Early IOR quirks - SailNet Community

   Search Sailnet:

 forums  store  


Quick Menu
Forums           
Articles          
Galleries        
Boat Reviews  
Classifieds     
Search SailNet 
Boat Search (new)

Shop the
SailNet Store
Anchor Locker
Boatbuilding & Repair
Charts
Clothing
Electrical
Electronics
Engine
Hatches and Portlights
Interior And Galley
Maintenance
Marine Electronics
Navigation
Other Items
Plumbing and Pumps
Rigging
Safety
Sailing Hardware
Trailer & Watersports
Clearance Items

Advertise Here






Go Back   SailNet Community > On Board > Boat Review and Purchase Forum
 Not a Member? 


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 03-12-2004
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 39
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 0
owenmccall is on a distinguished road
Early IOR quirks

Jeff_H wrote: "They (Morgan 27s) were designed around the earliest IOR rule and have some of the quirkiness of early IOR boats."

Jeff, could you elaborate on this point? Am interested since I am considering the purchase of an early IOR boat. Thanks. (Others'' opinions welcome as well!)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message Share with Facebook
  #2  
Old 03-12-2004
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: New England USA
Posts: 261
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Rep Power: 12
Silmaril is on a distinguished road
Early IOR quirks

The "IOR" syndrome, is a reflection on the design results of trying to get the best performance under the racing rules of the day.

The end results were boats that had smallish mains, what were called "High Aspect" mainsails, and gigantic (in proportion) foretriangles.

Hull forms favored by the IOR rules had "Pinched" ends, especially the transom. The major flaw in the designs were a propensity to broaching. The boats would begin to heel, the rudder would become uncovered, the helm would lose bite and "Viola" a broach. This was most evident running, with the giant ''chutes up and a following sea. A helmsman needed eyes in the back of his head to watch the waves both in front and behind.

These designs also favored big muscular crew, to handle the enormous headsails, and the constant "gear changes" necessitated by driving a boat with the genoa and not the main.

Some designs were worse than others, and some even worked well, given the rules.

You can take one of these older designs and tame it, yet it will usually always be a compromise. Change the 170 - 165% genoa for a 130% and put a main on that has a larger roach. You will go slower, and not be as well balanced, but it will be less work. Also keep the spinniker in its bag on windy days with a following sea.

IMHO I always liked the look of the boats from that era, that''s why I have a ''76 One Tonner. But I also chose mine knowing the ones that worked, vs. the ones that didn''t. And I also respect the challenge that sailing her entails.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message Share with Facebook
  #3  
Old 03-15-2004
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 39
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 0
owenmccall is on a distinguished road
Early IOR quirks

But small mainsails do not seem to be a characteristic of early IOR boats, but rather that of the later designs, along with internal ballast and those wide flat aft sections that cause the rudder to lift out of the water upon heeling downwind. I don''t see any of those characteristics on the early IORs. I am asking about the quirks of the early IOR boats, those just after the CCA rule. Thanks.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message Share with Facebook
  #4  
Old 03-15-2004
Jeff_H's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Annapolis, Md
Posts: 6,665
Thanks: 5
Thanked 103 Times in 79 Posts
Rep Power: 10
Jeff_H has a spectacular aura about Jeff_H has a spectacular aura about Jeff_H has a spectacular aura about
Early IOR quirks

When you ask about early IOR boat quirks, the small mainsail and large headsail sail plan shows up at the end of the CCA era and gets extreme by the earliest IOR boats, (look at a Tartan 41, Northstar 500, Ranger 37, Morgan 27 or Morgan One Tonner). The pinched ends and tumble home topsides show up very early as well and these lead to the wild rolling downwind rides that made these early IOR boats known thier "hold onto your hats she''s going again" broaches and round ups. The full topsides and pinched bow sections meant that as they heel, these early IOR boats tend to go bow down and aerate their rudders. IOR boats tended to be underballasted right from day one and to have comparatively high vertical centers of gravity. While some like the Tartan 41 remain as pretty reasonable boats most are pretty useless as race boats or cruisers.

