SailNet is a forum community dedicated to Sailing enthusiasts. Come join the discussion about sailing, modifications, classifieds, troubleshooting, repairs, reviews, maintenance, and more!
I am planning to charter a boat in Greece and one paragraph in "Charter agreement" attracted my attention:
Itinerary:
To plan and to carry out the yacht’s itinerary in such a manner as to reach the port of call farthest away from the point at which the yacht must be returned to the owner (Turn-Around Point) within the first one third (1/3) of the charter period and that two days prior to the termination of the charter the yacht’s port of call shall lie at a distance not greater than forty (40) N.M. from the point at which the yacht is to be returned to the owner.
I understand what they are trying to achieve (insure that you don't go too far that you will be late to return), but it will inconvenience us a great deal since we are planning to spend a few days in the marina of origin (to do some sightseeing) and it will leave us almost no time to reach "Turn-Around-Point".
Is that a fair common clause in charter contract or something rather unusual?
You reminded me of my favorite law school professor who would cross out the disclaimers on the back of his airline tickets, knowing that the ticketing clerk would not look or care what he did. He said that something to argue in court is better than than nothing to go in with.
Thanks guys!
I would rather not sleep on board, but it seems almost impossible to charter a boat for anything rather than whole week(s). Adding sight-seeing will extend our trip beyond reasonable. And considering jet-lag, I would rather be sight-seeing jetlaged than sailing. But it is an option. I might try changing timing in the contract as have been suggested and see how it will go.
I am just curious if somebody seen that clause before?
I've not see anything like that before - not that I've chartered extensively. Every charter that I have done, I just had to get the boat back to the marina by a certain time. They left it up to me to figure out how to do that.
You as in the charter policy (may) only cover damage to topsides - i.e. running around and dropping stuff.
Damage below the water line might not be covered at all. I've seen it both ways.
Owner has: "to insure the Yacht and her equipment against fire, marine and collision risks and third party damage and against any and all loss or damage in excess of 2.000€
and the charterer shall therefore be relieved of any and all liability which is covered by the said Policy, provided that such loss or damage is not caused or contributed to
by any act of cross negligence or willful default on his part.
---------------------------------------------------------------
So I guess it depends what constitutes "act of cross negligence or willful default". I am curious how you read it?
Well, I have searched the Net carefully, and it seems that this clause (Point of return reached in 1/3 of the charter period) is indeed a standard one at least in this area of Greece (Saronic Gulf). Every contract form I was able to find on line from charter companies in that region have this clause.
Just want to let people who are planning to charter boat in Greece know that they have to plan accordingly. Not sure how enforceable this clause is in the best case scenario, but it seems to be tided up with the boat insurance. So if you break that clause and something happens with the boat, the boat insurance is void and everything is on your dime. That can be an expensive proposition
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Related Threads
?
?
?
?
?
SailNet Community
1.7M posts
173.8K members
Since 1990
A forum community dedicated to Sailing, boating, cruising, racing & chartering. Come join the discussion about sailing, destinations, maintenance, repairs, navigation, electronics, classifieds and more