Morgan 27 - SailNet Community

   Search Sailnet:

 forums  store  


Quick Menu
Forums           
Articles          
Galleries        
Boat Reviews  
Classifieds     
Search SailNet 
Boat Search (new)

Shop the
SailNet Store
Anchor Locker
Boatbuilding & Repair
Charts
Clothing
Electrical
Electronics
Engine
Hatches and Portlights
Interior And Galley
Maintenance
Marine Electronics
Navigation
Other Items
Plumbing and Pumps
Rigging
Safety
Sailing Hardware
Trailer & Watersports
Clearance Items

Advertise Here






Go Back   SailNet Community > On Board > Boat Review and Purchase Forum
 Not a Member? 


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 01-23-2013
minnow1193's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Apollo Beach, Fl
Posts: 206
Thanks: 3
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Rep Power: 3
minnow1193 is on a distinguished road
Morgan 27

Found another possibility. 1973 Morgan 27. Can anyone share pros and cons? Like the looks and would be my first 'big' boat. Compare and contrast to the Pearson 26 i asked about earlier?

http://fortmyers.craigslist.org/chl/boa/3524035070.html

Thanks again

Steve
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
  #2  
Old 01-24-2013
Jeff_H's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Annapolis, Md
Posts: 6,532
Thanks: 5
Thanked 85 Times in 65 Posts
Rep Power: 10
Jeff_H has a spectacular aura about Jeff_H has a spectacular aura about Jeff_H has a spectacular aura about
Re: Morgan 27

I know that there are folks who own and love these boats. Maybe one of them will show up here and make their case. I can only tell what my experience with them has been and my sense about these boats relative to other boats that I have known. I also apologize that this was cut and paste from an earlier post of mine on the Morgan 27.

I raced on these boats back in the late 1970ís/early 1980ís. The Morgan 27 was part of a series of IOR oriented boats that Morgan tooled up in the early 1970ís. They were a mixed bag. First of all they were flawed as cruisers in that the IOR rule beating measures as they were applied in this case produced a boat that was compromised in terms of accommodations, sail plan proportions, seaworthiness and to a lesser extent motion comfort.

As race boats these were hard boats to sail well and in many ways were quickly made obsolete by the mid-1970ís boats coming out of the MORC rule such as the J-24, Capri 25. Kirby 25, Soverel 30, and so on. These MORC derived boats performed well on all points of sail and in a wide range of windspeeds, where as the Morgan 27 only performed well in narrow range of conditions and points of sail. Comparatively speaking the Morgan 27ís were pretty good in moderate conditions going upwind and dead down wind (when there was enough wind to go dead downwind) but did poorly in light air and in heavier conditions, and also did very poorly against the MORC boats on a reach or in conditions where surfing was possible.

In a general sense, these were difficult boats to sail well; they quickly lost speed easily and did not have the acceleration to get it back again quickly. They were a little tender and tended to wipe in a gust. For a 27 footer they needed large sail inventories to be competitive. The one that I raced on most had a mainsail, light #1, AP#1, #2, #3, 90% Blade, Star cut Spinnaker, radial cut spinnaker, and spinnaker staysail. To keep the boat up to speed and manageable we made frequent sail changes. (Todayís better sailcloth and sail cuts may allow you to eliminate the light #1, eliminate the spin. staysail, and maybe only use a single spinnaker).

Build quality wise, these were pretty poorly built boats. The keel to hull joint was quite vulnerable due to the rake of the Ďshark finí type keel, as was the hull on either side of the keel which would flex when the boat was pushed hard upwind in a chop. Similarly the shroud attachment point was quite vulnerable. I sailed on several of these boats and in heavy air the hull would oil can at the shrouds as the shrouds pulled the windward side of the boat inward. You could actually audibly hear the topsides pop back into place when you tacked the boats in a breeze.

As a result of these known conditions, at least in Savannah, where I sailed these boats, there were standard fixes for the problem. At least on the Savannah boats the keel was dropped off and the bilge reinforced and larger transverse frames added. Some of the boats had the trailing edges of their keels extended to improve stability and increase the bearing area of the keel on the hill. Similarly longitudinal and transverse frames were added to the topsides in the area of the shrouds. In some earlier discussions some M-27 owners swore that the factory remedied these problems in some of the later boats. That may be the case, but I personally have never seen one of the factory corrected boats.

If you are looking at one of these boats that has not had the remedial work done on it, and its been sailed hard all of these years, I would be very concerned with fatigue in these critical areas of the boat.

I often say that there is nothing more obsolete than an obsolete race boat. While the Morgan 27 was a much better boat than many of its even more obsolete peers from that era, it none the less, remains not as great a boat as it could or should be if designed absent the racing fads of its day.

Jeff
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Curmudgeon at Large- and rhinestone in the rough, sailing my Farr 11.6 on the Chesapeake Bay and part-time purveyor of marine supplies
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
  #3  
Old 01-24-2013
minnow1193's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Apollo Beach, Fl
Posts: 206
Thanks: 3
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Rep Power: 3
minnow1193 is on a distinguished road
Thank you Jeff. All i need to know.
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
  #4  
Old 01-24-2013
SloopJonB's Avatar
Senior Moment Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: West Vancouver B.C.
Posts: 10,615
Thanks: 56
Thanked 48 Times in 45 Posts
Rep Power: 4
SloopJonB will become famous soon enough
Re: Morgan 27

Lots of discussion of the 27 here.

Morgan 27
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
I, myself, personally intend to continue being outspoken and opinionated, intolerant of all fanatics, fools and ignoramuses, deeply suspicious of all those who have "found the answer" and on my bad days, downright rude.
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

 
Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may post attachments
You may edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Morgan 34 vs Morgan 35 sailpower Boat Review and Purchase Forum 2 05-02-2011 04:51 PM
Morgan 32? Duke 7184 Morgan 1 08-08-2006 02:17 PM
Morgan 32? Duke 7184 Morgan 1 04-14-2006 06:06 PM
What about a Morgan OI? tuco General Discussion (sailing related) 9 01-07-2003 11:51 AM
Morgan 33 (CCA) ricekrgr General Discussion (sailing related) 0 12-19-2002 09:41 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:24 PM.

Add to My Yahoo!         
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1
(c) Marine.com LLC 2000-2012

The SailNet.com store is owned and operated by a company independent of the SailNet.com forum. You are now leaving the SailNet forum. Click OK to continue or Cancel to return to the SailNet forum.