Radar newbie communication question - SailNet Community

   Search Sailnet:

 forums  store  


Quick Menu
Forums           
Articles          
Galleries        
Boat Reviews  
Classifieds     
Search SailNet 
Boat Search (new)

Shop the
SailNet Store
Anchor Locker
Boatbuilding & Repair
Charts
Clothing
Electrical
Electronics
Engine
Hatches and Portlights
Interior And Galley
Maintenance
Marine Electronics
Navigation
Other Items
Plumbing and Pumps
Rigging
Safety
Sailing Hardware
Trailer & Watersports
Clearance Items

Advertise Here






Go Back   SailNet Community > On Board > Gear & Maintenance > Electronics
 Not a Member? 
  #1  
Old 09-13-2011
S/V Jeanne Marie
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 16
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 0
dtempleton is on a distinguished road
Radar newbie communication question

Getting ready to do some offshore sailing I'm thinking I need at least low end radar. My central nav system is GPS-NavX which I'm pretty happy with, but doesn't integrate directly into a radar, though it can read NMEA 0183 code. I am looking at either a low end Furano system that comes with a monochrome plotter, or getting a compatible plotter used and adding the radome to match.

What I am hung up on is how communication happens between the radome and the plotter. Does the scanner send data through NMEA-0183, and the plotter parses these sentences? Or does the scanner send some other kind of raw data for the plotter to interpret.

One question is whether I can just about any scanner and plotter and expect them to communicate (at least if they are both from the same manufacturer), or is there some non-simple communication going on?

Thanks!

Dennis
__________________
Dennis Templeton
S/V Jeanne Marie --- Morgan 51 cutter, Hull#1
Jackson Creek --- Deltaville, VA
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message Share with Facebook
  #2  
Old 09-13-2011
apogee1mars's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Bakersfield CA.
Posts: 100
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 4
apogee1mars is on a distinguished road
Whenever RADAR is on a vessel it changes the "Who is at fault" situation in case of an unfortunate occurrence. In case this happens have a hammer near to break the array so you can claim the RADAR was not functional at the time of the incident. Liability is covered in Inland Harbor Rules, International Rules, Great Lakes and Western Rivers Rules.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message Share with Facebook
  #3  
Old 09-13-2011
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 713
Thanks: 3
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Rep Power: 10
xymotic is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by apogee1mars View Post
Whenever RADAR is on a vessel it changes the "Who is at fault" situation in case of an unfortunate occurrence. In case this happens have a hammer near to break the array so you can claim the RADAR was not functional at the time of the incident. Liability is covered in Inland Harbor Rules, International Rules, Great Lakes and Western Rivers Rules.
This is NOT TRUE and you are making some major assumptions with this post.

Any and all boats are required to use every aid available to them to avoid a collision. So, if you have radar and you do not use it you well could be found at fault.

HOWEVER, if someone has radar and doesn't use it, they're kind of an idiot anyway IMO


and... sometimes collisions happen even with radar and it is not an automatic liability to have it, in fact if you identify the other boat on radar and try to evade and they still hit you it only strengthens your case legally.

in any case; not buying radar because it increases the odds you will be held accountable for your actions, VS having another tool at your disposal to actually prevent an accident in the first place seems like a silly debate if you ask me.


As to the OP, just make sure you have a radar with MARPA. I'm not 100% sure but I think it just sends the coordinates via NMEA just like AIS does. But I'd suggest firing off an email to the NavX developer. He's very responsive and extremely knowledgeable (and friendly too!)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message Share with Facebook
  #4  
Old 09-14-2011
svHyLyte's Avatar
Old as Dirt!
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Tampa Bay Area
Posts: 2,808
Thanks: 15
Thanked 113 Times in 107 Posts
Rep Power: 6
svHyLyte is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by dtempleton View Post
Getting ready to do some offshore sailing I'm thinking I need at least low end radar. My central nav system is GPS-NavX which I'm pretty happy with, but doesn't integrate directly into a radar, though it can read NMEA 0183 code. I am looking at either a low end Furano system that comes with a monochrome plotter, or getting a compatible plotter used and adding the radome to match.

What I am hung up on is how communication happens between the radome and the plotter. Does the scanner send data through NMEA-0183, and the plotter parses these sentences? Or does the scanner send some other kind of raw data for the plotter to interpret.

One question is whether I can just about any scanner and plotter and expect them to communicate (at least if they are both from the same manufacturer), or is there some non-simple communication going on?

Thanks!

Dennis
Dennis--

I'm not an electronics person so I cannot speak to your communication question particularly well. However, our radar is an older Raytheon R-20x, which of course has a display separate and apart from our Garmin 2006c plotter (at the nav table), and the Garmin has no difficulty passing heading and way-point data to the radar via 0183. If a way-point is within range the radar draws a circle around it (if way-point mode is selected) and when under way, heading data on the radar display is taken from the GPS. Although we cannot "overlay" radar returns on our plotter, when the scales are relatively similar on both displays, I/we do not have difficulty discerning their relationship.

Frankly, I do not like the idea of having all of our Nav data displayed on a single screen as I don't like the idea of having all of our eggs in one basket.

FWIW...
__________________
"It is not so much for its beauty that the sea makes a claim upon men's hearts, as for that subtle something, that quality of air, that emanation from the waves, that so wonderfully renews a weary spirit."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message Share with Facebook
  #5  
Old 09-14-2011
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Norway
Posts: 695
Thanks: 6
Thanked 50 Times in 45 Posts
Rep Power: 9
knuterikt is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by dtempleton View Post
Getting ready to do some offshore sailing I'm thinking I need at least low end radar. My central nav system is GPS-NavX which I'm pretty happy with, but doesn't integrate directly into a radar, though it can read NMEA 0183 code. I am looking at either a low end Furano system that comes with a monochrome plotter, or getting a compatible plotter used and adding the radome to match.

What I am hung up on is how communication happens between the radome and the plotter. Does the scanner send data through NMEA-0183, and the plotter parses these sentences? Or does the scanner send some other kind of raw data for the plotter to interpret.

One question is whether I can just about any scanner and plotter and expect them to communicate (at least if they are both from the same manufacturer), or is there some non-simple communication going on?

Thanks!

Dennis
Neither nmea 0183 nor nmea 2000 can be used to send data from the radar antenna to the display.
For older radars the processing of the signals from the antenna are processed in the display unit.

Newer models have moved the processing into the radar unit, these are designed to be used with MFD's (Multi Function Display). They need a high bandwidt conection between the antenna and the MFD.

The new Furuno sets that are beeing used with the Navnet3D series are using ethernet with a proprietary protocol on top.
The MaxSea PC software (owned by Furuno) can also display the radar picture.

Other new designs use similar solutions.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message Share with Facebook
  #6  
Old 09-14-2011
apogee1mars's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Bakersfield CA.
Posts: 100
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 4
apogee1mars is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by xymotic View Post
This is NOT TRUE and you are making some major assumptions with this post.

It is not an assumption

Any and all boats are required to use every aid available to them to avoid a collision. So, if you have radar and you do not use it you well could be found at fault.

This is true and is the sticking point.

HOWEVER, if someone has radar and doesn't use it, they're kind of an idiot anyway IMO

I am a RADAR advocate. I really like it when all of my electronics interface and I can have automatic collision avoidance, slipped anchor etc.

and... sometimes collisions happen even with radar and it is not an automatic liability to have it, in fact if you identify the other boat on radar and try to evade and they still hit you it only strengthens your case legally.

Not necessarily. Due to the verbiage of the Rules of the road on "The burdened vessel" The vessel positions and who is required to make an international turn to avoid a collision becomes ambiguous. Have an intact RADAR in such a case can further liability per maritime law.

in any case; not buying radar because it increases the odds you will be held accountable for your actions, VS having another tool at your disposal to actually prevent an accident in the first place seems like a silly debate if you ask me.

Never leave home without one is my stance. A couple of EPIRBS with a self departing raft are way up on the list too. I am not advocating NOT buying a RADAR because of potential liability (that would be silly), I am just saying keep a hammer around.



As to the OP, just make sure you have a radar with MARPA. I'm not 100% sure but I think it just sends the coordinates via NMEA just like AIS does. But I'd suggest firing off an email to the NavX developer. He's very responsive and extremely knowledgeable (and friendly too!)
Today's electronics are PFM.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message Share with Facebook
  #7  
Old 09-14-2011
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 713
Thanks: 3
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Rep Power: 10
xymotic is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by apogee1mars View Post
Today's electronics are PFM.
The assumption is that you are assuming it would not be used

Liability is only increased if you also increase your own negligence.

Not only is it just plain bad advice, but the hammer 'trick' would open you up to far more liability, some of which would be criminal such as falsifying reports, lying under oath, interfering with an investigation and if it's the coast guard lying to a federal official.

And not for nothing, but if anyone EVER put together your post(s) advocating such and tied it to you in court,it would not take too clever of an attorney to have you found at fault for just about any collision, radar related or not

Last edited by xymotic; 09-14-2011 at 12:20 PM.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message Share with Facebook
  #8  
Old 09-14-2011
apogee1mars's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Bakersfield CA.
Posts: 100
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 4
apogee1mars is on a distinguished road
The "Hammer" is figurative speech only. It is what it is when it is time to go to a Maritime court proceeding.
The rules of the road right away laws are hard for me to decipher. The two point abaft of beam stuff, or converging azimuths. Heck, I know this is old but look at the Andrea Doria, Stocholm sinking and what was derived from RADAR. There was a USCG mishap that took place off of Newport Beach CA years ago that ended up with the CG cutter going down after a collision with a private motor yacht. Broad daylight, RADARS radaring. Otto steering the private boat while the skipper was on the foredeck with a little wine, cheese, and Gretchen. Cutter converging from the starboard. Take a guess who got hung?


PS Aaron I bought a PA24-260 out of Reno a couple of years back

Last edited by apogee1mars; 09-14-2011 at 06:44 PM.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message Share with Facebook
  #9  
Old 09-14-2011
apogee1mars's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Bakersfield CA.
Posts: 100
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 4
apogee1mars is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by xymotic View Post
....if anyone EVER put together your post(s) advocating such and tied it to you in court,it would not take too clever of an attorney to have you found at fault for just about any collision, radar related or not
I think I will worry about getting hit with a meteor first...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message Share with Facebook
  #10  
Old 09-14-2011
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 713
Thanks: 3
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Rep Power: 10
xymotic is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by knuterikt View Post
Neither nmea 0183 nor nmea 2000 can be used to send data from the radar antenna to the display.
For older radars the processing of the signals from the antenna are processed in the display unit.

Newer models have moved the processing into the radar unit, these are designed to be used with MFD's (Multi Function Display). They need a high bandwidt conection between the antenna and the MFD.

The new Furuno sets that are beeing used with the Navnet3D series are using ethernet with a proprietary protocol on top.
The MaxSea PC software (owned by Furuno) can also display the radar picture.

Other new designs use similar solutions.
This is true and also a little misleading. The OP is talking about a stand-alone radar with a display. These units ARE capable of tracking a target, and then sending that data to any other brand of MFD or laptop.

It will not show the actual 'sweep' of the radar but when you select a target it will continue tracking it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message Share with Facebook
Reply

Tags
radar nmea-0183

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

By choosing to post the reply above you agree to the rules you agreed to when joining Sailnet.
Click Here to view those rules.

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the SailNet Community forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
Please note: After entering 3 characters a list of Usernames already in use will appear and the list will disappear once a valid Username is entered.
User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

 
Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may post attachments
You may edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Garmin 740 RADAR Question erps Electronics 7 09-10-2010 10:56 PM
Radar Upgrade Question funjohnson Gear & Maintenance 1 08-27-2010 10:24 PM
Question for you radar observers.. nolatom General Discussion (sailing related) 11 01-05-2010 11:37 AM
Newbie Impressions of Radar overlay (Raymarine c80) without electronic compass, etc. Northeaster Electronics 5 07-08-2009 08:43 AM
Radar Question 1970Columbia34 Gear & Maintenance 31 12-27-2006 10:31 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:46 AM.

Add to My Yahoo!         
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1
(c) Marine.com LLC 2000-2012

The SailNet.com store is owned and operated by a company independent of the SailNet.com forum. You are now leaving the SailNet forum. Click OK to continue or Cancel to return to the SailNet forum.