
03-24-2007
|
 |
Anchorsmith
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 249
Rep Power: 6
|
|
The standard nonsense from Poiraud, and the standard response for those who value independent testing:
Raw data from SAIL:
Code:
Anchor Weight (lbs) Max Before Releasing (holding power)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bulwagga 28 2200
Claw 36 0
CQR 38 2300
Delta 36 3250
Fortress 22* 2100
Hydrobubble 16** 1700
Manson Supreme 35 2400
Océane 38 0
WM Performance 20 26 1600
Rocna 32 4800
SARCA 33 2800
Spade 35 3300
WASI / Bügel 32 2700
XYZ 12.5 900
* aluminium
** partly aluminium
Quotes from SAIL and Yachting Monthly:
"The Spade turned out to be one of the better-performing anchors on 5:1 scope... Results fell off dramatically, however, at 3:1 scope and at the New Brighton location."
"The Rocna was a powerful, impressive performer in our tests, recording instant sets at multiple 5,000 lb maximum (or near max) pulls at 5:1 scope. On the second 5:1 it released suddenly at maximum tension when revs were reduced, only to reset instantly at 4,300 lb of resistance, which was astonishing for an instant set."
"[The Manson] Supreme anchor, launched last year, is similar to the Rocna design. It also copies Sarca’s shank slot... At our first test location it set immediately and held to the maximum 5,000 lb pull... At other locations it wasn’t quite as steadfast, but still set and provided around 2,500 lb of resistance."
Strange how these comments differ to those from Power & Motor Yacht. It might have something to do with their seeming inability to distinguish between holding power while dragging and holding power while, ummn, dragging. Or it might have something to do with the fact that Jeffrey Moser, writer of the P&MY article, wasn't even present at the 2nd round of testing?
__________________
Craig Smith
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Sailnet Disclosure: Craig is the son of the designer of Rocna and has a financial interest in its success.
|