Diesel Exhaust Systems - SailNet Community
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 1 Old 11-07-2001 Thread Starter
Contributing Authors
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 536
Thanks: 0
Thanked 11 Times in 9 Posts
Rep Power: 18
Diesel Exhaust Systems

I am installing a Yanmar 4JH3-TE, 75-hp engine. Would a water-lift muffler increase back pressure in the exhaust system?

Sue & Larry respond:
During the installation of our Yanmar 4JH3-THE, We tried to keep our exhaust system as direct and straightforward as possible to minimize excessive back pressure. However, what's ideal and what's practical aren't always the same. We ran our proposed design for the exhaust system by two separate Yanmar mechanics prior to the installation and got thumbs up from both of them.

Here's how we ran our system: Our exhaust manifold was connected directly to a Vetus LP75 lift muffler via two Trident rubber exhaust elbows (the lift muffler sits directly beside the manifold). From the manifold, the three-inch exhaust hose rises approximately four feet and moves aft about four feet until it reaches a Vetus LT75 gooseneck fitting mounted to the aft bulkhead in our port lazarette locker (the gooseneck is the highest point in our exhaust run, being approximately three inches below our deck height). From the gooseneck, the exhaust run continues for another 12 feet at a slight downhill angle until it meets the transom. At our transom fitting, we included a rubber flapper to discourage water from finding its way up the hose.

All in all, we used 21 feet of exhaust hose, but I feel that only the run from the lift muffler to the gooseneck is of great consequence from a back-pressure standpoint. By the way, I really like the addition of the Vetus gooseneck fitting. We could have saved a little money by just looping the hose up high, then turning it aft, but the LT75 Vetus incorporates an expanded chamber (similar to a catch basin) below the highest point in the fitting. If seawater were to find a way up the exhaust hose from the transom, there would first have to be enough volume of water to fill this expanded chamber area before the water would run down into the lift muffler.

You could eliminate the lift muffler by running an insulated dry exhaust riser, but I'm not convinced that is necessary. Our last boat, Safari, had a Perkins M 80T (turbo), and we ran a Vetus lift muffler for 3,000 hours without incident and without the engine ever missing a beat. On Serengeti, we've got less than 10 hours so far, but I can tell you that the engine runs smoothly, accelerates cleanly, and is very quiet. I guess time will tell about its reliability, but we've got a good feeling. Good luck to you.


Sue & Larry is offline  
Closed Thread

Quick Reply

By choosing to post the reply above you agree to the rules you agreed to when joining Sailnet.
Click Here to view those rules.

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the SailNet Community forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
Please note: After entering 3 characters a list of Usernames already in use will appear and the list will disappear once a valid Username is entered.

User Name:
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:


Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is Off
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome