Really cheap Mac 25 vs. cheap Rhodes 22 ?? - SailNet Community
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 8 Old 11-13-2010 Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
sealover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 357
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 8
 
Really cheap Mac 25 vs. cheap Rhodes 22 ??

I presently sail (and enjoy) a Venture 17. Half of the time I'm solo. Most sailings are at the local dammed river - a 1 x 6 mile lake with constant current. I launch at a public ramp and use fenders and a pair of dock lines to either use (or fight) the current to hold the boat on (or off) the finger pier while I park the truck. The 800 lb. 17' I can maneuver easily enough.

I really like the Rhodes 22 and pretty much see it as perfect for what I need and want. But they are hard to find and really expensive.

I have located an early 80's with in-mast furling for a good price. It's the absolute most I'm able to spend on a boat. I have also found an early 80's Macgregor 25 for 1/4 the cost of the Rhodes. It needs a few things but they are well within my areas of experience (cleaning, motor, woodworking, trailer)

It has no galley (apparently they were removable) but I'm pretty sure I could build one or just use a camping cookstove and cooler.

Both seem to have ample room and a private head area. Both have pop tops, but the Mac comes with the canvas cover to make better use of it when camping. (I'm 6' tall)

They are 3' different in length but they weigh pretty much the same. The Rhodes comes with the slick single-axle sail-right-onto-it self-aligning trailer. The Mac has a dual-axle trailer from something else and sits very high on the trailer -- something I'd have to fix before I could even think of launching it on the shallow ramps we have here.

Some things I'm not sure of -- would the 25 be "too much" to rig, launch (in current) and sail solo?

Can the Mac be sailed with the pop top up?

I read about quality issues with the Macs but the complaints are never specific, and usually from people who have never owned one. Based on my '73 17 footer they don't exactly seem overbuilt but I've given mine a pounding in 25+ mph winds and 4-6' waves at the mouth of the Potomac and aside from literally blowing a batten out of the sail I had NO problems with the boat. (And one heck of a good time!)

If the Mac is built "just strong enough" then the Rhodes must be "overbuilt to an extreme"

25 vs. 22. Easily affordable, with money left for improvements vs. draining my hobby fund. Needs work vs. ready to sail. Suitable boat I'd likely enjoy vs. Ideal boat that has the options I desire. (IMF)

And much of my sailing is done on weekday afternoons after work -- the quicker I can rig and launch it, the more time I have to sail. I've got my Venture 17 down to 20 minutes from arriving to ramp-ready. The brochure for the Mac25 says "15 minutes" which means it's probably 30?

Any thoughts? suggestions? Is there something I'm not considering?

Boat-for-sale season is quickly ending here in southern PA. Prices and selection seem to double in the Spring. Very sure I can sell my 17 in the Spring for what I'd pay for the 25 right now. If I don't buy anything I'll likely end up putting some money into my 17 for next season but still won't have something I can comfortably overnight on with the Mrs. and the dogs.

Keep the expenses low and the good times high.

S/V Waitara
Venture 21
PA Freshwater / Chesapeake
sealover is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 8 Old 11-13-2010
Montgomery 17
 
Perithead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: S/E Alabama
Posts: 384
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Rep Power: 9
 
I had a Mac 25 as my first sailboat. Decent boat and like you said not very overbuilt but probably good enough. I always envied the Rhodes.

The 25 can besailed with the pop top up. At least I could with my rigging configuration.

The trailer problem doesn't sound fun. You will probably end up finding another trailer for it in the end since its not made for the boat it isn't the best, by that I mean quickest too.

I could raise the mast and rig my 25 alone without a mast raising system but it wasn't the easiest. 30 min would be pushing it.

Id try to talk down the Rhodes owner.

Small is beautiful, simple, cheap, and easy......

