
11-14-2006
|
 |
Anchorsmith
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 249
Rep Power: 6
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by heaaron
I'll take some photos next time I'm at the boat. I'm not opposed to replacing the anchor with one that works better on the stock roller if I can find an anchor that holds as well as the CQR in the Chesapeake mud. I'l study the Sail report, although at first glance, they appear to have tested in the sand. Thanks.
|
The SAIL testing was in sand, and the CQR did badly because it couldn't set, but this is why it is good testing in general. Any anchor can set in soft stuff. The test illustrates the problems with poor anchors, sorts the men from the boys so to speak. The differences in performance are exacerbated, with failures appearing in a harsh light.
Further to that, you won't have much trouble finding an anchor that holds better than a CQR in the Chesapeake. Anything but a Bruce, Fisherman, or bit of rock on a string.
__________________
Craig Smith
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Sailnet Disclosure: Craig is the son of the designer of Rocna and has a financial interest in its success.
|