Another electrical question - SailNet Community
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 2 Old 06-29-2005 Thread Starter
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 15
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 0
Another electrical question

This is really basic but bugging me. I am trying to learn about electrical circuits, systems, etc. I am pretty impaired in this and starting from scratch. I bought an old, basic college text on electricity. It describes basic DC circuits in terms of electrons going from the negative to positive poles (in a battery powered system). This makes sense to me since negatively charged electrons would be repelled at the negative pole. However, every text of boating electrical systems I read describes current flow in a DC system going from positive pole through the load to negative pole. I guess it does not really matter in terms of the load since it would work no matter which direction the flow is going but this is bothering me. Can someone tell me why 2 authors would describe this phenomenon differently?
wallm is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
Sponsored Links
post #2 of 2 Old 06-29-2005
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 552
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 15
Another electrical question

You’re correct - there are two (or more) theories, and the direction of flow doesn’t matter:

“Electron Flow Theory” states that current flows from negative to positive.
“Conventional Flow Theory” states that current flows from positive to negative.

The direction of Electron flow is from Negative potential to Positive potential. As electrons vacate their atoms, during electron flow, positively charged atoms (with Holes) result. The flow of electrons in one direction causes a flow of positive charges (holes) in the opposite direction. This flow of positive charges is known as “Conventional Current Flow”

All of the effects of Electron Flow (from Negative to Positive) are exactly the same as those that would be created by a Conventional Current flow in the opposite direction. The two conventions are essentially equivalent, and may be consistently used interchangeably - as all predicted effects will be the same.

And then there’s “Hole Theory” -vs- “Smoke Theory” debate:

GordMay is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook

Quick Reply

By choosing to post the reply above you agree to the rules you agreed to when joining Sailnet.
Click Here to view those rules.

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the SailNet Community forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
Please note: After entering 3 characters a list of Usernames already in use will appear and the list will disappear once a valid Username is entered.

User Name:
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:


Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Depth finder question?? gwp Gear & Maintenance 10 01-12-2009 06:32 PM
Another proper course question langousta Racing 11 12-27-2005 05:33 AM
Mast Question Vastbinder General Discussion (sailing related) 8 03-15-2005 07:42 AM
Strange Electrical Fire knewell General Discussion (sailing related) 3 12-15-2003 11:38 AM
Sail trim question JimOppy Racing 4 05-16-2003 07:30 AM

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome