Perkins 4.108M DIY Rebuild -- A Narrative - Page 3 - SailNet Community
 89Likes
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #21 of 268 Old 12-20-2012
Break, curse, fix, repeat
 
bwindrope's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Bainbridge Island, WA
Posts: 267
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Rep Power: 9
 
Re: This Ought to Keep Me Busy...

Great Post and Pics! As daunting as it is, there are few things as satisfying as taking apart an engine and putting back together. It is Promethean!

Aeolus
Gulf 32
Bainbridge Island, WA

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
bwindrope is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #22 of 268 Old 12-22-2012
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Scotland
Posts: 2,364
Thanks: 0
Thanked 11 Times in 11 Posts
Rep Power: 9
 
Re: This Ought to Keep Me Busy...

Did you find the bores worn?
Rockter is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #23 of 268 Old 12-24-2012 Thread Starter
Seņor Member
 
PorFin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,446
Thanks: 8
Thanked 20 Times in 20 Posts
Rep Power: 8
 
Re: This Ought to Keep Me Busy...

Teardown -- The Rest of the Story

OK, so I noticed that I neglected to include the cylinder head in my previous post.

Just to recap, the reason I began this project was to figure out (and hopefully fix) my excessive oil consumption.

After pulling the intake manifold I could see that a lot of the oil was coming out of the top of the engine, through the crankcase breather, and into the intake. The inside of the intake manifold was caked with oil, and you can see the oil accumulation on the face if the intake valves. Not promising...





One of the features of the 4.108 is that the valves have both inner and outer valve springs. That meant that my trusty valve spring compressor just wasn't gonna work. I needed to get a lever arm type, but sticker shock pointed me in another direction. I picked up an 8" c-clamp and a conduit coupler at the closest big box store, and made my own. Total cost -- about $15, plus I've now got a big honkin' c-clamp (one can never have too many clamps, donchaknow.





Anyway, the valves will need to be replaced. The tips (that contact the rocker arms) are pretty well worn. Since the rocker arms have dished out the tops of the tips, getting an accurate valve adjustment is pretty much impossible with a standard feeler gauge. Could I clean them up and reuse them? Sure, but replacements are relatively inexpensive.



The intake valve seats look pretty good -- must have been all that oil keeping them happy.

The exhaust seats are a little pitted, but nothing that lapping won't fix.

The passages were pretty gunked up; the intakes with congealed dirt/oil and the exhaust with carbon build up. Again, solvents, brushes and dental tools were put to use. I got it fairly clean, but I think I'm gonna have the head hot-tanked anyway so further scrubbing would be a waste of time.

BEFORE:


AFTER:


Next Edition: The Measurements (for real this time...)
PorFin is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #24 of 268 Old 12-24-2012 Thread Starter
Seņor Member
 
PorFin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,446
Thanks: 8
Thanked 20 Times in 20 Posts
Rep Power: 8
 
Re: This Ought to Keep Me Busy...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rockter View Post
Did you find the bores worn?
Yeah, they're a little worn (but that story's coming up next )
PorFin is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #25 of 268 Old 12-25-2012 Thread Starter
Seņor Member
 
PorFin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,446
Thanks: 8
Thanked 20 Times in 20 Posts
Rep Power: 8
 
Re: This Ought to Keep Me Busy...

Hey, quick poll for those interested in this thread:

Would you prefer that I keep doing this in installments or would you rather that I wait and do the whole thing once after the project's done?
PorFin is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #26 of 268 Old 12-25-2012
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: N. VA
Posts: 656
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Rep Power: 8
 
Send a message via Yahoo to dacap06
Re: This Ought to Keep Me Busy...

I, for one, prefer installments.

Thanks for asking.
davidpm and SloopJonB like this.

T. P. Donnelly
S/V Tranquility Base
1984 Islander 30 Bahama
Pasadena, MD
dacap06 is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #27 of 268 Old 12-25-2012
Senior Member
 
bljones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: South Coast Ontario
Posts: 8,480
Thanks: 35
Thanked 91 Times in 81 Posts
Rep Power: 8
   
Re: This Ought to Keep Me Busy...

the installments are like an advent calendar for gearheads. keep em coming.

It's 5 o'clock somewhere:


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
bljones is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #28 of 268 Old 12-26-2012
Irrationally Exuberant
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 1,333
Thanks: 9
Thanked 6 Times in 6 Posts
Rep Power: 9
 
Re: This Ought to Keep Me Busy...

+ 1 for installments. I look forward to these! Appreciate the effort.

Tom K

2000 Beneteau 331
Northern Chesapeake Bay

Ambition is a poor excuse for not having enough sense to be lazy ~ Steven Wright
arf145 is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #29 of 268 Old 12-26-2012
Last Man Standing
 
smackdaddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 14,574
Thanks: 153
Thanked 149 Times in 142 Posts
Rep Power: 10
     
Re: This Ought to Keep Me Busy...

Installments.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

S/V Dawn Treader - 1989 Hunter Legend 40
smackdaddy is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #30 of 268 Old 12-26-2012 Thread Starter
Seņor Member
 
PorFin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,446
Thanks: 8
Thanked 20 Times in 20 Posts
Rep Power: 8
 
Re: This Ought to Keep Me Busy...

OK, looks like we're going on the installment plan...

___________________________________________

Today's Chapter: The Measurements

So now that the engine is reduced to its many component parts, the task is to measure things to see how much wear we've got to deal with.

Starting with the data from the service manual, it's simply a matter of checking to see whether or not the parts are within acceptable ranges.

I decided to make my own series of worksheets to record the results, cutting and pasting diagrams and spec data from the service manual into an Excel worksheet. One of the quirks with the Perkins service manual is that relevant data for a particular part of the engine is located in different parts of the book; there's the nominal tech data tables, the acceptable wear limits table, the "how to" paragraphs/diagrams on what to do, etc, etc. It got a little frustrating getting referred to another part of the book (as in "...clearance should be within the range listed in table B.2"), necessitating going back to the front of the book. Better yet, it's a little more organized that a loose leafed binder and I wouldn't be tempted to make notes in the margin of the manual.

Here's an example (this one's for the crankshaft):



Two main areas needed particular attention:

o Since I was getting oil through the top end, I had to try and find out why.
o Ordering the proper sized bearings is critical -- if any previous owner had the crankshaft reground, then undersized bearings would be needed for both the main bearings and the big end bearings.

I started by making sure that the edge of my steel ruler was in fact dead flat; taking measurements where we're talking about accuracy in the 1/1,000" range it's worth the extra effort. I've got a big piece of float glass that I use with silicon carbide sandpaper to sharpen my wood chisels and plane irons -- I just flipped it over and did the same kind of thing for the steel ruler from a combination square.



My initial fear was that the cylinder head was warped. On many engines, any excessive warp can be fixed by having the head milled back flat (or "skimmed" in British parlance) -- for the Perkins, that's not supposed to be done. There is a margin of allowable error, 0.003" side to side and 0.006" front to rear.

I measured lengthwise, widthwise, diagonals, pretty much every way you could think of -- it's not dead flat, but there are no gaps anywhere larger than 0.002". Good news.



While I had the head on the bench, I double checked the other nominal data like for the combustion chamber inserts and their recesses. I intend to replace the valve guides anyway, so I ignored them.

The next piece on the table was the crankshaft. Same game, same results. No scoring or scratches, and the bearings show normal wear. The journals are all within a thou or two of nominal, so the shaft hasn't been machined, and standard sized bearings are what I'll need to order. I'll have the shaft polished just before I start reassembling the engine.





So far, the likely culprit for the leak remains undetected.

The cylinder block's up next.

Several things to check: cylinder bore liner insert wear, camshaft clearance and tappet lift, and liner clearance above the block deck.

Before I started checking bore wear, I spun a hone in each cylinder to highlight any major wear areas.



As you can see, as was expected the top two compression rings have carved out a couple of spots at the top of each cylinder. This is normal.



Using a bore gauge, I measured wear at multiple points in each cylinder.



Long story short, the nominal bore for each cylinder is 3.125"-3.126"; and acceptable wear is 0.006". With the exception of compression ring grooves, wear was well within the acceptable range (about 0.001" front to back; about 0.002" side to side.) The grooves, on the other hand, are a different story. Although they too fall within the acceptable range, they're only about 0.0015" from hitting the limit. Since I'd have to hone the bores down to the lowest (or widest) diameter, that would mean that the entire bore would be a little over a thou from being due for replacement. This is a no-brainer -- the engine's apart, so it just makes sense to replace the liners.

Measuring cam lift is a simple matter of setting up and using a dial indicator. I also double checked the measurements of the bearing journals of the shaft itself. As with the crankshaft, almost no wear was found.



The 4.108 uses dry fit cylinder liners (the 4.99 and 4.107 use wet liners). The inserts are supposed to protrude above the deck of the block to get a good steel-to-steel interface with the cylinder head while leaving room for the head gasket. The nominal protrusion range is 0.023" - 0.027". What I found was that the liner protrusion wasn't equal for each cylinder. #1 was 0.026", #2 was 0.029, #3 was 0.027" and #4 was 0.031". I think we may have identified a potential suspect...



And that, my friends, means that I'll be buying a "major overhaul kit" instead of just a "top end overhaul kit." The top end kit comes with valves, guides, and the rest of the stuff to just do the valve train; the major overhaul kit tacks on pistons and rings, liners, wrist pins, connecting rod bearings, and top and bottom gasket kits.

Next Up: The Water Pump
PorFin is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
Reply

Tags
diesel , diy , engine , perkins , rebuild

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

By choosing to post the reply above you agree to the rules you agreed to when joining Sailnet.
Click Here to view those rules.

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the SailNet Community forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
Please note: After entering 3 characters a list of Usernames already in use will appear and the list will disappear once a valid Username is entered.


User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Perkins 4-108M Switch details pbanderson Introduce Yourself 4 04-05-2013 03:03 PM
Perkins 4108 Rebuild Ilenart Diesel 4 02-13-2010 11:32 PM
rebuild perkins 4-108 gavinandrebecca Gear & Maintenance 12 12-14-2007 11:41 AM
Perkins 4-108M 50HP overheating. CharlieCobra Gear & Maintenance 19 10-12-2007 12:43 PM

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome