
02-26-2012
|
|
Beneteau 411
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 382
Rep Power: 2
|
|
|
I think I've come up with a test method that might allow me to more accurately compare series and parallel modes of operation. At intervals of approximately 30 minutes I switch back and forth between parallel and series. On these occasions, I record the collected Ah (one of the variables output by my controller) and time of reading. I then calculate average Amps during the interval by dividing the Ah accumulated over the interval by time in hours. This method will smooth out the erratic changes in output caused by cloud cover. Hopefully, the effects of cloud coverage and effect of boat orientation on shading will average out between series and parallel over the course of a day to make the comparison meaningful. I have attached a spreadsheet showing the results for an afternoon with heavy shading. The results are calculated in two different ways, but it does show that parallel outperforms series by at least 40% under the conditions encountered.
As an aside, I've discovered that when the wind comes from the prevailing direction just South of East, I get significant shading most of the day on the port side panel from the wind generator and its mast. What makes it particularly nasty is that the shading cuts across all 3 substrings. Despite that, I do not believe that any substring is being bypassed. I base that opinion on the fact that the array Voltage is 50-55 Volts while in series mode (see the attached graph). This suggests that both panels are contributing to the output. I wonder if the loss in solar power is compensated by the output from wind generator? I think not, however, the wind generator does create output on occasions when there is no solar to speak of. Knowing what I know now, I'm not sure if I would have installed the wind generator?
Pete
|