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Sailing Videos, Woodworking Videos and More!
Perithead is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #3 of 8 Old 11-13-2010
Senior Member
 
bljones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: South Coast Ontario
Posts: 8,484
Thanks: 35
Thanked 93 Times in 82 Posts
Rep Power: 9
   
Buy the Rhodes. You won't regret it. You can pour money into a clapped out Mac that you will never get back (and apparently you need to dump money into the trailer as well- come on, ask yourself, if the guy cut sloppy corners on the trailer, how well did he do anything else on the boat?), or buy a boat that is a) still in production, b) was much better quality to begin with and c) has a fanatical following, parts support and d) you can sail now without work.

Nobody has ever gone wrong buying the best boat they could afford, but a lot of people have given up on "bargains."
bljones is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #4 of 8 Old 11-13-2010
Just another Moderator
 
Faster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: New Westminster, BC
Posts: 18,301
Thanks: 126
Thanked 458 Times in 435 Posts
Rep Power: 10
     
Quote:
Originally Posted by bljones View Post
Buy the Rhodes. You won't regret it. You can pour money into a clapped out Mac that you will never get back (and apparently you need to dump money into the trailer as well- come on, ask yourself, if the guy cut sloppy corners on the trailer, how well did he do anything else on the boat?), or buy a boat that is a) still in production, b) was much better quality to begin with and c) has a fanatical following, parts support and d) you can sail now without work.

Nobody has ever gone wrong buying the best boat they could afford, but a lot of people have given up on "bargains."
Words of wisdom....

Ron

1984 Fast/Nicholson 345 "FastForward"

".. there is much you could do at sea with common sense.. and very little you could do without it.."
Capt G E Ericson (from "The Cruel Sea" by Nicholas Monsarrat)
Faster is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #5 of 8 Old 11-13-2010
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 13
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 0
 
I ownded a Mac/Venture 25 and had it trailered and sailed in AZ and even took it on an overnight from San Diego to Catalina Island, smooth sailing all the way. The thing I have disliked about the vessel was , I called it the leaky demon, Always leaked around the pop-top till I changed all the weather stripping, the swing keel is 500 lbs and if the cable breaks you better have scuba gear to attach it back if you are in the water. If you are in cold water it is freezing inside. I bought mine for 1500 put 600 into it and sold it for 2600. Also the single axle trailer was very unstable past 55. Changed to 2 axles and no problem, also changed the running boards on the trailor to 2X10 for better support . All in all a good starter boat but would not own another.
scubaaz2001 is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #6 of 8 Old 11-13-2010
Senior Member
 
MarkCK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Marco Island Florida
Posts: 521
Thanks: 4
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Rep Power: 8
 
I would want to see pics of the Mac before i would pass judgement on it. There were lightly built boats but if it really just needs a few minor repairs I wouldnt stay away from it. On the other hand the Rhodes 22 has an excellent reputation for a reason. Is it 4x a better boat (cost wise)...?
MarkCK is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #7 of 8 Old 11-13-2010
Senior Member
 
MarkCK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Marco Island Florida
Posts: 521
Thanks: 4
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Rep Power: 8
 
I reread your post. If the Rhodes is your dream boat. Just buy it and call it good.
MarkCK is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #8 of 8 Old 11-13-2010
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 2,092
Thanks: 9
Thanked 44 Times in 41 Posts
Rep Power: 12
 
A Phil Rhodes design is generally a good bet, will keep you safe and sail decently.
nolatom is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

By choosing to post the reply above you agree to the rules you agreed to when joining Sailnet.
Click Here to view those rules.

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the SailNet Community forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
Please note: After entering 3 characters a list of Usernames already in use will appear and the list will disappear once a valid Username is entered.


User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New Gps on the cheap Garffin General Discussion (sailing related) 5 12-21-2009 09:14 AM
Cheap AIS camaraderie Gear & Maintenance 10 07-22-2007 08:48 PM
cheap GPS tadd16 Gear & Maintenance 8 07-02-2006 12:21 PM

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome