Back Creek and Annapolis Zoning - SailNet Community

   Search Sailnet:

 forums  store  


Quick Menu
Forums           
Articles          
Galleries        
Chat  
Boat Reviews  
Classifieds     
Search SailNet 
Boat Search (new)

Shop the
SailNet Store
Anchor Locker
Boatbuilding & Repair
Charts
Clothing
Electrical
Electronics
Engine
Hatches and Portlights
Interior And Galley
Maintenance
Marine Electronics
Navigation
Other Items
Plumbing and Pumps
Rigging
Safety
Sailing Hardware
Trailer & Watersports
Clearance Items

Advertise Here






Go Back   SailNet Community > Out There > Destinations > Chesapeake / Central US east coast > Chesapeake Bay
 Not a Member? 


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 04-24-2011
ardoin's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Annapolis MD
Posts: 140
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 7
ardoin is on a distinguished road
Back Creek and Annapolis Zoning

Just saw a sign at the end of 6th street that says there is an application to prohibit anchoring in Back Creek at the end of 6th St. The hearing is on April 26.
Anyone know what is up? I don't like these kinds of restriction.
If they are having problems with boat there, i would think you could come up with ways to handle it without banning all anchoring.
Shame that they would hold the hearing when most of the people that use that anchorage are in the Bahamas working their way back north.
__________________
Cy
S/V Music
MASON 44

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message Share with Facebook
  #2  
Old 04-24-2011
SVAuspicious's Avatar
Mermaid Hunter
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: on the boat - Chesapeake
Posts: 3,852
Thanks: 0
Thanked 152 Times in 135 Posts
Rep Power: 9
SVAuspicious will become famous soon enough
I'll head over today and read the sign, and try to attend on Tuesday. In the meantime I'll do some research and see what I can find.
__________________
sail fast and eat well, dave
S/V Auspicious
AuspiciousWorks.com
beware "cut and paste" sailors.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message Share with Facebook
  #3  
Old 04-24-2011
JohnRPollard's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Chesapeake
Posts: 5,680
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Rep Power: 10
JohnRPollard is a jewel in the rough JohnRPollard is a jewel in the rough JohnRPollard is a jewel in the rough
Quote:
Originally Posted by SVAuspicious View Post
I'll head over today and read the sign, and try to attend on Tuesday. In the meantime I'll do some research and see what I can find.
Thanks for the heads up, ardoin, and thanks auspicious for checking into it further. More info would be helpful.

We anchor there occasionally when Spa Creek is too busy -- there is a nice bulkhead/ladder for going ashore and walking in to town across Eastport. I'd be sorry to lose this spot as an option.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Pacific Seacraft Crealock 31 #62

NEVER CALLS CRUISINGDAD BACK....CAN"T TAKE THE ACCENT
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message Share with Facebook
  #4  
Old 04-24-2011
cruising all I can
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 994
Thanks: 3
Thanked 24 Times in 19 Posts
Rep Power: 8
joethecobbler is on a distinguished road
Sad, But I'm not suprised. If you search other posts and topics the anchoring and holding in the back creek has been discussed .
I am opposed to ANY anchoring restricto anywhere outside a navigable channel.
Unfortunately many w/ influence do not share my view'son anchoring.
This despite centuries of anchoring and countless maritime laws, the slow and steady erosion of anchoring rights continue to move onward.
Often justified by false sentiment scare tactics and often supported by people whith best interests as well as hidden agendas, and alterior motives.
The end result will undoubtedly be yet more needless regulation and loss of one more enjoyment of sailing/cruising.
Another sad moment forthcoming.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message Share with Facebook
  #5  
Old 04-24-2011
cruising all I can
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 994
Thanks: 3
Thanked 24 Times in 19 Posts
Rep Power: 8
joethecobbler is on a distinguished road
In regards to spa creek, a few more mooring balls and the 75' rule and their will effectively be no anchoring there either.
I'm glad I took the opportunity in 2010 to spend a few days in Annapolis anchored as it sounds like I won't have that option again.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message Share with Facebook
  #6  
Old 04-25-2011
SVAuspicious's Avatar
Mermaid Hunter
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: on the boat - Chesapeake
Posts: 3,852
Thanks: 0
Thanked 152 Times in 135 Posts
Rep Power: 9
SVAuspicious will become famous soon enough
Here is the notice of hearing.



Apologies for the photo orientation. Busy day.

I have spoken to staff at the board of port wardens and to Flip Walters, Annapolis Harbormaster. I also spoke with Alderman Arnett and to the chair of the Maritime Advisory Board.

Many thanks to 'Frank' at the Dept of Neighborhood and Environmental Programs Office for his time in filling in the background. Also thanks to Dick Franyo at the Boatyard Bar and Grill for helping with phone numbers for Mr. Arnett and Mr. Lomax.

Mears Marina made an application for the no anchoring zone. Watergate Village Marine is supporting the application. The issue is the substantial number of boats that drag down on those two marinas in particular who anchor in the wide spot between Port A and Watergate. I can testify to the fact that there is a lot of dragging. I keep my boat at Watergate and last year alone was out at least three times to tow boats off the pilings at Watergate. I've seen boats drag down to Mears and up into the cove also. I understand the issue from the perspective of the marinas.

The Harbormaster has the authority to establish a no-anchoring zone on his own authority. The City is going out of their way to reach out to the community and sailors by holding a hearing. I'll be there and will report.

I have mixed feelings on the subject. I have had a tough time getting in and out of my marina a number of times due to boats anchored too close (within the existing 75' stand-off requirement). As stated, I have rescued numerous boats that have dragged.

At the same time, one of the characteristics that make Annapolis special is the welcome we provide to visiting boaters. I don't want to lose that. I suspect the downtown businesses don't either. The opportunity to anchor out is part of the charm here.

More as it comes evolves.
__________________
sail fast and eat well, dave
S/V Auspicious
AuspiciousWorks.com
beware "cut and paste" sailors.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Last edited by SVAuspicious; 04-25-2011 at 02:29 PM. Reason: fixed orientation of picture
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message Share with Facebook
  #7  
Old 04-25-2011
Jeff_H's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Annapolis, Md
Posts: 6,761
Thanks: 5
Thanked 119 Times in 94 Posts
Rep Power: 10
Jeff_H has a spectacular aura about Jeff_H has a spectacular aura about Jeff_H has a spectacular aura about
I had heard discussion about this a while back which pretty much confirmed what was said about dragging boats in this narrow area where there is such poor holding and the need to do something. It is my understanding that the long term goal is that the City might install screw type moorings in this area.

Jeff
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Curmudgeon at Large- and rhinestone in the rough, sailing my Farr 11.6 on the Chesapeake Bay
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message Share with Facebook
  #8  
Old 04-25-2011
SVAuspicious's Avatar
Mermaid Hunter
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: on the boat - Chesapeake
Posts: 3,852
Thanks: 0
Thanked 152 Times in 135 Posts
Rep Power: 9
SVAuspicious will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeff_H View Post
... in this narrow area where there is such poor holding ...
Not true. The holding is fine. I've anchored there often both before I had a slip on Back Creek and when I offer my slip to friends in town for a bit. The problem is that people don't know how to anchor effectively. My opinion may not be PC, but it is mine. *grin* I've been out to grab dragging boats a number of times and successfully gotten them anchored and holding in subsequent blows.

The problem is that if you drag at all you will run into something or someone as there is not a lot of room.

Additional moorings have been suggested but are not high on the priority list.
__________________
sail fast and eat well, dave
S/V Auspicious
AuspiciousWorks.com
beware "cut and paste" sailors.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message Share with Facebook
  #9  
Old 04-25-2011
JohnRPollard's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Chesapeake
Posts: 5,680
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Rep Power: 10
JohnRPollard is a jewel in the rough JohnRPollard is a jewel in the rough JohnRPollard is a jewel in the rough
SVA,

Thanks for that great report. This gives a much better understanding of the issue.

I know exactly the spot they are speaking about. We've anchored there and found the holding to be good. It's very nicely protected too.

But I have a friend who keeps his boat at WGM, and I've also seen some boats in there that were too close. Some that looked like they were long-term "parked" there, too, i.e. unattended.

I can appreciate the concern at WGM and Mears. I would ask only that instead of putting all their effort into prohibiting anchoring, they instead go with a two-prong approach and make such a prohibition contingent on dropping in 2-3 (or ??) transient moorings. That is an eminently reasonable compromise, and will meet less resistance.

It really is an ideal location for absorbing some of the overflow from Spa Creek on the really busy holiday weekends. The access to Eastport is very handy. I think folks would be very happy to pay a mooring fee (maybe the lower amount that is charged above the bridge on Spa Creek) for the security and convenience. I know we would.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Pacific Seacraft Crealock 31 #62

NEVER CALLS CRUISINGDAD BACK....CAN"T TAKE THE ACCENT
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message Share with Facebook
  #10  
Old 04-25-2011
SVAuspicious's Avatar
Mermaid Hunter
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: on the boat - Chesapeake
Posts: 3,852
Thanks: 0
Thanked 152 Times in 135 Posts
Rep Power: 9
SVAuspicious will become famous soon enough
I personally think part of the answer is better enforcement of the existing 75 foot rule. Some means of following up on the liability for damage from dragging boats is interesting also.
__________________
sail fast and eat well, dave
S/V Auspicious
AuspiciousWorks.com
beware "cut and paste" sailors.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message Share with Facebook
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

By choosing to post the reply above you agree to the rules you agreed to when joining Sailnet.
Click Here to view those rules.

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the SailNet Community forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
Please note: After entering 3 characters a list of Usernames already in use will appear and the list will disappear once a valid Username is entered.
User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

 
Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may post attachments
You may edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Haulout (then right back in) in Annapolis Quickstep192 Gear & Maintenance 9 08-28-2011 10:41 PM
Annapolis to Deltaville and back rockDAWG Chesapeake Bay 29 09-14-2010 02:18 PM
NYC from Rock Creek and back chef2sail Chesapeake Bay 4 07-18-2008 12:50 AM
Sailing: Wild Oats clinches back-to-back victories (New Straits Times) NewsReader News Feeds 0 12-28-2006 09:15 PM
Boaz sails to back-to-back titles (Sand Mountain Reporter) NewsReader News Feeds 0 04-28-2006 11:15 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:53 AM.

Add to My Yahoo!         
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1
(c) Marine.com LLC 2000-2012

The SailNet.com store is owned and operated by a company independent of the SailNet.com forum. You are now leaving the SailNet forum. Click OK to continue or Cancel to return to the SailNet forum.