I started off thinking all solar, because the wind doesn't blow well where I like to
anchor and the blades make a lot of noise. The DuoGen looks neat, but expensive, and I have a lot of clutter on the rear deck anyway.
What has slowed me down is the top-weight and the drag. My
rig and wheelhouse are already pretty robust. She's not particularly tender, but 25 knots and 20 degrees heel are my reefing guides close hauled (also to reduce weatherhelm). When I looked at how much 240 Wp of panels, plus supporting structure, weighs, plus height above water
line.... hmmm. Then my past involvement in aerodramatics taught me that drag loves sharp corners and standard panels have lots of those. So there will be more drag from them than looks likely from their size. Not that 240 Wp of panels are particularly small.
My More Intelligent Partner suggested that maybe taking them down before sailing might solve my draggy top-weight concerns. - Which would be OK if I had a towed generator and suitable places to store them.
Then I find that the more efficient monocrystal panels loose power very quickly with any shadow at all. Nearer the equator that may not be such a problem but here in the 40's there is nearly always a shadow cast by part of the
rig. I would need 480 Wp to compensate.
MMIP also suggested if the panels were moveable, then they could be always deployed somewhere sunny side up.
On the basis that experience is better than theory. I went for a 32Wp flexible panel. This has the disadvantage of being the less efficient, but is a shadow tolerant thin-film type that can withstand a bit of moving about. At the moment it is bungied to the boom facing south and has kept my battery bank happy all winter. I would need another 7 to reach my desired 240 Wp for operational use but I could add them one at a time. The cost differential is a bit frightening though. Maybe the DuoGen is competitively priced....