Cruising on a C&C 39 - SailNet Community
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 22 Old 09-05-2007 Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 3
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 0
 
Cruising on a C&C 39

Hello,

We just became the owners of a 1974 C&C 39. I am located just off Vancouver Island and I purchased the boat in the hope of going off-shore with my family - wife and two children - in about a year's time. The plan is to sail down the coast and spend the winters sailing and then leaving her on the hard for the summer months while we return up here. The first season would be in the Sea of Cortez and the west coast of Mexico, the second along the coast of Central America, through the canal, etc, etc.

Having said that I am wondering about the appropriateness of the boat for this. A review postedon the C&C owner's website on the 39 says that it is quite suitable for extended off shore cruising. However, I have a broker here who is telling me that the boat was not intended for off-shore cruising and that I would be wasting money upgrading her for the task, and encouraging me to sell the boat and look for something more appropriate. Having just bought her, I would take a hit if I were to sell her.

Thoughts/advice?

Kind Regards,
JPW
C&C 39
hubans is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 22 Old 09-05-2007
Telstar 28
 
sailingdog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: New England
Posts: 43,290
Thanks: 0
Thanked 14 Times in 12 Posts
Rep Power: 14
         
While she isn't a bluewater built boat, she can be used for open ocean passages and I'm pretty sure ocean crossings have been made in C&C boats that size. I know at least two sailors who have made Atlantic crossings and said they would do so again in a C&C... it was a C&C 38, not the Landfall 39.

She would need some work to be more properly suited for longer, extended offshore voyages IMHO... more tankage, more stowage, better handholds are probably going to be part of the modifications you'll need to make.

Sailingdog

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Telstar 28
New England

You know what the first rule of sailing is? ...Love. You can learn all the math in the 'verse, but you take
a boat to the sea you don't love, she'll shake you off just as sure as the turning of the worlds. Love keeps
her going when she oughta fall down, tells you she's hurting 'fore she keens. Makes her a home.

—Cpt. Mal Reynolds, Serenity (edited)

If you're new to the Sailnet Forums... please read this
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
.

Still—DON'T READ THAT POST AGAIN.
sailingdog is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #3 of 22 Old 09-05-2007
moderate?
 
camaraderie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: East Coast
Posts: 13,877
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Rep Power: 16
     
You don't say if it is a Landfall, so I will assume it is the aft cockpit C&C 39 which is NOT a good bluewater boat for a number of reasons:
hull design for speed, not comfort at sea
fully cored hull
spade rudder
inadequate tankage

If you and a couple of buddies were experienced sailors looking to go down the coast in good weather season and were fully equipped with Epirb, raft etc, I'd be more inclined to say "go for it" for these are well made boats. But you sound relatively inexperienced and I never favor putting children at risk. Your coastal waters can be quite treacherous with long stretches with no safe harbor in bad weather. Once you get down to California...all of your other plans sound quite reasonable assuming you upgrade stuff like tankage for full time cruising. My suggestion would be to hire a catain/crew to make the voyage with you to California (or truck it there) and set out on your plans with the family from there.
Frankly, purchasing a boat like a C&C39 with those cruising plans in mind was probably a mistake, but with a little prudence I think you can do most of what you plan.
camaraderie is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #4 of 22 Old 09-05-2007
Telstar 28
 
sailingdog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: New England
Posts: 43,290
Thanks: 0
Thanked 14 Times in 12 Posts
Rep Power: 14
         
Good point... I forgot they made a C&C 39 as well as the 39 Landfall. Which model of C&C is it??

Sailingdog

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Telstar 28
New England

You know what the first rule of sailing is? ...Love. You can learn all the math in the 'verse, but you take
a boat to the sea you don't love, she'll shake you off just as sure as the turning of the worlds. Love keeps
her going when she oughta fall down, tells you she's hurting 'fore she keens. Makes her a home.

—Cpt. Mal Reynolds, Serenity (edited)

If you're new to the Sailnet Forums... please read this
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
.

Still—DON'T READ THAT POST AGAIN.
sailingdog is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #5 of 22 Old 09-05-2007
Special Delivery
 
speciald's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: live on boat
Posts: 661
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 9
 
Send a message via Skype™ to speciald
I had a 1990 C7C 37+ (39'6") for 10 years. Made multiple coastal cruises. The boat was more a racer than a cruiser with a flat forefoot that tended to pound through waves. With the narrow keel it was squirley in rough water and did not hold course very well. It also tended to carry alot of weather helm as well. If your hull and keel are similar it would not be a comfortable boat off-shore and could be tiring ride for the crew. Typically a boat with a longer keel and a deeper forefoot will give you a more forgiving and steady offshore ride
speciald is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #6 of 22 Old 09-05-2007
Bristol 45.5 - AiniA
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 3,788
Thanks: 5
Thanked 94 Times in 82 Posts
Rep Power: 10
 
I crewed on a 39 from the 70s and it seemed ok for the time but had problems downwind when it was really blowing - would broach, but we were pushing it of course. It is not ideal for extended cruising but people have sailed very long distances in much worse boats.

I think you need to look carefully at everything on the boat, but this is true of any boat of that vintage. Likely a lot of stuff will need modernizing if it has not been done before now. I assume that the hull and deck coring were carefully checked before your purchase. Be very careful about drilling holes through either now. I agree that tankage is likely pretty small.

Good luck with your new boat.
killarney_sailor is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #7 of 22 Old 09-05-2007 Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 3
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 0
 
Thanks for the responses. The boat is not a 'Landfall', but a 'C&C 39' from 1974. I purchased the boat based on the broker (who of course you should only listen to with a grain of salt, but also based on the Perry review ( sailingmagazine.net/perry_cc39.html ) and a review from Sail magazine, that referenced a couple who had done a circumnavigation ( cncphotoalbum.com/reviews/review39.htm ).

I know of a family who circled the globe twice on their 1980's Beneteau First 38. This boat also has a fin keel and a spade rudder. Is there difference (other than roominess) between this and a C&C 39?

Thanks again.
hubans is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #8 of 22 Old 09-05-2007
Telstar 28
 
sailingdog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: New England
Posts: 43,290
Thanks: 0
Thanked 14 Times in 12 Posts
Rep Power: 14
         
I don't think the cored hull is really a big issue on whether the boat is capable of doing ocean passages. Many of the Southern Cross boats have made circumnavigations and ocean crossings, and they have cored hulls.

I don't think the spade rudder is a deal killer on ocean passages. Many boats have made ocean passages with spade rudders. Ellen McArthur's record setting circumnavigation in a trimaran was done using a spade rudder.

The tankage can be modified.

The main obstacle is the boat's motion and shape. That is really a personal issue IMHO... some people get seasick in the slow rolling motion of a traditional full-keel narrow bluewater boat, others get seasick with the very quick, fast motion of a multihull... your boat will be somewhere in between the two.

I've sailed on the C&C 38, and like the boat a lot. I haven't sailed on the 39.

Sailingdog

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Telstar 28
New England

You know what the first rule of sailing is? ...Love. You can learn all the math in the 'verse, but you take
a boat to the sea you don't love, she'll shake you off just as sure as the turning of the worlds. Love keeps
her going when she oughta fall down, tells you she's hurting 'fore she keens. Makes her a home.

—Cpt. Mal Reynolds, Serenity (edited)

If you're new to the Sailnet Forums... please read this
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
.

Still—DON'T READ THAT POST AGAIN.
sailingdog is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #9 of 22 Old 09-05-2007
moderate?
 
camaraderie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: East Coast
Posts: 13,877
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Rep Power: 16
     
The answer Hubans is that there is not much difference...( except that the Beneteau does not have a fully cored hull and is easier to repair and an IOR racing hull is even less comfortable at sea)...and that neither boat is a good bluewater family cruiser. Catalina 27's have gone around the world. That does not make them bluewater boats. Read the bluewater boat threads here for more on that issue.
My point was that your boat will be NOT SEAKINDLY...which means tough to control in bad weather and it will pound your kidneys out in going to windward in even normal offshore weather. My further point was that you personally do not have the experience to safely take your family down the Washington and Oregon coast safely. Combining a boat that is not easy at sea with a captain and crew that are inexperienced and throw kids into the mix and you have a recipe for big problems.
You can comfortably coastal cruise in California and down to Baja and off Mexico and into the Caribe in relative safety in your boat even though there are still issues with tankage and rougher weather will be no fun. At least down there you have the option to pull in somewhere and wait out the bad weather. Just don't end the trip early by going down the NW coast by yourself.

My words are harsh to try to help you understand what a bad idea this is and to protect your kids which I am sure is foremost in your mind as well...so apologies in advance for my bluntness.
The C&C is a beautiful, well made racer cruiser that is well suited to your home cruising grounds...but if you told your broker your long term plans he should be shot!
camaraderie is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #10 of 22 Old 09-06-2007
STARBOARD!!
 
KeelHaulin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,662
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Rep Power: 11
   
Personally I think experience is a bigger factor than the performance characteristics of his C&C 39. It's a capable offshore boat (likely built like a tank weighing ~8 tons). North coast sailing is nasty in the winter and can be bad during the summer also. The trip down from the north is much easier than beating into a NW wind (but I agree that a delivery captain to So Cal without family aboard would be a wise decision). Personally I would sail around Vancouver for a few years gaining experience in everything I could learn about the boat and storm conditions before going offshore. Take your time, refit the boat before you leave and learn, learn, learn, read, read, read. Take some ASA classes and learn celestial nav. Get some competent crew and someone with lots of offshore experience to crew and help skipper for your trip down from BC to San Diego in the late summer of 2011; and then join up to do the Baja-Ha-Ha.

JMHO...
KeelHaulin is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the SailNet Community forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
Please note: After entering 3 characters a list of Usernames already in use will appear and the list will disappear once a valid Username is entered.


User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Retirement Cruising Budgets Randy Harman Cruising Articles 0 05-12-2004 08:00 PM
Calculating the Cost of Cruising Paul & Sheryl Shard Cruising Articles 0 04-03-2003 07:00 PM
Calculating the Cost of Cruising Paul & Sheryl Shard Her Sailnet Articles 0 04-03-2003 07:00 PM

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome