
11-28-2006
|
 |
Just another Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: New Westminster, BC
Posts: 9,271
Rep Power: 9
|
|
|
Columbia - we used the same HVLP turbine system to spray. (Fuji). It worked well with minimal overspray, but the result was not totally professional looking - gloss was not the same as a pro job nearby. The biggest advantage is the warm air used to paint, and the absolute lack of oil in the air.
For the nonskid on the deck we bought a large bore nozzle for it, mixed the Griptex (course/medium grit 50/50) into the paint, and added a couple of ball bearings into the spray pot to help keep it agitated. That worked very well. We painted the non-nonskid areas first, then masked off the non skid and sprayed that. You really only get one shot at the deck since you can hardly walk on it for the second pass. Also the spray pot has a vent - you have to fashion a collar to catch the drippings because of the angle of the gun when spraying the deck.
We also sprayed the rig. This turned out really nice - it was the last thing we did, so we were getting the hang of it, and also we were advised to go as thin as possible because of the flexibility of the mast, in the end the finish was excellent.
The nonskid areas ended up looking great - uniform coverage and attractive, but not the most effective in all conditions. It seemed to improve with time as the initially fresh painted nonskid was quite slick when wet.
In the end we redid the entire boat, topsides, deck, plus the annual bottom paint for around $5-6K Cdn (1996) for materials... compared to $20K or more for a pro job.
I'd keep the nonskid colour lighter rather than dark - very hot underfoot otherwise.
|