Jeff
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message Share with Facebook
  #5  
Old 03-16-2004
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 39
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 0
owenmccall is on a distinguished road
Early IOR quirks

I checked out those designs you listed, Jeff, and I see what you mean. I was wrongly assuming that some less extreme versions of the IOR type-form equated with "early IOR". I mean things like a Contessa 32, Yankee 30 (Mks. I & II, not III), and Tartan 30. These would be less extreme IOR or more cruising influenced, or what, would you say? They really have a somewhat different look than those you listed, yet are of the IOR type, correct?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message Share with Facebook
  #6  
Old 03-16-2004
Jeff_H's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Annapolis, Md
Posts: 6,665
Thanks: 5
Thanked 103 Times in 79 Posts
Rep Power: 10
Jeff_H has a spectacular aura about Jeff_H has a spectacular aura about Jeff_H has a spectacular aura about
Early IOR quirks

The Contessa 32 is an RORC design(Royal Offshore Racing Conference). The RORC was an earlier racing rule than the IOR. The IOR was developed by a joint international committee as an attempt to merge the RORC with the CCA rules. The Yankee 30 was a very late CCA rule design with minor changes that recognized the likely impact of the IOR rule. That makes sense since Olin Stephens was on the IOR committee and he also designed the Yankee and so knew what was coming. The Tartan 30 was a MORC design which produced much more powerful and well mannered hull forms and rigs.

Jeff
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message Share with Facebook
  #7  
Old 03-16-2004
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 39
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 0
owenmccall is on a distinguished road
Early IOR quirks

Fascinating. And since S&S also designed the Tartan 30 a family resemblance here is not unexpected, I guess. Which brings us back to the original question that I meant to ask: Do these boats we have just named possess all of the bad habits associated with the IOR typeform, or do they have a set all their own? Are they well mannered?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message Share with Facebook
  #8  
Old 03-16-2004
Jeff_H's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Annapolis, Md
Posts: 6,665
Thanks: 5
Thanked 103 Times in 79 Posts
Rep Power: 10
Jeff_H has a spectacular aura about Jeff_H has a spectacular aura about Jeff_H has a spectacular aura about
Early IOR quirks

The Tartan 30 is one of my favorite boats of that era. The were well constructed and sail quite well. While I am not a fan of their rig proportions, they are still well behaved and nice sailing boats. The Contessa 32 has a pretty strong following. Compared to later designs they are pretty slow, cramped and tender but the exchange that for a comfortable motion and pretty high level of seaworthiness. I don''t know the Yankee all that well but from what I gather they did offer similar behavior to the early IOR boats that I mentioned in an earlier post.

Jeff
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message Share with Facebook
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

By choosing to post the reply above you agree to the rules you agreed to when joining Sailnet.
Click Here to view those rules.

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the SailNet Community forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
Please note: After entering 3 characters a list of Usernames already in use will appear and the list will disappear once a valid Username is entered.
User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

 
Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may post attachments
You may edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
High Tech vs traditional-Comments? Pangaea General Discussion (sailing related) 38 08-07-2007 02:07 AM
Maine to Norfolk in early November Cheetie Cruising & Liveaboard Forum 0 08-22-2002 07:22 AM
Never to Early to BAHA blkpearl Crew Wanted/Available 0 05-16-2002 02:35 PM
Looking for Key West Charter early April 2002 bospgmr Cruising & Liveaboard Forum 0 01-03-2002 11:45 AM
Looking for Key West Charter early April 2002 bospgmr General Discussion (sailing related) 0 01-03-2002 11:44 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:35 PM.

Add to My Yahoo!         
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1
(c) Marine.com LLC 2000-2012

The SailNet.com store is owned and operated by a company independent of the SailNet.com forum. You are now leaving the SailNet forum. Click OK to continue or Cancel to return to the SailNet forum.