[Engines] Determining proper HP for a given boat design. - SailNet Community
Senior Member

Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Toronto
Posts: 5,491
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Rep Power: 13

[Engines] Determining proper HP for a given boat design.

A good friend of mine has a steel 36,000 lb. Goderich 40, a Bill Wallstrom design from the late '70s. Four of them were built. His original and underpowered for the job Volvo 35 HP is coming out and he is proposing putting in a Yanmar 75 HP turbo.

What he has asked me to find out is if anyone knows of some sort of Web resource that can properly match an "ideal" engine to a specific type of boat, given the usual designer's parameters, keel type, displacement, etc. He is thinking of going with the 75 to turn alternators, PTO for compressor, etc. and simply to have "extra" to push his three blade Autoprop that his old Volvo didn't have (although it could push him well enough at hull speed in flat water).

Does anyone know of websites with data along these lines? He could probably live with a 60 HP, but the price difference between a Yanmar 50 and a 75 is only a couple of grand.
Valiente is offline

Old 10-31-2007
.

Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 10,851
Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 2 Posts
Rep Power: 15

Val, if he calls Yanmar with the boat's detail, they'll calculate it for free for him.

If they don't let me know I ask Pinto, my yanmar/crew/friend dealer and he will calculate it for you
Giulietta is offline
Old 10-31-2007
Member

Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Beacon, New York
Posts: 652
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Rep Power: 11

It’s not the kind of thing that is solved with a simple individual formula so a webpage approach is unlikely and I don’t know of any website that tries it. Is he mathematically inclined? If he is I can recommend some books that deal with this or point him to a collection of formulas.
All the best,
Robert Gainer

Study the history of naval architecture and move forward knowing what didn’t work before.

Don’t waste time making the same old mistakes but instead make new ones and to insure your place in history be sure the mistakes are big ones.

Never design a mast that is weaker then the boat
Never design a boat that is weaker then the mast

Never listen to someone describe why your project will not work unless they can show you the broken pieces of their own version.
Tartan34C is offline

Old 10-31-2007
Moderator

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Chesapeake
Posts: 5,680
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Rep Power: 10

Valiente,

Your friend might poke around here a bit:

http://boatdiesel.com/index.cfm?cfapp=31

I'm not certain, but one of the formulas he may be looking for might be called the "propeller exponent."

Nigel Calder did a nice article in this month's (OCT) Ocean Navigator -- entitled "Improving Low Speed Efficiency " -- which dealt in part with engine size selection. From the stand point of fuel consumption and efficiency, I was surprised at the magnitude of the penalty for going with TOO LARGE of an engine. So that "couple grand" price spread between the 60 and 75 would continue to grow over the life of the engine. Plus, without additional tankage, the range of the boat under power would go down.

So many variables...
JohnRPollard is offline
Senior Member

Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Toronto
Posts: 5,491
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Rep Power: 13

Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnRPollard View Post
Valiente,

Your friend might poke around here a bit:

http://boatdiesel.com/index.cfm?cfapp=31

I'm not certain, but one of the formulas he may be looking for might be called the "propeller exponent."

Nigel Calder did a nice article in this month's (OCT) Ocean Navigator -- entitled "Improving Low Speed Efficiency " -- which dealt in part with engine size selection. From the stand point of fuel consumption and efficiency, I was surprised at the magnitude of the penalty for going with TOO LARGE of an engine. So that "couple grand" price spread between the 60 and 75 would continue to grow over the life of the engine. Plus, without additional tankage, the range of the boat under power would go down.

So many variables...
I'll check that out, thanks...I am expecting my copy of ON very soon.

That's exactly the sort of thing we were discussing, because his Autoprop was (even with a DriveSaver) very hard on the old Volvo, wearing out cones in the transmission and such, but the opposite is true, of course, that he might "lug" with too large an engine that he never gets into the proper power band.

This is why I decided to stick with my 52 HP, despite my 30,000 weight: with a four-blade VariProp, I will have a great deal of torque at low speeds, but I should be able to push the engine a little harder if I need speed. Right now with a fixed 18 x 13 three-blade, I can get to 6.4 knots at 2,100 rpm. With a four-blade 19 x 15 (the new prop), I suspect I'll run 200 rpm faster, which will be more efficient.
Valiente is offline
Old 11-01-2007
Senior Member

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Scotland
Posts: 2,365
Thanks: 0
Thanked 11 Times in 11 Posts
Rep Power: 11

I am wary of turbos. Do we need them. Is the weight penalty of a normally aspirated engine really that bad?
Rockter is offline
Old 11-01-2007
Senior Member

Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Malaysia
Posts: 314
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 14

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rockter View Post
I am wary of turbos. Do we need them. Is the weight penalty of a normally aspirated engine really that bad?
I totally agree.
This seems to be an application where torque is more a question than speed and horsepower (Torque x rpm) and wheight not the biggest problem. Then it might get down to engine room size, what is room to put in, but I would have chosen and 'old' normally aspirated (non turbo) engine.
haffiman37 is offline
Senior Member

Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Toronto
Posts: 5,491
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Rep Power: 13

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rockter View Post
I am wary of turbos. Do we need them. Is the weight penalty of a normally aspirated engine really that bad?
Yeah, I've been making the same comments to him. Added mechanical complexity to what end? He already has excellent engine room ventilation, and it's a steel full-keeler...I've been hinting that maybe the Cummins 66 HP is a better choice, but he's saying that Yanmar is so widespread he'll never have to search for parts.

I think turbo is great for race boats where every gram counts, but both he and I are far less affected by 100 kilos in the engine bay than most, 100 kilos being 0.3% of our total displacement.
Valiente is offline
Old 11-01-2007
Telstar 28

Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: New England
Posts: 43,290
Thanks: 0
Thanked 18 Times in 14 Posts
Rep Power: 16

Turbos aren't really an ideal solution for a marine application IMHO. To really benefit from a turbo, you need to open the throttle up more... and that is pretty hard on a marine use diesel. A better approach is generally to get a properly sized normally aspirated engine. It will be a bit heavier and larger, but it will also last longer IMHO.

Sailingdog

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Telstar 28
New England

You know what the first rule of sailing is? ...Love. You can learn all the math in the 'verse, but you take
a boat to the sea you don't love, she'll shake you off just as sure as the turning of the worlds. Love keeps
her going when she oughta fall down, tells you she's hurting 'fore she keens. Makes her a home.

—Cpt. Mal Reynolds, Serenity (edited)

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
.

sailingdog is offline
Old 11-01-2007
Cruising

Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: crusing
Posts: 157
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Rep Power: 12

INHO..The turbo is an excelant choice for a sailboat.. been working woth turbos for a number of years, and installed one on every vehicle I owned .. its a sorce for un-used eneregy.
A turbo is, as we all know, are advetised as a performance add-on for most cars, but turbos have been used for truck applications all the way back to the 30s & 40s.. Its a sorce for tapping into power at LOW RPM as well as High..
On a boat, the ability to run a couple extra degrees of pitch while still operating at the same RPM or even lower and still keeping the same speed would be a positive swap..
On a desplacement boat...Catch the word "displacement" your pushing water, and that takes power.. and if you can create more power with less motor, thats a savings...
And what I've heard, the new Yanmar with a turbo, it only weeps fuel.
and the cost of fuel is getting higher every day,
I would change mine out in a minute, if this old war-horse would ever give out... I've got a perkins 4108 and the new yanmar is a perfect swap but with this Perkins, It will probably be here long after I'm gone..
RandyonR3 is offline

Message:
Options

By choosing to post the reply above you agree to the rules you agreed to when joining Sailnet.

## Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the SailNet Community forums, you must first register.
Please note: After entering 3 characters a list of Usernames already in use will appear and the list will disappear once a valid Username is entered.

User Name:
OR

## Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.

 Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)