multi hulls -vs- mono huls? - SailNet Community

   Search Sailnet:

 forums  store  

Quick Menu
Boat Reviews  
Search SailNet 
Boat Search (new)

Shop the
SailNet Store
Anchor Locker
Boatbuilding & Repair
Hatches and Portlights
Interior And Galley
Marine Electronics
Other Items
Plumbing and Pumps
Sailing Hardware
Trailer & Watersports
Clearance Items

Advertise Here

Go Back   SailNet Community > Out There > Cruising & Liveaboard Forum
 Not a Member? 

LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 10-12-2001
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 9
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 0
DavidVaughn is on a distinguished road
multi hulls -vs- mono huls?

I have been looking into the Prout "Quest 31" and "Event 34". On the other hand the Island Packet "320" as a mono hull offers a lot to the standards I am looking for also. Yes I know they are older boats but I could save that money to upgrade systems. The thing is there has been great dilemma (on my part) as what you may have to offer as pros and cons to the choices. Any input would be greatly appreciated.
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
Old 10-15-2001
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 5
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 0
knome is on a distinguished road
multi hulls -vs- mono huls?

Wow. That''s a real can of worms you''ve opened up, David. The MonoHull vs. Multihull debate (from what I can see) rages on but for what it is worth here are some things I think you should consider:

- The Island Packet is a venerable design and has many adherents. Take a look around for other Island Packet owners and you''ll find their virtues being extolled.

- The Prout Quest 31 has less Beam then I would like on a Multihull for offshore voyaging (28ft LWL / 14ft Beam), preferring a <1.5 Length/Beam ratio for better stability.

- The Prout Event 34 is a more recent model, and seems better fitted, but still the length to beam ratio seems less suited for offshore voyaging (33ft LWL / 15ft Beam).

If you are going to be coastal cruising, then the Prouts mentioned would be fine vessels, but no matter what you intend to do, The Islander will serve you.

So, if you want to do blue water cruising, I would have to say, given these three choices, to choose the Island Packet as the safest alternative.

I, however, like Multihulls much better than Monohulls when configured right for the job intended, so if you can locate a Catamaran with a <1.5 Length to Beam ratio, or a Trimaran in a similiar configuration, and built by a good builder, you would be good to go over almost any ocean. If you need to stay under a certain budget consideration, check out for multihulls for sale.

This link: to a very detailed examination of multihull seaworthiness, if you have concerns about that as well.

Ultimately, the choice is up to you. Your experience and enjoyment are the most important factors (after safety) in choosing the right boat, either monohull or multihull.

Happy Cruising!
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may post attachments
You may edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ST60 Multi NMEA Interface dave8976 Gear & Maintenance 20 07-23-2010 04:14 PM
Multi vs Mono Mr Jeepers Boat Review and Purchase Forum 39 11-08-2007 08:08 AM
Cat -vs- Mono ? jsgsail Boat Review and Purchase Forum 9 08-02-2004 07:54 AM
Hobie Hulls oldcat Gear & Maintenance 2 04-01-2004 03:53 PM
Professional Skipper (Avail) Mono or Multi or Deliveries: piclarke Crew Wanted/Available 0 05-04-2002 06:17 PM

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:51 AM.

Add to My Yahoo!         
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1
(c) LLC 2000-2012

The store is owned and operated by a company independent of the forum. You are now leaving the SailNet forum. Click OK to continue or Cancel to return to the SailNet forum.