broken boom mid-boom sheeting problem? - Page 2 - SailNet Community
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #11 of 16 Old 10-18-2007
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 20
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 0
Most, if not all, in mast furling systems use a loose footed mains. However, you will find that the Main Sheet traveler is located somewhere between approx 3/4 to full aft on the boom.

The beam reach gybe is never good for any boom if not sheeted in and then released. Could be a combination issue.
GeminiDaze is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
Sponsored Links
post #12 of 16 Old 10-19-2007
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,708
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 10
Originally Posted by Tartan34C View Post
... or adding material to the bottom surface. Inserts are made for some sections just for this reason.
I should probably look into this. The PO moved the sheeting from end-boom to 2/3 boom (approx.) and the high-performance main is loose-footed, whereas the original sail was not.

SEMIJim is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #13 of 16 Old 10-23-2007
KeelHaulin's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,662
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Rep Power: 11
Originally Posted by Faster View Post
I'd like to know if anyone ever actually analyzed the boom loading of loose footed vs bolt rope mains.... The major loads will be on the clew and tack in any case, I suspect. Esp with the outhaul eased I wouldn't expect the bolt rope to really spread and absorb a lot of load. But who knows......
I have not done any sort of "analysis" on this; but one thing that tells me that the loads are higher on a loose foot is that when you adjust an outhaul on the main with a bolt rope it is easier to tighten than when reefing the same sail. I know that a reefing line goes through the eye which increases friction (and the force on an outhaul is reduced because the outhaul car is helping); but you really can't reef a sail without easing the sheet until the sail is luffing and even then it is not nearly as easy to tighten than when the sail has a bolt rope and outhaul. With most of the lift force generated 2/3 of the way forward on the sail I would suspect there to be significant vertical pull on the bolt rope across the length of the foot. When there is no "foot" the outhaul would have to take all of this load in addition to the outward pull it normally sees.

It's possible that the stock boom on the Beneteau 390 was not designed for a loose foot main. Many of the 'newer' boats were FEA designed and considerations for how the loads were placed on the boom may have been made specifically for a bolt-rope main; that was the "stock" sail in the early 90's (loose footed mainsails are relatively new in design). If you look at the new Catalinas they are using a "roll-bar" so that the mainsheet is end-boom controlled, with mast-furling mainsail that is loose-footed. It's possible that this is done to reduce the bending load on the boom; that roll-bar looks like a pricey item for MFR costs. I could be wrong it might only be there to help sell user-friendly boats...

In a normal low windspeed tack I would not expect to see a failure like this; it's hard to say if the loose foot caused it or if it was just a contributing factor. If it was an uncontrolled gybe then certainly the shock loading could have caused the failure (loose-footed or not).
KeelHaulin is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #14 of 16 Old 10-23-2007
Just another Moderator
Faster's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: New Westminster, BC
Posts: 16,976
Thanks: 113
Thanked 355 Times in 335 Posts
Rep Power: 10
A couple of further thought on this....

When a bolt rope main is tightly outhauled, most of the material (the "shelf") in the foot area is slack and folded under the taut part of the foot between tack and clew.. as such I don't believe there's a great deal of support for the boom there. I think you could treat that situation as essentially "loose footed".

A reefed main is close to the same thing... all the loads are between tack and clew, the reef cringles really are not supporting sail loading even if they are tied in (nor are they meant to). Whether the forces on a reefed main are reduced would depend on just how windy it is, of course, and how appropriately reefed the sail is.

btw the OP has yet to clarify (unless I missed it) whether they were tacking or gybing when this happened.. I suspect they were gybing reach to reach .. so obviously that would increase the potential shock loads involved, as you say, Keelhaulin, loosefooted or not.

I suspect that mishandling, mishap or structural issues would have more to do with this failure than the sail type. I do think mid boom sheeting in general is going to be more prone to this problem.
Faster is online now  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #15 of 16 Old 10-23-2007
Telstar 28
sailingdog's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: New England
Posts: 43,290
Thanks: 0
Thanked 16 Times in 13 Posts
Rep Power: 14
Hmm...Yes, I believe that there is a significantly higher percentage of booms breaking due to mid-boom sheeting. However, there are many other factors that could have affected the boom and caused it to break as well.

Galvanic corrosion is a strong possibility, especially if the bail and bolts are stainless steel and no galvanic isolation washers or compound was used during their installation.

The change from a bolt-rope main to a loose-footed main could have certainly contriibuted. A bolt rope main spreads a lot of the load across the boom more evenly, rather than just point loading the clew and tack.

Fatigue of the boom is also another possible contributor. Aluminum doesn't have to actually bend to fatigue, and flexing around the point where the mid-boom sheeting attaches seems more than likely.

Finally, if you were gybing, instead of tacking, the loads could be high enough to snap a boom, even if it weren't previously compromised. Tacking, I think it is far less likely to have been the cause, since the boom will generally move across the boat with significantly less force, since the wind is essentially pushing the boom into luffing, rather than loading it and then switching the loading forces almost instantly.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Telstar 28
New England

You know what the first rule of sailing is? ...Love. You can learn all the math in the 'verse, but you take
a boat to the sea you don't love, she'll shake you off just as sure as the turning of the worlds. Love keeps
her going when she oughta fall down, tells you she's hurting 'fore she keens. Makes her a home.

—Cpt. Mal Reynolds, Serenity (edited)

If you're new to the Sailnet Forums... please read this
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

sailingdog is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #16 of 16 Old 10-23-2007
KeelHaulin's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,662
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Rep Power: 11
Yep; there may be multiple factors at work. If there was no visible corrosion I'd say possibly a combination of metal fatigue and the change in loading due to the loose foot. Still hard to say why it happened without seeing some detailed pictures and another post from Pam about the incident.

We "chicken gybe" my boat regularly in 25 to 30 kt winds and I would not say that the loading on the boom when doing this is signifigantly higher than if we were sailing upwind and tacking. When you turn to windward the sails develop a bit more power until they go luff but for the most part it is less stressful on the rig than attempting to do a direct jybe and having the boom crash if not sheeted or released quickly enough.
KeelHaulin is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook

Quick Reply

By choosing to post the reply above you agree to the rules you agreed to when joining Sailnet.
Click Here to view those rules.

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the SailNet Community forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
Please note: After entering 3 characters a list of Usernames already in use will appear and the list will disappear once a valid Username is entered.

User Name:
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:


Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome