Wireless Depth Finder - Page 2 - SailNet Community

   Search Sailnet:

 forums  store  


Quick Menu
Forums           
Articles          
Galleries        
Boat Reviews  
Classifieds     
Blogs               
Search SailNet 
Boat Search (new)

Shop the
SailNet Store
Anchor Locker
Boatbuilding & Repair
Charts
Clothing
Electrical
Electronics
Engine
Hatches and Portlights
Interior And Galley
Maintenance
Marine Electronics
Navigation
Other Items
Plumbing and Pumps
Rigging
Safety
Sailing Hardware
Trailer & Watersports
Clearance Items









Go Back   SailNet Community > General Interest Forums > Gear & Maintenance > Electronics
 Not a Member? 



Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 09-17-2009
mitiempo's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Victoria B.C. Canada
Posts: 5,226
Rep Power: 4
mitiempo will become famous soon enough
Epoxy is the best way to attach a transducer to the hull. Sealants such as silicone will have an impact on depth sounder performance. Humminbird agrees.
Brian
Attached Images
File Type: jpg t1.jpg (72.7 KB, 47 views)
File Type: jpg t2.jpg (87.2 KB, 45 views)
File Type: jpg t3.jpg (72.9 KB, 45 views)
File Type: jpg t4.jpg (13.6 KB, 45 views)
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 09-18-2009
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: chesapeake bay
Posts: 1,943
Rep Power: 4
scottyt is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by mitiempo View Post
Why did you wax it?
Brian
so if i ever need to pop it loose i can, then i could use a new thin layer to put a new one in the same spot ( assuming same trans ). then i would not have 2, 3, or 4 globs of gel coat under the settee from each new one.
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 09-18-2009
DropTop's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 180
Rep Power: 3
DropTop is on a distinguished road
I've been told by the guys at west marine to avoid the hummingbird brand sounders because the transducers are essentially unique to the model display you have them attached to. If you decide to upgrade at a later date to something with a bigger or color screen or add a chartplotter etc or the unit fails and you need to replace it in a couple of years, you will have to remove the epoxy or whatever you use to secure the transducer to the hull so you can replace it with another model, or leave it there and install another transducer next to it.

Garmin and Raymarine (among others I'm sure) have standard connection transducers that will work with just about any model display you want.

Whatever you choose to do, make sure you are thinking ahead for future upgrades and changes (and possible equipment failures), not just what you need to do today.
__________________
Four Points - 1990 Hunter 27'

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
Sponsored Links
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 09-18-2009
DropTop's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 180
Rep Power: 3
DropTop is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by mitiempo View Post
Epoxy is the best way to attach a transducer to the hull. Sealants such as silicone will have an impact on depth sounder performance. Humminbird agrees.
Brian
I've been told the same thing about silicone under the transducer, I didn't do that.

Between the transducer and the hull is ultrasound gel. It's designed specifically to act as a high grade interface between a sonar transducer and another surface (afterall the sounders, fish finders and bottom plotters we use are just lower grade and lower frequency versions of the same things neonatal doctors use when a women goes in for a pregnancy checkup).

I used 3M 4000 sealant / adhesive only around the outside edge of the transducer to Dam the gel underneath the transducer and prevent it from leaking out, while also holding the transducer in place.

So far it's worked incrediblly well. I have actually seen the box shape of a lobster pot show up on the sonar display when I got a little too close to a bouy once, as well as the line going up to the surface bouy.

It also has the significant benefit of being easily removable should the transducer fail and need replacing for any reason in the future...

We'll see how well it works after sitting for the winter and the gel freezes... Worst case I go to the trusty old epoxy meathod next spring
__________________
Four Points - 1990 Hunter 27'

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 09-18-2009
mitiempo's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Victoria B.C. Canada
Posts: 5,226
Rep Power: 4
mitiempo will become famous soon enough
If you use epoxy and have to remove it just hit it sideways with a hammer - it'll break free without a problem. No liquids tro keep in place by damming area.
Brian
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 09-20-2009
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 126
Rep Power: 3
jetdrvr393 is on a distinguished road
Ok, I'm thinking of going a differetn route now. Today I noticed that my knotmeter is not working either. My boat currently has a Moore knotmeter installed with a thru hull transducer. I have been thinking of upgrading to a Raymarine ST40 bidata system that will do speed, temp and depth. Will their transducers fit in the holes that are already in the hull for the Moore system?
Do you guys think this is a better way to go?

Thanks
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 09-20-2009
mitiempo's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Victoria B.C. Canada
Posts: 5,226
Rep Power: 4
mitiempo will become famous soon enough
Sounds logical in your case as the hole is there and a combined unit makes sense. As far as size, I think you will have to either measure the hole or get the measurement from the owners manual which you may have filed. I couldn't find any info about Moore on the web that is useful. Maybe someone has one, but it's possible there were different sized transducers.
Brian
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 09-20-2009
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 126
Rep Power: 3
jetdrvr393 is on a distinguished road
Ok thanks, if anyone knows if the two sizes match please let me know.

Thanks
Joe
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Depth finder question?? gwp Gear & Maintenance 10 01-12-2009 07:32 PM
Recommendations for Depth finder RookieHunter Gear & Maintenance 17 03-01-2008 08:23 PM
What type depth finder do you have? gwp Gear & Maintenance 11 10-25-2003 12:04 PM
Hints on Depth Finder RookieHunter Gear & Maintenance 1 01-07-2003 10:16 AM
Depth Finder Problems gcall Gear & Maintenance 1 09-06-2001 04:38 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:34 PM.

Add to My Yahoo!         
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0
(c) Sailnet 2000-2006