   SailNet Community > On Board > Boat Review and Purchase Forum
 Not a Member? 


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 08-01-2008
danielgoldberg's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: New York
Posts: 679
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Rep Power: 7
danielgoldberg is on a distinguished road
Oceanis v. First Series?

OK, I'm now a Beneteau head. I admit it. That's the first step, isn't it? Admitting you have a problem.

I've read in several places, including here, that the First series supposedly is a bit better built than the rest of the Beneteau line. I have been trying to figure out the basis for that conclusion, but to no avail.

I actually went to Beneteau, and the answer I got was that the boats are built exactly the same way, and that there is no difference in build quality. The difference, mainly, is a few things, which are:

1. Style and naval architect (Farr has done a lot of the First series boats), which also tends to result in the First series being more narrow, deeper draft, etc., as you might expect on a more performance oriented line.

2. Lead keel on the First series. (As a total aside, did you all know that J's most recent creation, the J122, has a steel keel and only the bulb at the bottom is lead?)

3. Oceanis has more standard and optional equipment, and generally has more "stuff."

4. No roller furling main on the First series.

5. The First series of 40 and up all are made in France, which I'm told explains the price differential (exchange rate and more expensive to ship). I'm advised that in Europe the First series is no more expensive than the Oceanis. I haven't researched that at all on my own.

6. The rudders fall off of all the Oceanis boats. Just kidding.

Other than that, I'm told the boats are built the exact same way. Same construction methods, liners (yuck), hull to deck joint, deck coring, everything.

So, that leaves me with the question, where does it come from that the First series are higher quality on the build end?
__________________
Dan Goldberg

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
  #2  
Old 08-01-2008
JohnRPollard's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Chesapeake
Posts: 5,680
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Rep Power: 10
JohnRPollard is a jewel in the rough JohnRPollard is a jewel in the rough JohnRPollard is a jewel in the rough
Quote:
Originally Posted by danielgoldberg View Post
So, that leaves me with the question, where does it come from that the First series are higher quality on the build end?
It's funny, but I've heard the opposite stated more than a few times, usually in reference to the older First series boats ('80s-'90s).

On the other hand, my impression of the newer First Series boats is that they are better designed and engineered (to be light and strong for competitive racing), not necessarily better quality construction. It just seems like they get more attention to design and engineering details than the cruising oriented Beneteau/Oceanis series.

But for cruising, I'd rather have the amenities found on the Beneteau/Oceanis series, if only they'd drop the cast iron keel.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Pacific Seacraft Crealock 31 #62

NEVER CALLS CRUISINGDAD BACK....CAN"T TAKE THE ACCENT
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
  #3  
Old 08-01-2008
sailingdog's Avatar
Telstar 28
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: New England
Posts: 43,291
Thanks: 0
Thanked 10 Times in 10 Posts
Rep Power: 13
sailingdog is just really nice sailingdog is just really nice sailingdog is just really nice sailingdog is just really nice sailingdog is just really nice
Quote:
Originally Posted by danielgoldberg View Post
OK, I'm now a Beneteau head. I admit it. That's the first step, isn't it? Admitting you have a problem.

I've read in several places, including here, that the First series supposedly is a bit better built than the rest of the Beneteau line. I have been trying to figure out the basis for that conclusion, but to no avail.

I actually went to Beneteau, and the answer I got was that the boats are built exactly the same way, and that there is no difference in build quality. The difference, mainly, is a few things, which are:
They're all still BendyToys...

Quote:
1. Style and naval architect (Farr has done a lot of the First series boats), which also tends to result in the First series being more narrow, deeper draft, etc., as you might expect on a more performance oriented line.
Some people equate higher performance with higher quality... so that might be where some of it is coming from.

Quote:
2. Lead keel on the First series. (As a total aside, did you all know that J's most recent creation, the J122, has a steel keel and only the bulb at the bottom is lead?)
Again, this is a performance thing... a steel keel with lead bulb makes perfect sense. The steel is needed for the strength in the keel strut, and the lead for the denser ballast and less wetted area, due to the higher ballast density.

Quote:
3. Oceanis has more standard and optional equipment, and generally has more "stuff."
More stuff generally leads one to believe it is a "better" boat.

Quote:
4. No roller furling main on the First series.
Again, not surprising, since the First series is more performance oriented. I haven't seen any racing boats that had roller furling mains yet either.

Quote:
5. The First series of 40 and up all are made in France, which I'm told explains the price differential (exchange rate and more expensive to ship). I'm advised that in Europe the First series is no more expensive than the Oceanis. I haven't researched that at all on my own.
They probably have better quality control over the boats built in France as well. I doubt they're the same price as the Oceanis series, since the lead and other stuff a First has costs money...

Quote:
6. The rudders fall off of all the Oceanis boats. Just kidding.
I thought it was true of all BendyToys.

Quote:
Other than that, I'm told the boats are built the exact same way. Same construction methods, liners (yuck), hull to deck joint, deck coring, everything.

So, that leaves me with the question, where does it come from that the First series are higher quality on the build end?
It would be strange to change the production methods and such between the two lines. What may change is the quality of the materials used. Lead versus Iron/Steel for the keel, Carbon Fiber and Kevlar in addition to just fiberglass for the hull laminates, etc.
__________________
Sailingdog

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Telstar 28
New England

You know what the first rule of sailing is? ...Love. You can learn all the math in the 'verse, but you take
a boat to the sea you don't love, she'll shake you off just as sure as the turning of the worlds. Love keeps
her going when she oughta fall down, tells you she's hurting 'fore she keens. Makes her a home.

óCpt. Mal Reynolds, Serenity (edited)

If you're new to the Sailnet Forums... please read this
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
.

StillóDON'T READ THAT POST AGAIN.
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
  #4  
Old 08-01-2008
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Pacific NW
Posts: 58
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 0
seawitch1906 is on a distinguished road
Cool First series ...Oceanis ..

Build in the US .. all of them, except the new f45 and 50 .. for know..
second there is no better quality over there or here ..all is a same good quality , you really believe Beneteau would allow less quality here??? NO they are not..
same construction , except 10R , and all models are very very good sail boats,
finally not last all molds made in France , and quality controlled by ever hull ..

First series more 1 class oriented , race friendly , Oceanis more cruising amenities ..
last , all production boat has now iron keels , due to cost ... all over the world ..
reshaping the foil, no disadvantage at all ..

go sailing !
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
  #5  
Old 08-01-2008
JohnRPollard's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Chesapeake
Posts: 5,680
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Rep Power: 10
JohnRPollard is a jewel in the rough JohnRPollard is a jewel in the rough JohnRPollard is a jewel in the rough
Quote:
Originally Posted by seawitch1906 View Post
last , all production boat has now iron keels , due to cost ... all over the world ..
reshaping the foil, no disadvantage at all ..
Seawitch, you make many good points, but I will disagree with the last. In the U.S., anyway, all of the high-quality builders still use lead as ballast.

Also, I would argue that there are disadvantages to using cast iron as ballast. From a design standpoint, more volume of iron is required to achieve the same ballast weight/righting moment as lead, so the boat will either have more wetted surface and/or a deeper draft with cast iron ballast. From cost-of-ownership standpoint, all you need to do is walk around a boatyard in winter and see all the rusting cast-iron keels, epoxy coatings notwithstanding. It is a maintenance headache, and in my book a false economy.

My strong preference is lead ballast. But I wouldn't completely rule out a boat with cast iron.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Pacific Seacraft Crealock 31 #62

NEVER CALLS CRUISINGDAD BACK....CAN"T TAKE THE ACCENT
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
  #6  
Old 08-01-2008
blt2ski's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 6,694
Thanks: 0
Thanked 21 Times in 20 Posts
Rep Power: 10
blt2ski will become famous soon enough
Take your pick per your type of sailing one does. Personally, i would trust myself in a first over an oceanus in more conditions ie sea or wind state.

Then from there, as mentioned, both will cruise reasonably well, but the first will generally speaking, be a faster boat length for length. I also prefer to do some beer can racing etc, so the first series is a better design/built boat for "my" needs and wants. Generally speaking, they have winch sizes one larger for equal sized boats, one or two more on the cabin top, adjustible genoa cars via lines, vs pinstops. Cockpit mounted travellers vs cabin top, and typically a better pull ratio with micro on a first vs oceanus.

Again, it is a what do you want in your boat. John's PSC31 does nothing for me, while it is a very nice boat, it does not fit my needs, where as a first series or equal style boat would and does. that is probably why I have a Tony Castro designed Jeanneau Arcadia, a fast cruiser racer to a racer cruiser in style. With many of the items I mentioned earlier. If i were to buy a new boat today, the F36.7 is on my short list, along with an X35, Dehler 34r, Possibly the X34 or 37 among others. The Jeanneau Sunfast 3200 looks pretty sweet too. All have drafts over 6-6.5', so those on the east coast may not like them too well!

Marty
__________________
She drives me boat,
I drives me dinghy!
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
  #7  
Old 08-01-2008
JohnRPollard's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Chesapeake
Posts: 5,680
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Rep Power: 10
JohnRPollard is a jewel in the rough JohnRPollard is a jewel in the rough JohnRPollard is a jewel in the rough
Quote:
Originally Posted by blt2ski View Post
John's PSC31 does nothing for me, while it is a very nice boat, it does not fit my needs, where as a first series or equal style boat would and does. that is probably why I have a Tony Castro designed Jeanneau Arcadia, a fast cruiser racer to a racer cruiser in style. With many of the items I mentioned earlier. If i were to buy a new boat today, the F36.7 is on my short list, along with an X35, Dehler 34r, Possibly the X34 or 37 among others. The Jeanneau Sunfast 3200 looks pretty sweet too. All have drafts over 6-6.5', so those on the east coast may not like them too well!

Marty
Yeah, Marty, it's hard to find one boat that does it all well. Having logged plenty of time on racer/cruisers, I now lean away from boats that try to compromise too much. Our boat is a cruiser, and while it gives a surprising turn of speed on passage, it makes no pretenses to be a racer. If racing is what I wanted to do again, I'd probably get another Melges 24 or move up to a Melges 32.

That said, I actually do really like the F36.7. However, my nod would go first to the the new 10R design. It seems to focus better on its priority purpose of racing, and as Seawitch mentioned, the 10R incorporates some improved construction techniques.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Pacific Seacraft Crealock 31 #62

NEVER CALLS CRUISINGDAD BACK....CAN"T TAKE THE ACCENT
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
  #8  
Old 08-01-2008
Jeff_H's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Annapolis, Md
Posts: 6,579
Thanks: 5
Thanked 95 Times in 71 Posts
Rep Power: 10
Jeff_H has a spectacular aura about Jeff_H has a spectacular aura about Jeff_H has a spectacular aura about
I am certainly one of those people who have said that I thought the Beneteau First series was better built than the Oceanis (number series) but that was based on comments made by some of Farr's people who discussed the differences between the in-house engineered boats and the boats done by Farr's office. My opinion was also based on a side by side tour with one of the Beneteau USA guys, in which we looked at things like the wider faying surfaces on the First vs Number series, the hand glassed in bulkheads and stringers on the First Series vs the glued in bulkheads and lack of stringers on the number series. And so it went with frame spacing, deck hardware, rigging size and connections. So I don't who at Beneteau told you that the boats were built the same because the Beneteau guy who walked me through the side by side observation pointed out how they are clearly different.

Respectfully,
Jeff
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
  #9  
Old 08-01-2008
blt2ski's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 6,694
Thanks: 0
Thanked 21 Times in 20 Posts
Rep Power: 10
blt2ski will become famous soon enough
John,

No issues on which of the two, ie 36.7 or the 10r(34r in Europe) as to which is more high tech! BUT, I think you will find, or at least I have the 10r to be a be more sparten inside, along with smaller etc, so the 36.7 to be more cruise oriented. ALA to me, similar to the J105 vs the J109. While similar in speed, definetly different in how they are equipped interior wise!

I do hope, as it seems, that you did not take offense to my quip about your boat, a beautiful boat for what it was built as, but like a lot of things, not what I look for at this time in my life! Maybe in another 15-20 yrs!

To me, the oceanus looks like a modern day Bayliner Buccaneer that can at least sail! That shows what they look and feel like to me! LOL

marty
__________________
She drives me boat,
I drives me dinghy!
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
  #10  
Old 08-01-2008
danielgoldberg's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: New York
Posts: 679
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Rep Power: 7
danielgoldberg is on a distinguished road
[QUOTE=Jeff_H;348791]I am certainly one of those people who have said that I thought the Beneteau First series was better built than the Oceanis (number series) QUOTE]

Hey Jeff. Hope all's good by you. Yup, you were one of the people I was thinking about. I didn't get the guy's name, and should have I guess. I placed a call to the factory to ask, and spoke to someone in customer service. The information and impression I was getting from him was precisely the opposite of what you're saying. Query whether there has been a change in the production methodology to make the two lines on par since you spoke to whoever you spoke with. Either that, or the guy I spoke with was, shall we say, less than accurate.

I will say that, at least now, the bulkheads are tabbed and not merely glued in place in the Oceanis series. Likewise, the hull to deck joint now is an inward turning flange and I am advised is the same as the First series, which once was not the case.

SD, I agree completely about the basis for the J122 keel, and I'm sure that's exactly why they did it. Smaller cord, and still get more weight lower. "BendyToy." It still sounds like something you'd find in an adult novelty shop.
__________________
Dan Goldberg

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

 
Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may post attachments
You may edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Product Reviews Cruisingdad Gear & Maintenance 121 05-27-2014 02:02 PM
Battening down for heavy weather sailaway21 Seamanship & Navigation 73 03-27-2007 03:37 AM
New Annapolis Single/Double handed race series Jeff_H Racing 1 04-30-2004 03:03 AM
Titanís Viper Series Winch Handle Dan Dickison Racing Articles 0 10-05-2000 08:00 PM
Race FiveóNZ Sweeps Series Bruce Kirby Racing Articles 0 03-01-2000 07:00 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:42 AM.

Add to My Yahoo!         
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1
(c) Marine.com LLC 2000-2012

The SailNet.com store is owned and operated by a company independent of the SailNet.com forum. You are now leaving the SailNet forum. Click OK to continue or Cancel to return to the SailNet forum.