Ranger 33 or Ericson 35-2 for Offshore? - Page 2 - SailNet Community
 3Likes
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #11 of 16 Old 07-07-2012
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Lake Champlain
Posts: 17
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 0
 
Re: Ranger 33 or Ericson 35-2 for Offshore?

The numbers look so close they are probably irrelevant. I have a 1976 Ranger 33 that I may take offshore in the future. I like how narrow it is for capsize resistance. I like the bronze through hulls, 0.5"+ thick solid hull, 1.5" thick plywood cored deck, good light air performance, moderate keel, and overall good behavior. However, I have it on a lake so can't comment on offshore abilities. Others have definitely gone from CA to HI and other offshore passages. What concerns me for offshore are: no bridgedeck, narrow sidedecks, limited storage compared to beamier boats (but I'll take lower capsize risk over storage!) and the fact that mine leaks, but I blame that mostly on previous owners not Ranger.
kulokoo likes this.
DamonVT is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #12 of 16 Old 07-08-2012 Thread Starter
Low Salt Diet Sufferer
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 64
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 6
 
Re: Ranger 33 or Ericson 35-2 for Offshore?

I'd think the Ranger 33 might be a good downwind boat, both in speed and tracking. What have your experiences been?

Down wind tracking with quartering seas would seem to be pretty important out in the blue, and the area I wonder most about the Ericson 35-2. But again I've sailed neither.
kulokoo is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #13 of 16 Old 07-08-2012
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Lake Champlain
Posts: 17
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 0
 
Re: Ranger 33 or Ericson 35-2 for Offshore?

I think you're right the downwind speed and tracking are important, but having only sailed the boat one season and a bit this year (I got a late start after putting in an electric motor) in a bay where I'm tacking and turning so much I don't notice tracking, I don't feel I can really comment. If I get a chance to try and take note of that soon I will.
kulokoo likes this.
DamonVT is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #14 of 16 Old 08-26-2012
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 4
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 0
 
Re: Ranger 33 or Ericson 35-2 for Offshore?

Ericson 35 is a solid citizen, albeit a little tender. We sail mostly in LA area, and although winds are fairly light we usually sail with one or two reefs tied in, just to make life easier. More main just tries to bury the rail, without a lot of extra push.
I'm sure there are those who will disagree, and that is what makes forums fun.
CTS: what's all this about SailNet going out of business? I just joined up.
The discussion about that is pretty old, but it seems like forms are still in business. Old news?
harryh3 is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #15 of 16 Old 08-27-2012
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Lake Champlain
Posts: 17
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 0
 
Re: Ranger 33 or Ericson 35-2 for Offshore?

Still no significant downwind experience to report, but I was surprised to find out yesterday that the R33 heaves-to fairly nicely. An inexperienced friend and I had set out early in light wind to beat into it for the better part of a day (after spending the night rolling in the waves at anchor.) We had an 180% genoa on that became too much as the apparent wind probably rose above 15 knots, and the waves averaged 2-3 feet with many around 4 feet. She lost control a couple of times, and the boat hove-to with a very calm motion, drifting at a knot or two straight downwind. The rudder appeared to do nothing in this condition (it was easy to get back to regular sailing by switching the jib to the downwind side.) The only problem is I think it lay beam to the seas. That could hopefully be changed with a different set of sails to change the balance, or different sheeting. We later switched to the storm jib, a process on the bow that made me seasick, and I also accidentally hove-to with that one, and it was also stable and calm hove-to with that combination. I didn't note the angle to the waves, but think it was about beam to as well, which isn't good because I'd think the full main and a storm jib might angle into the wind more. I probably won't have a downwind update for you this year, since we also managed to find some rocks with the keel and let in a little water. The boat got hauled today - I haven't seen the damage yet
DamonVT is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #16 of 16 Old 08-28-2012
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: San Francisco Bay area
Posts: 2,682
Thanks: 5
Thanked 63 Times in 63 Posts
Rep Power: 5
 
Re: Ranger 33 or Ericson 35-2 for Offshore?

Quote:
Originally Posted by souljour2000 View Post
Have sailed on neither but I'd go with Ericson 35 II given a choice...comparing the numbers of the boats..the Ericson is heavier, beamier, likley more stable and stiffer...will likely carry a bit more in terms of supplies...also likely the drier boat of the two ...but not having been on either...this isn't a qualified opinion naturally...On paper ...offshore, I'd wanna be on the Ericson...
I ran the two boats on the comparison calculator here :

Sail Calculator Pro v3.53 - 2500+ boats

They are surprisingly similar (identical even) on all counts except displacement to length, which is lower on the Ranger.

Bristol 31.1, San Francisco Bay
MarkSF is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
Reply

Tags
35-2 , ericson , offshore , ranger 33

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

By choosing to post the reply above you agree to the rules you agreed to when joining Sailnet.
Click Here to view those rules.

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the SailNet Community forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
Please note: After entering 3 characters a list of Usernames already in use will appear and the list will disappear once a valid Username is entered.


User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ranger 24? redstripesailor Boat Review and Purchase Forum 20 01-27-2014 05:42 PM
ericson 27 v. pearson 27 v. ranger 26 SeaMck333 Boat Review and Purchase Forum 10 12-13-2011 11:02 AM
Offshore performance of a Beneteau Oceanis 500 offshore JohnVerver Introduce Yourself 1 05-23-2009 12:40 PM
Is the Ranger 28 really a Ranger 29 or vice versa? GBurton Boat Review and Purchase Forum 3 04-28-2008 01:38 AM
Ranger 33 to an Ericson 34? Queequeg Boat Review and Purchase Forum 4 09-22-2003 10:36 AM

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome