Interlux Schooner vs. Sikkens Cetol - SailNet Community

   Search Sailnet:

 forums  store  


Quick Menu
Forums           
Articles          
Galleries        
Boat Reviews  
Classifieds     
Search SailNet 
Boat Search (new)

Shop the
SailNet Store
Anchor Locker
Boatbuilding & Repair
Charts
Clothing
Electrical
Electronics
Engine
Hatches and Portlights
Interior And Galley
Maintenance
Marine Electronics
Navigation
Other Items
Plumbing and Pumps
Rigging
Safety
Sailing Hardware
Trailer & Watersports
Clearance Items

Advertise Here






Go Back   SailNet Community > On Board > Gear & Maintenance
 Not a Member? 


Like Tree14Likes
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 10-04-2013
wavedancer38's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Baltimore
Posts: 156
Thanks: 6
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Rep Power: 5
wavedancer38 is on a distinguished road
Interlux Schooner vs. Sikkens Cetol

For years Sikkens Cetol has been the industry standard for brightwork. Recently, I bought a book called "The brightwork companion" and they seem to prefer Interlux Schooner which costs about the same. Schooner needs 5 to 12 coats vs cetol's 3 to 4, and doesn't give you that orange color and hide the grain. Schooner is a clear finish with a tint of gold and resembles a wooden bar top and lasts as long as cetal, occording to Interlux, who now owns both.

Does anyone have experience with Schooner and feel it is worth the transition?
__________________
Wavedancer
Morgan 384
Baltimore, MD
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
  #2  
Old 10-04-2013
JimsCAL's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Glen Cove, NY
Posts: 2,343
Thanks: 0
Thanked 27 Times in 26 Posts
Rep Power: 8
JimsCAL is on a distinguished road
Re: Interlux Schooner vs. Sikkens Cetol

Schooner is varnish. Great look, but requires more work than Cetol. If you don't like the orange color of the original Cetol, try the natural teak color.
jjablonowski and StormBay like this.
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
  #3  
Old 10-04-2013
bljones's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: South Coast Ontario
Posts: 8,125
Thanks: 32
Thanked 69 Times in 62 Posts
Rep Power: 7
bljones has a spectacular aura about bljones has a spectacular aura about
Re: Interlux Schooner vs. Sikkens Cetol

Quote:
Originally Posted by wavedancer38 View Post
For years Sikkens Cetol has been the industry standard for brightwork.
No, it hasn't.
It has been the shortcut preferred by those who can't do, or don't want to do a proper varnish schedule.
The use of Cetol is usually excused with "I'd rather spend my time sailing.'

IMO Cetol is to varnishing brightwork as microwaving a Lean Cuisine is to cooking.
Now that you have read the "brightwork companion" you understand how brightwork SHOULD be done.

I am not a big Schooner fan- As old-school as it sounds, I think Le Tonk is the way to go. More forgiving than Schooner, smoother layout, easier to thin, dries and hardens well and colours nicely.
__________________
It's 5 o'clock somewhere:


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Last edited by bljones; 10-04-2013 at 08:47 PM.
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
  #4  
Old 10-05-2013
steve77's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Salem, MA
Posts: 481
Thanks: 3
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Rep Power: 4
steve77 is on a distinguished road
Re: Interlux Schooner vs. Sikkens Cetol

I am will be doing my brightwork over the winter. I think what's on there now (what's left of it anyway) is Cetol (based on the color). I plan on going with Epifaines. I'll have the time so I might as well do it "right".
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
  #5  
Old 10-05-2013
StormBay's Avatar
Jnoiur Mebemr
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: St. Augustine
Posts: 155
Thanks: 1
Thanked 8 Times in 7 Posts
Rep Power: 4
StormBay is on a distinguished road
Re: Interlux Schooner vs. Sikkens Cetol

I dont know why every one hates on Cetol so much. The older colors were orange, but the natural teak comes out really nice. Its sooo much easer and lasts sooo much longer than varnish.
__________________
Yu & Frank

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
  #6  
Old 10-05-2013
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 240
Thanks: 0
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
Rep Power: 8
SVTatia is on a distinguished road
Re: Interlux Schooner vs. Sikkens Cetol

Quote:
Originally Posted by bljones View Post
No, it hasn't.
It has been the shortcut preferred by those who can't do, or don't want to do a proper varnish schedule.
The use of Cetol is usually excused with "I'd rather spend my time sailing...
Varnish schedule? WTF!
After 6 years in the tropics, Cetol is definitely the right excuse for me - two coats once a year, no sanding, that is all.
Take your varnished yacht down south and I mean South, then you'll understand these are not excuses and shortcuts. We would rather be sailing, or not?
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
  #7  
Old 10-05-2013
bljones's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: South Coast Ontario
Posts: 8,125
Thanks: 32
Thanked 69 Times in 62 Posts
Rep Power: 7
bljones has a spectacular aura about bljones has a spectacular aura about
Re: Interlux Schooner vs. Sikkens Cetol

SVT, two coats a year is all you need to do to maintain varnish brightwork as well, IF you took the time the first time to lay on 6-8 properly thinned coats on a properly sanded surface.

A varnish schedule is not something you put in your appointment book, it simply means the order of finishing the wood- number of coats, how each coat should be thinned, the sanding order (between which coats), etc., comprises the varnish schedule.
__________________
It's 5 o'clock somewhere:


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
  #8  
Old 10-05-2013
KeelHaulin's Avatar
STARBOARD!!
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,662
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Rep Power: 10
KeelHaulin will become famous soon enough KeelHaulin will become famous soon enough
Re: Interlux Schooner vs. Sikkens Cetol

Quote:
Originally Posted by bljones View Post
SVT, two coats a year is all you need to do to maintain varnish brightwork as well, IF you took the time the first time to lay on 6-8 properly thinned coats on a properly sanded surface.
That's the problem with varnish. Two coats a year. That means every spring and fall I'd need to sand, mask and apply it. Way too much time to spend on teak maintenance. Cetol only needs reapplication for maintenance once every 18 months to two years. That's 3-4x better performance than varnish.

Natural teak is the color that looks best; it's not orange, and not opaque. 3-4 thin coats of natural teak beneath 2-3 coats of gloss will not look orange or obscure the grain. I've had Cetol on for 8 years and it has not peeled or lifted.

Last edited by KeelHaulin; 10-05-2013 at 10:59 PM.
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
  #9  
Old 10-05-2013
bljones's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: South Coast Ontario
Posts: 8,125
Thanks: 32
Thanked 69 Times in 62 Posts
Rep Power: 7
bljones has a spectacular aura about bljones has a spectacular aura about
Re: Interlux Schooner vs. Sikkens Cetol

Keel, two coats a year means two coats once a year, not one coat twice a year. So, how is

"3-4 thin coats of natural teak beneath 2-3 coats of gloss " every 18 months any sort of time savings over 2 coats of varnish every 12 months? Doing the math, in three years I have had to lay on 2 coats three times, you have laid on 7 coats twice. I've put in 6 coats, you have done 14.
__________________
It's 5 o'clock somewhere:


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
  #10  
Old 10-06-2013
KeelHaulin's Avatar
STARBOARD!!
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,662
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Rep Power: 10
KeelHaulin will become famous soon enough KeelHaulin will become famous soon enough
Re: Interlux Schooner vs. Sikkens Cetol

Your math is also incorrect. When you put down a base coat of natural teak you apply a minimum of 3 coats IIRC. If you want to clear coat for more durability you put two coats over that so its 5 coats initially, same as varnish. The 18month to two year maintenance coat can be a single coat. I usually put two thinner coats on instead of one, the clear flows better and is more workable with a little bit of thinning. Everything I've read says that varnish needs re coating every six months unless you are at a high latitude. I get two years out of Cetol here in San Francisco, you might get one year out of varnish here but I don't know. I've seen many slightly neglected varnish jobs suddenly start peeling at my marina; not the case with cetol if you heed the warning signs (dull finish, some light surface checking).

I'd say in 8 years I have about 12 coats total including base coat, but only had to re-coat 4 times instead of 8, and prepping is most of the work.
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
Reply

Tags
cetol


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

 
Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may post attachments
You may edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
interlux epoxycop.. groundhog Gear & Maintenance 1 05-29-2009 02:34 AM
Sikkens-Cetol Marine Natural Teak? BigMoe Gear & Maintenance 12 05-05-2009 09:40 AM
sikkens cetol question gwp Gear & Maintenance 4 12-21-2003 04:02 PM
Cetol vs cetol light Lastmango69 Gear & Maintenance 2 07-22-2003 04:12 PM
Sikkens marine varnish obiec Gear & Maintenance 3 05-13-2003 02:55 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:39 AM.

Add to My Yahoo!         
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1
(c) Marine.com LLC 2000-2012